echodot

Why would that be bad?

Complaining about it makes Russia look pathetic.

You know what you are absolutely right — Organisations are indeed falling for what is known as the doorman fallacy: reducing rich and complex human roles to a single task and replacing people with AI. This overlooks the nuanced interactions and adaptability humans bring to their work.

It's not the American spelling of labour it's the incorrect spelling of the party name.

These numbers are a bit daft to consider in isolation.

Badenoch is completely useless, and way to far the right of traditional conservative values. But she's also not got a snowball's chance in hell of ever becoming PM so people aren't as bothered by her as they would be if she was actually in charge doing these things.

In much the same way that no one would really care about starmer if he wasn't prime minister. The trouble is he is prime minister.

If it worked the way that it does in sci-fi I'd have no problem with it. If it could give us cures for cancer and reactionless drives everyone would be happy.

But it doesn't work like that and if they keep going along the lines of Large Language Models it'll never work like that. AI as it is right now is a barely functional toy that is being misused by virtually everyone and major businesses alike.

I am perfectly happy for AI research to continue but they need to be realistic about its capabilities and be honest about their valuations of companies. AI research should still be at the level of "in the lab", it is definitely not a product that should be commercially available yet.

It's the CEO that's claiming the technology is ready for prime time. Remember the board fired him at one point, presumably because he was suppressing information. The problem was they went about it in as stupid a way as possible, and ended up becoming pariahs because they were not public about what they were doing, and making it look like a power grab. But still they were probably right to fire him.

The thing is if space-based manufacturing became the norm then it would cease to be impractical to implement regulations and oversight. The reason it's difficult to do now is because getting to spaces difficult, but for space-based manufacturing to be feasible that problem already has to be solved.

I'm just confused about what products can be manufactured completely autonomously, in a 0G environment, and are profitable enough to make space-based manufacture economical.

It's only Chicago style if it's made in the Chicago region of France. Otherwise it's just Domino's.

I haven't heard of anything on the list until we get to 8, and I only recognise the name I have no idea what the gameplay is like.

I've heard of four of the games on the list and it's the four you would think.

Except that's not how the law works.

If you want the law to work it has to be logically enforceable if it isn't logically enforceable it will get challenged in court.