this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2026
205 points (69.2% liked)

/0 Governance

355 readers
1 users here now

A community for discussion and democratic decision making in the Divisions by zero.

Anyone with voting rights can open a governance thread and initiate a vote or a discussion. There's no special keywords you must be aware of before you open a thread, but there are some. here's the governance thread manual.

Answers

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Ahoy mateys!

A few of our users have recently pointed out that a lot of the pro-Zionist accounts on the fediverse nowadays seem to come from the feddit.org instance.

Feddit.org's explanation for this situation seems to fit into a few common variations:

  • They accept both pro- and anti-Zionist members, so it's not proof of a bias.
  • They [choose to] comply [in advance] with strict German / Swiss / Austrian laws regarding [overly broad] "antisemitic" language, or they might get in trouble.
  • Calling for the destruction of Israel must obviously mean you want to kill every last man, woman and child, rather than simply wanting to overthrow Netanyahu's genocidal fascist regime. Because [bad faith] reasons.
  • Lots of Euros (and Germans specifically) are pro-Zionist, so they feel like they have to accommodate this view.

But whatever the excuse happens to be, they need to do better imo. Israel is currently the most violent, fascist and genocidal nation state in the Middle East (if you exclude the US military bases there). And yet feddit.org seems to regard the Palestinians fighting against Israel's ongoing illegal occupation of their land as the real terrorists. As such, I am calling for feddit.org to:

  • Explicitly prohibit pro-Zionist accounts from joining.
  • Take measures to resolve their claimed legal issues, e.g., moving their server location to a less regulated jurisdiction, and ensuring that admin accounts remain anonymous regarding their location.
  • Stop referring to folks who call for "Death to Israel" or similar as though they are the terrorists or violent extremists. The Zionist Israeli settlers, the murderous IDF rapists, and the entirety of the Israeli government are clearly the violent ethnostate extremists we should be worried about, not the Palestinians in Gaza who are fighting for their lives every single day against completely disproportionate levels of Zionist violence.

More context

Our instance already voted to ban pro-Zionist accounts (see https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/60585441 for reference) and the rule that was implemented is here: Golden Rule #8.

As further context, you can find relevant comments and discussion in this post by a banned feddit admin in MoG (that fact they chose to post in MoG is in itself quite telling), and this post about their defederation from quokk.au over anti-semitism allegations has recently become active again.

I've also pulled out some choice morsels from the modlog to illustrate the sort of thing we are talking about:

This one says it all... mrdown@lemmy.world being banned for calling out feddit.org users for being Zionist apologists. It's apparently "xenophobic" to state a few hard truths.

If you have had similar experiences on feddit.org, please feel free to share in the comments.

Voting instructions

I am proposing to ban the following communities from feddit.org, which seem to be the most problematic communities in terms of hosting pro-Zionist posts/comments:

Upvote this post if you want dbzer0 / anarchist nexus to ban these communities.

Downvote this post if you'd prefer not to ban these communities.

Note 1: Votes from external instances do not count, unless one of our admins has vouched for you.

Note 2: If you think feddit.org deserves a full instance ban instead, or have alternative suggestions, then please leave your comments below. If enough people think that's the better option, then we'll do that instead.

Note 3: Although I don't really expect this to happen, if feddit.org agrees to make policy changes to address these issues then we are willing to reassess the situation.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] div0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Acknowledged governance topic opened by https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/u/flatworm7591 Early Bird: a parrot, orangered colors Jolly Roger: an icon of pirate jolly roger skull wearing a hat, in orange-red, black and white colors A book with a loaf of bread in the cover  in orange-red, black and white colors Deck Hand: An icon of anchor crossed with two staves in orange-red, black and white colors First Mate: a pirate ship's steering wheel, orangered color

This is a simple majority vote. The current tally is as follows:

