Aceticon

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 minutes ago* (last edited 2 minutes ago)

A somewhat different version of that world and of characters similar to the one he's acting exists in the games.

When building a character for acting one bases oneself in the script to "fill-in the blanks" of "how would this person feel in these circumstances", based on things like the past of that person, the world around them and past events (sometimes actors using Method Action will even during rehearsal enact an important events of a character's past which are NOT on the script, just to try and get an impression of how that might have shaped that imaginary person).

So it still makes sense that now, after he built a character based on the script's version of that world and of people like that character in it, he would avoid different versions of that world and those people.

Mind you, he might just not be at all a gamer and this is just an excuse not to play the game. Then again he might genuinely want to avoid the negative side effects for his character building of being exposed to two different versions of the same world - it is a valid consideration for some actors. Only he knows if it's a genuine reason or just some bollocks he said to get fans of the games of his back.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Well, yeah, automated ultra-fast untiring shameless liars can do way more swindling of people than human politicians and are probably far better at it since they can interact with people one-on-one and swindle in a target-specific way, unlike politicians which relly on mass spreading of their declarations and the halo effect for their mass swindling.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

And found out filmset scenarios are filled with tricks that make it seem one thing to viewers whilst being something else, just like 3D worlds in games.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Another possibility is that the massive operation by Israel to get blackmail material on Western politicians doing things such as pedofilia also caught EBU members (or at least people who have power over said EBU members) on its net.

As the Epstein thing unravels more and more what we're seeing is that holding a ton of blackmail material gathered by operations like that (and the whole Epstein affair clearly shows that a lot of it would be pedofilia-related) is the best explanation for Israel's influence.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

You generally need a single person with the vision to maintain consistency throughout the whole series, and as far as I know that was not the case with Falout the games.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (2 children)

Yeah, it actually also makes sense for an actor to avoid seeing other films with that character if they're going to portray an entirelly new version of that character.

In Method Acting character building is a lot about what are the motivations and drives of the "person" which is the character and "living truthfully (the character's life) under imaginary circunstances" and judging by how he talks about it he is indeed using Method Acting.

As for games, they might be an even worse influence than previous films because the emotional depth of in game characters is generally zero or close to it (except in things like cutscenes were they used actors, MOCAP and a very detailed model for expressions), akin to a woden performance.

It's valid for an actor using Method Acting not to want to be exposed to a different representation of the world their character is supposed to inhabit and of the characters in that world - Method Acting is pretty "soft and smooshy" rather than a set of iron rules and mechanisms, relying on a person's own "emotional engine" and ability to pretty much forget that they're not that "person" which is the character living those things (think of it as an actor's version of suspension of disbelief) so who knows what influences the actor might take in subconsciously which then affect their embodyment of that character, which would be a bigger concern now that they've already embodied that character (for the last season of the series) and that should not change for actor reasons rather than character reasons (i.e. the character should only change due to things that happen to the character).

No doubt some actors would think that playing the game would make no difference, but it's valid for some to think it might.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 8 hours ago

Sounds like a pretty standard Method Acting way of going about it.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

It's Tradition

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Oh, I wouldn't at all be surprised if a lot of national delegates quietly and behind closed doors expressed a will for there not to be a public vote, since they did not want it their support for the Genocidal state of Israel to be on record and publicly known.

In Politics (and Eurovision is much more Politics than Art) many if not most things are really decided behind closed doors either without a vote or with a rigged vote - politicias abhor transparency and accountability.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 8 hours ago

Yeah, the amount of TV time spent on it is similar to the amount of TV time spent covering the European or World Football (soccer for Americans) Championships.

I suspect that without that overboard TV coverage almost literally shoving it down viewers throats, most people would forget about it.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 hours ago

Thanks for providing the seller point of view.

By "better option" I meant it for buyers, not sellers.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

In some distros Linux is already at the "just works" stage for gaming at home, at least for desktop PCs.

 

So apparently for lemmy.world mods pointing out that the word "anti-semite" is far more used than "antigypsyism, anti-Romanyism, antiziganism, ziganophobia, or Romaphobia” even though the Nazis targetted both Jews and Roma in the Holocaust, is, somehow, "Criticizing Jewish people as a whole".

Or maybe it's the whole "I don't care about any one specific race, I care about people and think it's always unjusct when people are treated differently based on things they were born with, such as race" that was deemed "Criticizing Jewish people as a whole".

Good old lemmy.world: they were called on it repeatedly so eventually walked back on the whole "criticizing Israel is anti-semitic" but apparently if you don't go along with the view that racism against a very specific group is much worse than racism against people from other groups, then you must be against that specific ethnic group.

My comment in text for reference:

All clearly as frequently used as "anti-semitism" /s

And yeah, I don't care about race, any race, I care about people, which includes that they're not unjustly treated for things that were not their choice, such as the race they were born into.

It's Racists who feel the need to care about a race or races, defending things for some races which they do noit defend for others, doing little performances about how others must care about those races too and that those who don't "are against those races" - for them race comes first, defining a person and dictating how they should be treated.

For Humanists race is something that should be of as little importance to how somebody is treated as the color of their eyes or how tall they are, and yet they see again and again race weponized by Racists to treat people differently even though those people haven't actually earned such treatment through their actions: in other words race fro Humanists is something that should be irrelevant yet has been turned by others into a pivot for injustice.

It's pretty obvious from your little performance which one you are

view more: next ›