db0

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Lol, let's rehash gamergate in 2026, why not

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 10 hours ago

The difference is that you can curate the people you associate with. Find an instance whose values represent your own, or run your own, and you can avoid the people who you find the worst. You can't do this in reddit as anyone can join and you have no chance to prevent yourself from interacting with chuds.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 21 hours ago (4 children)

Actually, they lost their server, not their domain. They couldn't maintain the lemmy software ( I think the original admin lost interest or smt) and just gave up. They did open a failover comm for !freemediaheckyeah@lemmy.dbzer0.com but most of their active users didn't have an interest in participating in lemmy over discord and reddit.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 21 hours ago

The piracy comm was always in dbzer0 from day 1

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 21 hours ago

None of that is true. They were never defederated, nor did they receive a takedown (that I know of). They simply blocked the community out of an abundance of caution because they felt an image with a URL to the TLD of a pirate site is too risky.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 days ago

Please also reach out to the admins of another guarantee instance you trust to expedite this, as I doubt most admins visit this thread regularly. When you request a guarantee on fediseer, you can optionally specify which instance you want to guarantee for you, and their admins will receive a PM

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 days ago

We support open source/weight models running on local machine with FOSS software. We don't support corporate GenAI. E.g. see AI Horde

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

We support open source/weight models running on local machine with FOSS software. We don't support corporate GenAI.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 days ago

Watched all 3. Still have no idea what's happening. lol.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Which news? Which mods? Just post in YPTB is you're upset about it, why are you replying to me?

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Huh I hope it's uploaded to my tracker soon

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Is it out yet or are you opening this pre-emptively?

 

Cross-posted from "hell yeah" by @dickalan@lemmy.world in !fuckcars@lemmy.world


 

The video I linked for reference

I guess I was "sympathizing with invaders" because I said "Such an absolute waste of life, just for the vanity of one man."

Just patently ridiculous moderation...

 

Let's all get hyped for a revolution to get capitalist social democracy again. Yay!

 

I was watching a video yesterday which had a sponsor for deleteme which claims to go through data brokers to delete your info. I thought that might be a good idea, especially for those with radical politics. However it's fairly expensive (~200$) and also I mistrust sponsored links by default.

Have you used them? Have you used something else? What do you recommend people do to deal with the hundreds of data brokers which harvest your info? The point is not to disappear entirely, but pershaps to make it less easy for an employer, payment processor or whatever to blackllist you based on GenAI assessments etc.

 

Note I found one comment which works for me in there: https://huggingface.co/Lightricks/LTX-2.3/discussions/13#69b26bb65d8741ba168540b4

Use 0.987, 0.85, 0.725, 0.422, 0.0 in your upscaler sigmas. This seems to work for me, but ofc it adds one more step than before, so the speed is reduced. This works well if you're planning to re-use the last frame of the video to extend it or smt.

Another solution that works is to simply cut off the lat 18 frames from the video and make it 18 frames longer. Υou can just extract the last frame at the point of cutoff. What I do to avoid cutting off speech (if there is one), I might add "there's a moment of silence" in the end of my prompt. Then the cutoff frames don't interrupt anything

 

Cross-posted from "Is this true for you?" by @LadyButterfly@piefed.blahaj.zone in !autism@lemmy.world


264
Fair point (piefed.cdn.blahaj.zone)
 

Cross-posted from "Fair point" by @LadyButterfly@piefed.blahaj.zone in !autism@lemmy.world


 

Hello again peeps, I come back to you with more exciting news. After last months vote passed to accept quokk.au as a member of the FAF, the vote on their end only just marginally failed for a 1-vote tiebreaker. The primary reservation people expressed back then was not wanting to follow the FAF defederations/bans as many people chose quokk.au explicitly due to their defederation list, particularly of Marxist-Leninist-friendly instances like hexbear.

Given however that there was willingness from admins on both sides to collaborate and provide mutual aid to each other due to our shared values, we went back to the drawing board to find a compromise. The main issue was that we wanted a way where we didn't want to sacrifice the tight integration of the FAF proper, but there is also an option "softer" version of the flotilla integration, which is less technical and more political.

So we came down to having two different tiers of membership in the flotilla

Consorts: These are the fully integrated members of the FAF. For all accounts and purposes, they count as a single instance, as they follow the same rules, bans and federations and their members get voting rights on all proposals. I.e. the original vision I proposed.

Companions: These are the more politically-only aligned instances.

  • They don't have to follow the FAF defederations and bans so they have no say in those either. However companion instances can optionally chose to follow defederations and/or bans, which allows them to vote on them as well.
  • They can take part in the voting for rules which don't refer to deferations or bans, and they have to follow those rules (e.g. golden rules, radical admin recalls etc). They are also allowed to propose new rule changes as well for the whole FAF.
  • They get access to FAF private matrix channels and benefit from our resident technical expertise and moderation experiences.

Naturally a Companion instance can at any time become a Consort by simply on-boarding existing FAF defeds & bans and therefore immediately get future voting rights for those as well.

After we reached internal consensus on these two tiers, we then re-approached @Quokka@quokk.au to see if that would cover their reservations and we're today happy to announce that they've officially joined the FAF.

On a personal note: It's been always my passion to grow a system that is not only technically robust, but also politically as well, and the only way we can achieve this is by reinforcing the mutual aid ties between aligned actors, while providing enough independence for self-expression. This is yet another step in that direction and I hope it can lead to more versatile fediverse structures like feeler networks and whatnot.

 
view more: next ›