this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2026
232 points (94.3% liked)

News

34550 readers
3231 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 minutes ago

Buy our fighter jets or we'll send you fighter jets

[–] roserose56@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 hours ago
[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 28 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

Everybody calm down. USA and Canada have an agreement allowing them to enter each other's air space. They said that if Canada doesn't buy enough F-35s USA will have to send more jests into Canada's airspace to fill in the gaps. That's it. It's not "buy our jets or we will invade you". It's "if Canada doesn't buy F-35 we will have to do more work in our agreement".

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 1 points 14 minutes ago (1 children)

But why isn't Canada allowed to use whatever other jets it buys for that? Why does it have to be American made f-35s?

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 1 points 6 minutes ago

But Hoekstra warned that if Canada chooses to purchase Saab’s Gripen E jets, the U.S. would still need to reconsider how it works with its northern neighbor on security.

“If they decide they’re going with an inferior product that is not as interchangeable, interoperable as what the F-35 is, that changes our defense capability,” Hoekstra said.

“And as such, we have to figure out how we’re going to replace that,” the ambassador added.

They are just saying that if Canada changes its plans US will have to adapt. Looking at what's happening in Greenland this can be somehow considered as a threat (if you can't defend yourself we will have to take over...) but it's really a stretch. US will probably decide to deploy more F-35s there or something which makes total sense.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 7 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

This community really needs a clickbait title flagging process.

[–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Our media needs to fucking quit the click baity titles.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Cute, but its obvious everybody checks replies first and you do so specifically to avoid giving clicks to bad actors so they can draw people in to sell ads

Bad headlines will get worse if you RTFA after falling for the clickbait. The incentives are fucked.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

That's why some of us have to do the hard work of reading before replying.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Which is why a flagging process creates a better incentive loop and reduces stupid incentives.

[–] boletus@infosec.pub 8 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

You are right. The title is so misleading and I can't believe someone with the title journalist on their resume wrote it.

[–] filcuk@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 hours ago

They've used everything they've learned to twist the words into bait

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Title is bad. Is there a not a moderation rule for summarizing articles with clickbait titles in this community?

This is an article about NORAD.

[–] slothrop@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 hour ago

See rule #4!

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 34 points 7 hours ago

What

Buy our fighters jets or we invade with fighter jets ?

What absolute fuck is wrong with this country

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago

Still think he's sane?

[–] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 10 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

wut.

If you don’t buy from me, I’ll bomb you.

[–] PointyFluff@lemmy.ml 9 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (2 children)

pretty classic US negotiating technique, actually; just normally used against "brown" countries.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 6 points 6 hours ago

Yeah but they also threatened to invade Greenland / Iceland (because apparently they're the same country). That didn't end up happening so I don't think Canada has a lot to worry about.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 124 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

So if they don't buy any we're just gonna give them out free? That's dumb.

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 51 points 12 hours ago

The Art of the Deal.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SirMaple__@lemmy.ca 9 points 7 hours ago
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago

This is just....bonkers.

[–] sommerset@thelemmy.club 13 points 8 hours ago

I mean it's always been like this basically.
But less publicly

[–] Zarajevo@feddit.org 2 points 5 hours ago

If it is the only way to sell US goods..

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 70 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

This is just robbery, we weren't able to make our schedule and modified the price. "$27.7 billion in cost – up from its initial $19 billion."

Yet expect them to just give us $7 billion dollars because we failed to meet the contract?

This is how the mafia works. Its the only business trump knows.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 20 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Duh. That's how extortion works.

You think the mob ever delivered anything on time and under budget?

[–] Archer@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Now I want a short story where the Mob accidentally hires the most effective project manager ever

[–] Thassodar@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 hours ago

There's actually an anime where a corporate worker gets summoned into another world because they need him to use his efficiency to get their shit together.

It's called "Headhunted to Another World: From Salaryman to Big Four!", and it's pretty good.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 32 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

Canada could do something really funny and start buying chinese anti-aircraft missiles.

[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 15 points 9 hours ago (7 children)

Close. We should build our own, and if we happen to violate Chinese IP along the way, oh well.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Or just work with MBDA and Thales to set up a domestic production lines for Meteor and SAMP/T. And then collaborate with Europe more on aerospace and defense. And then make some deals with Korea and Poland for some of their hardware that they’re currently churning out. And then set up a joint production and rapid iteration project with Ukraine, since they’re essentially the best in the world at that shit these days. And then talk to France, Germany, Sweden, and/or Japan about getting some attack subs and perhaps SSGNs.

There’s lots of possibilities once you free yourself from the economic yoke of the US. We did kinda wreck your defense aerospace industry (the Avro Arrow was the absolute tits, and it’s a damn shame we crushed the project). But now’s a great time to reinvest in that stuff.

[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 hours ago

A solid plan.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 5 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Could we possibly exchange the F-35s for store credit and purchase some healthcare to send back info America?

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

It’ll just go to employ more ICE

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 45 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

“Give us money or we will attack you” is generally not something you say to an ally you want to keep. Trump is literally insane, trying to start WW3.

[–] smeenz@lemmy.nz 8 points 7 hours ago

In his narcissistic mind, everyone else is just there for him to exploit. He literally can not comprehend any other way to do things.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 15 points 9 hours ago

It's extortion, the only thing trump knows...

[–] xyro@morbier.foo 52 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

"Buy or weapons or else..." Maybe we should look for a more reliable supplier and close our airspace to their jet fighters.

[–] MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca 46 points 12 hours ago (8 children)

That’s technically a declaration of war, right?

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 7 points 7 hours ago

NORAD already has shared skies provisions. US jets can fly into our airspace as needed to intercept foreign attackers. We can do the same with them.

None of this constitutes a threat, despite Hoekstra's weird, fumbling attempt to deliver it like one.

He basically said "If you don't give us your business, we'll have no choice but to protect your airspace even harder!" Oh, wow, scary. No, please, don't do that.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 42 points 12 hours ago

Call his bluff.

load more comments
view more: next ›