Anytime anybody tells you "I don't do drama", 99% of the time they are the cause of all the drama.
Actually chill people pretty much never bring it up.
Anytime anybody tells you "I don't do drama", 99% of the time they are the cause of all the drama.
Actually chill people pretty much never bring it up.
The problem is if you're being attacked by a swarm of angry bees your giant stick used for attacking humans isn't much use. The US likes to criticise other countries for under spending on their military but they themselves haven't used their military funding to maximum efficiency either.
Trump is talking about building a new kind of battleship despite them being completely useless in any contemporary war.
The US hasn't really invested in anti-drone weapons, despite the obvious risk they pose as demonstrated in Ukraine.
So instead they're trying to blow up a $200 drone with a multi-million dollar missile, and they don't even have a 100% hit rate. Things like RF jammers, real big nets, and big foam darts would be just as effective if not more so as they could take up multiple target simultaneously, and considerably cheaper and reusable. But nope.
Surely you are not trying to suggest that the US went into this with absolutely no plan whatsoever?
Yep I couldn't understand why they chose to use Roman notation. To be honest though 11 is a weird age cut off to have picked.
Spain is under absolutely no obligation to get involved in this entirely manufactured and utterly unnecessary war.
How heavy are the stones?
You don't know anything about software development do you.
Great so now I need both a new motherboard and a new CPU also it can install the operating system and I can then not use the AI features because I don't want them. Especially stupid because I can already use AI if I wanted without having to get an NPU by going on Microsoft's own AI website.
I can't see corporations going for this.
No under the NATO definition of peace.
Copy editing won't be an executive's job. But yeah, they didn't do the bare minimum which is concerning, it seems to indicate that they may not do the bare minimum on all of their articles. How much stuff went undiscovered?
I'm not going to outright say that journalist shouldn't use AI to write articles, because it's basically an enforceable rule, but there should be someone at some point whose ultimate responsibility is to make sure that the articles are at least factual, whether they were written by a human or not. Determining whether a quote is legitimate is pretty easy, you just have to Google the quote, if you can't find any other sources you start to ask questions. As I said it's the bare minimum they could have done.
I think it's incel for having a shower.