  • For: First Mate: a pirate ship's steering wheel, orangered color (5), MVP: a star icon, in orange-red, black and white colors (1), Powder Monkey: An icon of powder barrel in orange-red, black and white colors (1), Vouched: a minimalist compass icon. Orangered color (7), Deck Hand: An icon of anchor crossed with two staves in orange-red, black and white colors (1)
  • Against: Deck Hand: An icon of anchor crossed with two staves in orange-red, black and white colors Vouched: a minimalist compass icon. Orangered color Deck Hand: An icon of anchor crossed with two staves in orange-red, black and white colors First Mate: a pirate ship's steering wheel, orangered color Threadiverse Enjoyer: An icon of a doubloon with a black hole in the center in orange-red, black and white colors
  • Local Community: +0.4
  • Outsider sentiment: Supportive
  • Total: +10.4
  • Percentage: 75.00%

This vote will complete in 1 days

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] heckypecky@lemmy.dbzer0.com 68 points 2 weeks ago (21 children)

"you should be lined up against a wall and shot"

"Kill yourself"

It blows my mind how this type of speech is being used by the op as proof that they're on the right side of things. This is so wack that some part of me wants to believe this is some kind of social experiment to find out how far you can push people on social media until they push back against the echo chamber.

But I doubt it is. It seems more likely that this mod is leveraging his position to instrumentalize this community and shape it after his own vision of political activism. All under a laughable guise of democracy. Every single vote on this instance has been presented in a biased and manipulative way that leaves no doubt what the outcome "should" be. How very democratic of you. Slow clap.

Hey, unruffled: your attempts at social engineering and radicalization are ham-fisted and painful to watch.

I initially joined db0 because it seemed like one of the more heterogenous communities on Lemmy. That there was no clear label that comes with the db0 tag like "the tankie" (hexbear) or "the normie" (world). That it had the shortest list of defederations in comparison with the other bigger instances.

Over the past few months this has changed. There has been a shift towards echo chamber, armchair revolution and increasingly more hateful language. Give it three more votes and you'll be voting in favor of roasting babies on a stick. Because free Palestine, or Zionism, or something. SMH.

I don't like being told what to think about a certain topic. Even when that view aligns with my own. And before the mob frothing at the mouth charges at me - yes I'm German and yes, free Palestine and down with Israel (preferably with not a single additional life lost).

For all instance members reading this:

"Don't worry you'll get the wall"

Do you want to be associated with people who unironically spout this type of hatred? I don't. Bye, db0

[–] borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com 44 points 2 weeks ago (11 children)

Yeah you nailed it. There’s been quite a few votes with quite a few vocal people that are just not it. I left sh.itjust.works to come here because the vibe shifted on a similar trajectory. I’ve been donating to this instance monthly since I joined, but I’m close to pulling the fucking plug on it.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] ordnance_qf_17_pounder@reddthat.com 29 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

To hell with civility politics. The outrage is the mass slaughter of innocent people, not some unpleasant language on the internet. It's not surprising that people hate evil bastards.

[–] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I agree, this is the number one reason I have grown to really hate liberals and liberal apologists. When the issue is human lives you don't get to argue about someone being less than polite. Human lives are more important than the feelings of whiny liberals. Especially whiny Zionist liberals (who are often the ones invoking respectability politics to silence anti-Zionists and antifascists).

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Zedstrian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Calling for the destruction of Israel must obviously mean you want to kill every last man, woman and child, rather than simply wanting to overthrow Netanyahu's genocidal fascist regime.

They complain of users being misinterpreted, but when those users use deliberately inflammatory language elsewhere, it's not a stretch for a moderator to then interpret messages like 'death to Israel' as calling for further violence—implicitly against civilians—and taking action based on it. Supporting the genocide against Palestine is wrong, but so is calling for retributory violence against Israeli civilians, explicitly or implicitly. Their moderation problematically confuses anti-Zionism and antisemitism at times, but it's not an action they should be blocked or defederated over.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)
[–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 46 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (11 children)

I've got a few thoughts on this.

First, its insane to me that someone could read the rules and decide anti-zionist is anti-semitic. That is either someone who doesn't understand words and has no interest in learning them, or is someone actively zionist (and supports genocide, thus the issue with zionism).

Second, I've got my complaints about what I'm seeing from the flotilla/friendly instances.

  • Someone saying "Fuck off you piece of trash" getting banned from a community is in no way a surprise.
  • The same goes for "You'll get the wall"
  • Same for "kys"
  • Same for calling someone a Nazi for what I assume is a supportive comment about the war in Ukraine. Just to note, don't bother trying to respond to me with anything about Russia being in the right on this one. I'll just block.

