this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2026
704 points (97.6% liked)

Science Memes

19315 readers
715 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 279 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (4 children)
[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 82 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Turns out Benjamin Franklin had it right, and it was this time traveler that caused him to flip it to the wrong direction.

[–] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 30 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

While funny, this doesn't work because the time traveler told him specifically which one is negative.

[–] Jerkface@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago

"... Well now I'm not going to do it."

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 21 points 3 weeks ago

Damn time travelers, ~~always~~ ~~never~~ messing things up!

[–] SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world 22 points 3 weeks ago

Man, this one is a good one.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 20 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

IMHO Franklin is one of the few who would go straight to "what is it?" without blinking.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] orbitz@lemmy.ca 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Always love their comics but since I don't know crap about this stuff it's amusing to see how this one is relevant to a meme. Wish I knew more but only so much I've learned so far. One day perhaps but not today.

[–] helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world 32 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/Main_Page

The contributors on this site do an excellent job explaining the comics. Not really ELI5, but more ELI15.

It's okay to not understand every comic, someone else out there figured it out and explained it to us.

[–] orbitz@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Very much appreciated, thank you I'll never understand everything but I'd at least like to have a bit of an idea.of what I can.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Console_Modder@sh.itjust.works 97 points 3 weeks ago (9 children)

You just have to ignore the existence of electron flow. Conventional current flow is all that matters, and the only people who use electron flow are those who design integrated circuits and lunatics

[–] ch00f@lemmy.world 72 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

You forgot science enthusiasts who are desperately trying to impress people.

[–] Console_Modder@sh.itjust.works 90 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

They get lumped in with the lunatics

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 28 points 3 weeks ago

We don't want 'em.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 17 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You mean to tell me that there are people out there whose job it is to design lunatics?

That's fucking awesome. Like a real-life comic book author.

[–] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 10 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's also useful to think of the "ground" plane as a sort of well of potential charger carriers that the conventional current model overlooks. Aside from simultaneously visualising what's happening inside simple ICs like BJTs / MOSFETs and the circuit diagrams I've found it a useful way for checking for common mode noise in circuit and PCB design.

I guess this makes me a lunatic? Don't know until we test it;

Someone give me an ~~asylum~~ makerspace to takeover!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BartyDeCanter@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 3 weeks ago

Are you implying there there are IC designers who aren’t lunatics?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] TheRealKuni@piefed.social 59 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

And that’s why we have positrons instead of the much-cooler-sounding negatrons.

[–] MajorMajormajormajor@lemmy.ca 45 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Man, they have positrons and negatrons now? The Transformers franchise is wild.

[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

We gotta keep them out of sports, they are too strong.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 8 points 3 weeks ago

Oddly when it came time to negotiations, they somehow realized actually calling yourself a Decepticon, was not a good name for inspiring trust.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ThomasWilliams@lemmy.world 55 points 3 weeks ago (13 children)

The current does flow from positive to negative. Electricity is not the flow of electrons - they just generate the field that the electric wave flows through. The electrons don't actually move very far. The wave flows outside of the wire, not in it.

[–] umt@lemmynsfw.com 8 points 3 weeks ago
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] morto@piefed.social 51 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

"all models are wrong, but some are useful"

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 44 points 3 weeks ago (18 children)

Most circuit diagrams do not draw current flowing in any direction at all. It's just labeled + and -. I don't see anything wrong with this.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] _druid@sh.itjust.works 25 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

But then I get to talk about all those holes flowing.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Uhhhh......pornhub is that way ----->

[–] _druid@sh.itjust.works 16 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Wait, no, but first, imagine marbles in a straw!

[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Pornhub is that way ----->

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago

Imagine a chain getting tugged back and forth

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] j4yc33@piefed.social 19 points 3 weeks ago

OMG-O-S-H every circuit designed with conventional current just exploded because of your revelation here.

/s

My friend, this is the same branch of science that got us to space with calculations assuming spherical cows.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 17 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Couldn't you fix this by also defining electrons as positive? Imo the physicists and electrical engineers should fight it out.

[–] Console_Modder@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The physicists are absolutely right. However, I reject their reality and substitute my own

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 15 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

So, it doesn't actually change anything; everything still works the same.

But textbooks need to be thrown away and remade, every circuit diagram, every electrical engineering plan, decades of research and research papers have to be combed and corrected, or accept that they're wrong.

While technically possible, it would create colossal risk and unending chaos and It's environmentally unsound, for something that doesn't change anything in the end.

Lazy is not checking your mail.

Refusing to turn reality on its head for a null change in the end is something else entirely.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] bandwidthcrisis@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

While we're at it, is a compass needle's North pole actually a South so that it points North? Or is the Earth's North pole actually South so that the needle's North pole points to it?

(I know that I could look this up, I just want to confuse people.)

[–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 3 weeks ago

But that's by design, while this is a convention problem

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Eh, i've struggled with this for years but eventually found my peace.

You see, there's two types of electric current: Electrons moving through a wire, and protons moving through water (the second one is also called a pH gradient, it happens e.g. in cell membranes of chloroplasts, fascinating stuff, check it out).

Basically plants do photosynthesis, which is extremely similar to what solar panels do. They generate an electric current, and in that current, positive charges move, so the "direction of current flow" is the correct one.

I have come to accept that the current inside living beings is more important than the current in all the machinery, because without life there would be no machinery, so life deserves to get the "correct" current.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

True, but most of laws, equations etc still work and only specific fields need to adjust for this.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nomen_dubium@startrek.website 8 points 3 weeks ago

feels like this should be a skeletor quote!

[–] Riverside@reddthat.com 8 points 3 weeks ago

Currents aren't drawn incorrectly. Electrons do move backwards, but since their electric charge is negative, the current goes the correct way.

[–] IntriguedIceberg@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Could someone explain what makes one pole negative/positive? Like, could we have named them Alice/Bob or is there a specific reason we went with +/-?

[–] Dalvoron@lemmy.zip 9 points 3 weeks ago

Guessing here, but +/- is good for describing them as binary opposites as that system already exists. This is a good thing assuming there are two types of charge/pole which behave in opposite ways (Eg move differently in a field). It's also just good to use numbers so that we can describe the amount of + and the amount of -, which numbers already do. It also allows us to describe neutral as neither + nor -, but 0. Again, we already have a scaffold there for numbers and it's easy to copy it for new things when that makes sense.

[–] Donjuanme@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

Magnets.

If there's no field there's 0, if there's a magnetic field clockwise it makes a positive charge, if there's a magnetic field rotating counterclockwise it makes a negative charge,

Likewise if there's a positive charge it makes a clockwise magnetic field and if there's a negative charge it makes a counter clockwise field. (I may be backwards +/- clockwise/counter clockwise, something about the thumb on my left hand..., but really it's all arbitrarily named, but the reason you just say negative or positive is that those are scalable measures, you can't have half a Bob or 2 Alice. )

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Zacryon@feddit.org 7 points 3 weeks ago

Doesn't matter in a lot of cases. Just state the flow direction and convention once and then stick with it.

load more comments
view more: next ›