Flatworm7591

No and I will talk to cryptagion about it.

It might be good to have the option of a right of reply in the modlog for the person being moderated, for each mod action?

Yeah I have removed it. I just don't understand where all the animosity is coming from in this case. It seems so misdirected. Can't win 'em all over I guess.

Out of nowhere HE chose to respond with telling me I am “infamous” due to a meme. Learn to read, it was open hostility.

I accept you experienced it as misogyny. But it looks to me like he only replied to you because you replied to him first. It was hardly "out of nowhere".

Last, no. It’s harassment or he wouldn’t say “infamous” about a post criticizing men and their inaction during fascist takeover (stop gaslighting).

Imo it's your hyperbolic language that has made you rather infamous around Lemmy. Not the fact you are a woman. And I have no problem with the language you use - a bit of hyperbole often makes the point more impactful.

If he is going to treat women like shit and push the patriarchy, then it can be reflected back at him.

That's a hypothetical. Yes, IF he did that then I'd completely agree with you. I just don't agree with you that's what happened.

You know immediately what wounds fascists by what they police and hate, and it’s fine to use that speech against them - so you can get them to agree that the patriarchy is bad and NO ONE should be enforcing gender roles on others. That’s the point.

The fact you are slinging words like 'fascist' around at _cryptagion tells me either you haven't bothered to read his post/comment history before making the accusation. He's one of those antifa types you libs love to hate on.

I get that this is your attempt to save face though. It doesn’t work to gaslight women who know your stupid lies and tricks. I noticed the lack of apology for the impact of what you did regardless of intent. https://harpers.org/archive/1941/08/who-goes-nazi/

I do apologize for posting your comment as a tagline, and I have removed it since that's what you asked me to do. Beyond that I don't think there's much to discuss.

Was never banned from here FYI.

This is the relevant link I think: https://lemmy.world/post/32343339/18042041

I totally get that Lemmy and the internet in general (and society in general) isn't as welcoming for women as it is for men, so I can totally empathize with where you are coming from here.

You cant even acknowledge that he [Trump] may seize fascist control of Wikipedia lol. You're weak mentally, you aren't going to war against anything. We can all see that. The men in this country are the most shameful, disappointing, pathetic things I've ever witnessed.

First, if you want me to remove the site tagline with your quote, I'll be happy to do so. Just let me know. Adding it really had nothing whatsoever to do with misogyny though - I added it because I [mostly] agree with the sentiment. I definitely enjoyed your hyperbolic turn of phrase. I also thought it would be a good fit with our other taglines. Did I also find it amusing? Yes, gotta admit, but a lot of our taglines get chosen because they are also funny in some way. In this case what was funny (to me) was the hyperbole, not the core message, and not the fact you are a woman. You can choose to believe that or not, of course, but I genuinely wasn't coming from that place.

Having read through the original thread, I don't think things went down quite as you have characterized it either. It looks like you accidentally replied to one of our users (@_cryptagion@anarchist.nexus) comments instead of replying to the OP. So that's how you got into the conversation with him in the first place. Then, you got angry with him when he mentioned we had used one of your comments as a tagline, made a bunch of assumptions about the reason why, and then started misgendering him for some reason? The removed comment was "eat shit" btw.

YDI, a clearcut case.

You deserved more

Enjoy your social media-free life buddy.

If your motivation is reducing human suffering then the two painless deaths are preferable. If your motivation is saving the most lives, then one painful death wins out. It's a tricky one because if reducing human suffering is your primary objective, it leads to the inevitable conclusion that the best option to reduce human suffering is to never exist in the first place, which isn't a very humanist conclusion. I think ethically I'd have to go for the one painful death then, but it would be hard to live with. My heart is telling me the two painless deaths would play on my conscience less.

I'll chat to the other admins for their thoughts on this.

Ok maybe I misunderstood your comment then.