Third, there are quite a few comments there that are completely appropriate (support for Israel is support for genocide, etc), the thread about quokk.au is utterly nonsensical to me, as are the discussions in MoG (which shouldn't really be a surprise).

To sum up my thoughts.... At no point do I regret voting in support of rule 8. I am really disappointed by some of the comments I'm seeing being used as support for de-federating though, some of those are just disgusting.

Overall, I'm in support of dropping the comms due to the blatant zionist posts that go on there.

Edit: formatting fuckup, and a whole word.

[–] BootyEnthusiast@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 2 weeks ago

Agreed. Your take is the most reasonable and one I can get behind. Full defederating is insane.

Some of those modlog screenshots are 100% warranted. Dude is coming in angry and just slinging out hatred.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 45 points 2 weeks ago (39 children)

Just yesterday I had an odd interaction with an .ml user who reposted a straight-up nazi tweet, by a nazi profile, even with their own thread title resembling a frequent nazi dogwhistle. Several non-.ml users, apparently mostly from feddit, pointed out the post looks like it was posted by a nazi. .ml users responded in part by attacking their instance allegiance (calling them "whingy fedditers"). Since I posted enough clear evidence of the Twitter profile being a fascist, OP commendably deleted their thread.

What I saw there is feddit users being met with a hate boner from .ml and their correct suspicions of a tweet that looks antisemitic indeed being antisemitic being ignored and made light of.

That's my personal experience with feddit and its zionism, and consequently I've ended up suspicious of some of Lemmy users' standards regarding this whole matter.

The examples of feddit moderation posted here in OP are almost entirely sanctions against grave personal attacks. I am completely unconvinced that this is proof of the moderators' zionist positions. "Fuck you, you piece of trash" and "fuck you and your whole family" is not "a few hard truths". I'm also unsure if I get the context right, is mrdown a Palestinian? Many of those comments break the most elementary civility standards and verge into murderous fantasies.

Calling for the destruction of Israel must obviously mean you want to kill every last man, woman and child, rather than simply wanting to overthrow Netanyahu’s genocidal fascist regime.

Then say it like that? No, destroying a country is not the same as overthrowing its regime, those are different things. I support the latter with regards to Israel, but would hardly dare say the former.

This post was supposed to convince me feddit's behaviour is problematic. I come away with the opposite impression. So, I vote against the bans.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (7 children)

Passing Zionism and Israel as representing the Jewish People is the most anti-semitic thing there is because the actions of that ideology and that nation are some of the most depraved imaginable: portraying Zionism and Isreal as representing the Jewish People is the logical equivalent of claiming that the commiting of Genocide (including explicitly targetting children) and even participating in the running of a pedophile ring (the Epstein one, which Mossad supported) are "Jewish things".

Meanwhile there are the more traditional kinds of anti-semitism which do not taint all Jewish people by conflating them as a group with depraved ideologies and nations and instead just directly slander Jewish People for being Jewish.

And this bring us to your post: you're saying that we should overlook the actions of the first kind of anti-semite, by claiming that in us doing otherwise would weaken efforts against the second kind of anti-semite.

Your claim is the very opposite of logic: it is the first kind of anti-semite who are strengthening the messaging of the second kind (for example, under the [IMHO false] axiom that Israel is the same as The Jewish People, then the Mossad's involvement in the Epstein child-sex ring leads to the mathematically logical conclusion that Jews are pedophiles or at least supporters of pedophilia) because the second kind can leverage the depraved Israeli and Zionist actions and the link to the Jewish People claimed by the first kind to slander all Jews.

Because of this connection between these two kinds of anti-semites, in reality those fighting the former kind of anti-semite weaken the second whilst those protecting the former strengthen the latter.

And this bring us to feddit.org being filled to the brim with the first kind of anti-semite and activelly protecting them from criticism.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (38 replies)
[–] NewDayRocks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 44 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (22 children)

I agree the mods are using antisemitism as a bit of a blanket power for abuse, but this whole post just sounds like personal beef.

