echodot

joined 2 years ago
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 31 minutes ago* (last edited 30 minutes ago)

I think people's biggest fear with paying for the apps is that they'll end up in a situation where they are just throwing good money after bad and not getting anything for it. Then you get into the sunk cost fallacy and it's really difficult to get yourself out of that headspace.

The problem is the apps say that they have recommendations that you only have to pay to unlock but I don't believe them.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 34 minutes ago

Yeah and they all suck as a result.

I keep meaning to have a proper look into it and see if there are any actual dating site / apps that are independent. It's a massive pain because usually you can't really tell if an app is going to be any good or if it's just another clone until after you've already signed up. It's quite the time investment.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 39 minutes ago

There are of course things like hobby clubs you can join but you have to get lucky with those. There risk that you will just be distracted and end up with an expensive hobby.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 6 points 42 minutes ago

Yeah but that's not dating that's a hookup. Completely different ball game. Much easier to maintain a facade for a couple of days when both parties know that there is no potential for relationship.

Actual dating requires you to maintain for the long haul.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 48 minutes ago* (last edited 47 minutes ago) (2 children)

So if a person struggles with confidence your solution is for them to stand upon stage? There seems to be an important first step that seems to have been skipped.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 53 minutes ago

The most annoying thing about the self checkout is the need for you to put the entirety of your shopping on the time you weighing plate to make sure that I'm not buying my weekly shop but then sneaking a bottle of water past the system.

At least the IKEA self checkouts don't do that. They let me buy my Pœlēøïng in peace

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Assuming we ever actually get a price. Still no word on that.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 4 points 3 hours ago

Because he's a petulant man child who not only does he not think two moves ahead, he doesn't even think about the current move. You could go all the way back into human pre-history and struggle to find a more useless person.

He really cannot understand the concept of "No"

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 3 hours ago

Well it was 90 years ago, which in American history is the same as about 500 years everyone else.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 3 hours ago

I'm so confused by this world war 2 in reverse we seem to be doing. Who's attacking pearl harbor this time around, is it Europe?

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 7 points 14 hours ago

Honestly the most surprising part of all of that was that they're hiring women. These thugs tend to be every -ist they can find, including sexist.

It would be funny if they end up hiring too many normal people and as a result the whole thing falls apart.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 1 day ago

I can't remember the exact quote but it's something along the lines of the path to hell is lined with people who stayed and tried to do a good thing in a bad world.

Sometimes all you can do is quit.

 

When you reveal a spoiler the black rectangles go away and it then renders the text in white, but on a white background (light coloured theme) The text renders is exactly the same colour as the background and so you can not see it unless you highlight the post, this renders the background of the post as light grey and there is just about enough contrast difference to now read the text.

When spoiler text is revealed it should render in the same colour as normal text. I'm not sure why it's white.

See images below for demonstration.

spoiler text is hidden

spoiler text has been revealed but is invisible

text post is highlighted and now you can see the spoiler text rendered in white

view more: next ›