Yeah great, let's be the flip side of the coin instead of a force for betterment in the world. Let's kill 23 year olds that barely have lived or learned at all and totally will never change in their lives.
Good bet, he will be dead in three years. But if maga fascism is out in three years remains to be seen.
Same. Most revolution overthrows a leader and instead of locking him up for good so he can't hurt anybody, they can't stop their mob justice and Lynch him instead. No need to kill them, just put them out to pasture.
But you are intolerant...?
Locking people up -> protecting society. Killing people -> doing the same as them just inverted.
Killing people does. Not. Work. And it isn't necessary.
Why is the us that obsessed with killing each other?
I just canceled an office space my company rented because they put up a TV in the kitchen playing ads. They refused to relent and we are moving out now.
Most synthetic sweeteners are considered scientifically rigorously tested and safe for consumption. :)
To be fair, for most shithole countries tourism is a beloved form of income. So they usually leave travelers alone. Even NK mostly. The US started violating that rule, that's why tourism is down massively.
Comparison is sadly not that good. Comparing cost per kWh is not great. Gas is instant power anywhere and solar is power generation if the sun shines. I'm massively pro solar, but without buffering ("storing") the power and its actual cost, this is just not accurate.
Can't have officials grab their ~~dick~~mommy's hand in public, so they get a supplement to hold on to.
Unsure if I'm allowed to participate here, so delete please if inappropriate.
I have always been of the impression that banning single accounts reactively to what they post is more work but also more impactful in terms of teaching people to view a problematic world view with the required precision in choosing to express their views.
On the one hand a blanket ban decreases engagement and encourages radicalization through isolation.
On the other hand would engaging with them allow people to see what precisely is a balanced take with precision to what you want to say.
You showed evidence from the modlog that exists only because people were able to engage, stopping that would reduce workload for mods but reduce engagement in political discussion.
Lastly, in this lost you went and made a more precisee statement about who needs fighting in Israel, which was encouraged by the modlog morsels. So again I ask: is that not useful? It teaches to avoid overgeneralization, which a lot of people need very much to learn.
Our German politicians for example. they, like most of our populace, react reflexively negative to anything anti Semitic. Because of our shared cultural shame around the genocide. On the other hand we see ideally politicians acting line we did back then and feel as uneasy as you do. So we do what Germans to, we find a more precise way to express what we see. Overgeneralization of redderic against Jews is bad, specification of anti Israeli genocide sentiment good.
I think it would be in the interest of your cause not to blanket ban and instead add another well balanced volunteer mod to your ranks. :)

Quark, Umsatzsteuerpflicht kommt bei viel höherem Einkommen und gewerblicher Absicht. Du schreibst die Einkünfte in die Einkommensteuer Erklärung rein und bezahlst bei einer kleinen Rente kaum Steuer darauf. Da gibt es ein Feld "Einkünfte aus Vermietung oder Verpachtung". Fertig