Their rules look reasonable and most of their mod logs look acceptable. Some of the removed comments are over the top hate.

I never see these posts in my feed but I would disagree with this ban.

[–] Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Most of the mod logs shared in this post are about the social contract of tolerance, that Nazis/Zionists have broken that contract, and that they don't deserve empathy for their views and instead deserve punishment. Many Nazis/Zionists advocate for the deaths of Palestinians, Jews, third worlders, and the like. Those people should expect to receive what they dish out. We have to be OK with bullying the bullies, and recognize the real victims.

That being said, direct calls for suicide individually rather than general statements about capital punishment for a group of people based on their specific political views is bad form. That mod log was deserved.

These mod logs though, imo, all paint the picture that these Feddit.org mods play victim while shouting for genocide, ethnic cleansing, and apartheid. Doesn't really sound like personal beef. Sounds like the right action to take to prevent these communities from growing.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)
[–] Zedstrian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

With how big some of those communities are, blocking them is paramount to defederating from the instance itself in terms of losing access to posts unrelated to Israel or Zionism (a quarter of Lemmy monthly active users are subscribed to !europe@feddit.org).

Zionism should be spoken out against, but the repercussions of further Threadiverse fragmentation should also be considered. Just as troubling are extremist posts on lemmy.ml, Lemmygrad, and Hexbear, but if their federation is maintained with the benefit of Threadiverse unity gained (with the user retaining the option of implementing their own blocks), then avoiding what amounts to partial defederation with another major instance should also be avoided.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] ggtdbz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

My opinion is more or less that we shouldn’t cut ourselves off from big communities if their theme is not centered on endorsing crimes and if they’re not a community solely for whitewashing them / spreading disinfo.

I think a lot of German speaking users are people who have been exposed to only a narrow view of the world and that they can be valuable allies in the long run. Our instance has been relatively successful at bridging many gaps, I think it would be a shame to defederate entirely.

I’ve seen some questionable takes in places like YUROP but it’s no worse than a large enough .world thread or shjw thread.

My thoughts are unchanged since January. Strikes system for external users promoting imperialism (and the lebensrauming of me, I’m in Lebanon!) on our instance, a special text in German because of how prevalent this issue is among German people. And banning Zionists from signing up to the instance. I’m sure a fellow Arabic speaker could imagine a similar situation for antisemitism. It’s the socialism of fools after all. Surely concern trolling about women’s rights in Gaza is a sort of (subtly imperialist) feminism of fools?

I want the tent to be as big as possible. I want those who excuse these crimes to be exposed to as much common sense as possible. I don’t want them to feel like they have the mainstream opinion anymore.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] deedan06_@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 2 weeks ago (18 children)

I get why you are doing this, and while I can generally relate, this would shut off a huge portion of the fediverse from me. I am austrian and all german speaking and european communities are there. the loss would be significant. Lemmy already has a problem of a limited selection of topics and this would take one away,

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] no_pasaran@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 2 weeks ago (14 children)

Do Feddit users come here and harass communities to an intolerable degree with Zionism? If not, I am completely against defederation. It is fundamentally wrong and should only be considered as a last resort. And that is not the case here. Most Feddit users are just average people who probably don't even know what Zionism means. The same applies to blocking “only” the communities. If you don't like them, block or ignore them yourself. But don't dictate that to me.

I want the Fediverse to be as open as possible. But guys like you want to turn it into a walled garden. Isolated, small, and insignificant. Unfortunately, this seems to be an incurable tendency among left-wingers.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] AssortedBiscuits@hexbear.net 26 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They [choose to] comply [in advance] with strict German / Swiss / Austrian laws regarding [overly broad] "antisemitic" language, or they might get in trouble.

Just following orders like good obedient German citizens

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ordnance_qf_17_pounder@reddthat.com 25 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

They say they are just complying with German, Austrian, and Swiss laws. If criticising Israel is illegal under said laws, I'd rather just shut down feddit.org entirely than comply. If it were me.

[–] Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 2 weeks ago

Well exactly.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

I agree that these communities should be blocked, however I am much more in favor of defederating Feddit as a whole and not just banning these communities. This is because it is Feddit as a platform who enables this behavior, and who ultimately is suppressing anti-Zionist and antifascist voices, while making bad faith arguments to defend Zionism. Including threatening and ultimately defederating other instances for calling them out on it as well as their admins coming here to apologize for Zionism.

The problems with Feddit run much deeper than a few communities being run by Zionist apologists. They run as deep as the management of the site itself. So blocking these communities isn't enough. I believe more will spring up in the future, not necessarily to replace them but because their userbase is predominantly Zionists or Zionist apologists.

They are bad news, we don't need them, and they clearly don't want us. Their admin agreeing with a known Zionist troll and implying we wish to cause harm to Israeli citizens just further proves this:

Feddit is bad news, more than just a few communities there, if they don't do serious work to change we shouldn't be connected with them. If anyone here really wants to be a part of Feddit that badly, you can make an account there or a server that federates with it, likewise with any feddit user who wishes to be on dbzer0.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] ZeroGravitas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Sure, ban those communities. But, out of curiosity, what does an instance wide community ban achieves that my own block list cannot? I already have a sizeable feddit.org presence on said list, so I doubt I would personally see any difference.

Not a big fan of instance banning though, unless there's serious evidence of wrongdoing on our instance from their users. I'm not a wallflower that needs protecting from opinions, I can make my own mind and choose what to read and what to engage with. See: personal blocklist.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

I think this will raise the chances of an echo chamber happening here, and I have not seen the Zionism that you are claiming it is be as widespread as you are claiming to be. I oppose until you can convince me otherwise.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Shore up the yardarms, me hearties. We need to rid ourselves of a few fascists.

If feddit.org is harboring these ass-bags, then they're part of the problem. The issue I see with only banning the communities from showing here is that the users within those communities don't likely know they've been censured.

Playing devil's advocate for my own stance, I should say that the "right" thing to do would be to give them enough rope to hang themselves from the yardarm themselves. In other words, if they're feddit.org user and start spouting Zionist shit on db0, then they're probably someone that should be outright disallowed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Deralax@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 2 weeks ago (12 children)

At the risk of being banned this instance is starting to get annoying with the amount of political keyboard warrioring posts. I thought this was supposed to be a pro piracy anarchist community.

For self proclaimed anarchists there sure is a lot of desire to censor and dictate what opinions everyone is allowed to see.

For fucks sake if you are that bothered by a handful of users just block those individuals. Not all of us have a panic attack when we see an idiot spouting nonsense we don't agree with.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] rivvvver@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

id rather get into arguments with zionists than stick my head in the sand and hope they change on their own.

[–] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I respect that sentiment but the problem is that these communities actively suppress dissent while not suppressing Zionists. So the end result is that it means Zionists can argue with you, and they'll ban you if you argue back so you can't argue with them. Ultimately the result isn't much different than if we ban them but the benefit is that they can't argue with us.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] snugglesthefalse@sh.itjust.works 20 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

Zionism is just a fucked way of thinking. Nothing gives you more right to a home than someone else.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] gon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

I never see pro-Zio stuff on c/buyfromeu. I don't interact much with feddit anyway, but I'm really not sure about this one.

[–] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Yeah I could agree with others, but c/buyfromeu seems off on the list.

That said, I'd probably vote for defederating whole feddit.org until their problems are solved, since it's just not a single comm that's problematic but the whole instance policy that's promoting zionism

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] PolarKraken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 2 weeks ago (18 children)

No. I have issues with how this is approached and communicated primarily, and if those are addressed maybe there is enough information to support. I'll try to keep it brief:

  1. There isn't really any indication about what we hope to achieve with the community bans. What concrete improvements do we hope for and are we taking any steps to see if they are achieved? It reads to me like a LOT of words explaining why they are utter shit (no disagreement), but then doesn't connect any further dots, seems to just imply "so clearly our users should not see those" or something.

  2. Frankly it's unclear to me why I see largely Flatworm proposing these lately, and little POV from the wider admin and mod team. It's no shade to you Flat, I like the cut of your jib. But this is an anarchist instance, if we are proposing rules that impact all our users, I need to start seeing a lot more broad weigh-in from the other people doing the work to keep this place running.


Now for both of these there are charitable interpretations for why I'm not seeing what I think I should. But I'm not willing to guess on that and shouldn't have to. This is frankly a totally insufficient basis, as written, for governance action. As written, I say absolutely not.

Leave my feed and default interactions alone please unless we are going to see better and wider justification.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] Octagon9561@lemmy.ml 19 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Pro complete defederation. Same reason instances don't federate with Nazi instances. Nazism and Zionism are both just different forms of fascism.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] goldyLocks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 2 weeks ago

NZS FCK OFF

ZIOS FCK OFF

[–] Nomad@infosec.pub 18 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Unsure if I'm allowed to participate here, so delete please if inappropriate.

I have always been of the impression that banning single accounts reactively to what they post is more work but also more impactful in terms of teaching people to view a problematic world view with the required precision in choosing to express their views.

On the one hand a blanket ban decreases engagement and encourages radicalization through isolation.

On the other hand would engaging with them allow people to see what precisely is a balanced take with precision to what you want to say.

You showed evidence from the modlog that exists only because people were able to engage, stopping that would reduce workload for mods but reduce engagement in political discussion.

Lastly, in this lost you went and made a more precisee statement about who needs fighting in Israel, which was encouraged by the modlog morsels. So again I ask: is that not useful? It teaches to avoid overgeneralization, which a lot of people need very much to learn.

Our German politicians for example. they, like most of our populace, react reflexively negative to anything anti Semitic. Because of our shared cultural shame around the genocide. On the other hand we see ideally politicians acting line we did back then and feel as uneasy as you do. So we do what Germans to, we find a more precise way to express what we see. Overgeneralization of redderic against Jews is bad, specification of anti Israeli genocide sentiment good.

I think it would be in the interest of your cause not to blanket ban and instead add another well balanced volunteer mod to your ranks. :)

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] 7U5K3N@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah ditch em. No space for folks like that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 18 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

I am not a member of your server, but I think it's amongst the top 4 best servers on the threadiverse. I have a great deal of respect for your server and the communities that have come to be on it. I would advise that when dealing with a -----bar on the fediverse, be that a nazi-bar, a zionist-bar, or any other kind of authoritarian-bar, the smaller concern isn't if there's things on it your users will miss (with the threadiverse, those things are communities) and the bigger concern is how the problem figures that have coagulated in that bar act and behave when they engage with the things originating on your server. I commend the desire to do this gracefully, but if you're going to limit yourselves to blocking communities (which will ultimately limit your own users more than feddit.org's users, though I'm not sure your users will be bothered or that their users will notice), I think you ABSOLUTELY MUST plan a period of time to revisit this. I'd probably say 1 month. If next month you feel that what you're seeing on your server is improved in the way you want it to, then leave it be, and if not then de-federate.

Otherwise, I would recommend immediate defederation if this is a recurring problem. These fediverse servers all act as garden parties. Blocking communities at other garden parties is less effective at combating bad behavior than not letting people through the gate in your garden. If this path is followed, I'd recommend maintaining channels of communication between the admins of both instances for 6 months to see if and how things change.

Again. I am not a member here. More of an outside observer with a ton of respect with a little bit of input after years of being in online spaces and having very little tolerance for bad faith behavior. You can take or reject these observations depending on how you align with them. Hell, I may even be full of shit. But one of us leftists' greatest weaknesses and greatest strength is our tolerance. The strength is in that it helps us build coalitions and confront our own biases. The weakness is that bad faith actors exploit this to string us along and keep making our spaces worse on purpose, so I tend to support a relatively strict federation/defederation policy and to let users find the admin teams that align best to their own desired defederation policy.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 16 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Ban 'em. If they want to host literal genocide enabling content. Its undeniable at this point and if you are still supporting Israel you can join them in Cocitus.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Hestia@hexbear.net 16 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Feddit

A little on the nose...

Hope you guys cut em loose.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TankieTanuki@hexbear.net 15 points 2 weeks ago

Israel is currently the most violent, fascist and genocidal nation state in the ~~Middle East~~ world

[–] Grainne@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Defed them entirely, we don’t need to allow a ZioNazi bar here.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DrFistington@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Ban anyone trying to foster a purely pro Zionist point of view

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›