You need to learn what sociopath means.
This is a dumb test. How people react in VR is not relevant to the real world.
You need to learn what sociopath means.
This is a dumb test. How people react in VR is not relevant to the real world.
Where did I make that arguement.
VR is not the real world. It's not the holiday so you can't turn off safety protocols to simulate real world threats.
0% chance any of it has come to visit
0% chance any intelligent aliens have come to visit. There is a non-0% chance that there have been some microbes on an asteroid. There are some variations on the panspermia theory that suggest that life didn't even originate in this star system. There's no evidence for any of it of course but it's possible.
Blame LTT for that. They're the ones that put out the initial idea that corporations might buy them thus valve cannot sell them at a loss.
When I first heard them say that I initially thought "yeah that makes sense". But after a while of thinking about it, no it doesn't make any sense at all, I have no idea why he said that.
Most corporations just buy laptops and then the world's cheapest docking stations. So would have to be cheaper than a mid-tier laptop and I can't see that being likely.
It's hard to benchmark because it's running on a weird system architecture that no one's ever really seen before.
On paper it should be at least as good as the quest, possibly a little bit more powerful. But there's an awful lot of optimisation opportunities possible on ARM, but we don't know if they will be initially realised. Of course you can also run it in display mode in which case it's as powerful as the PC it's paired with. At which point only really care about is the screen, comparable to the quest, the lenses which aren't good as the quests, and the tracking which is probably quite a lot better than the quest. Also when it is paired to a computer it's done so via 6G wireless rather than a cable, so that's quite a lot more convenient.
The steam frame also has an expansion port, which is a new concept for VR headsets so we'll see what ends up happening with that.
That's not centralism that's just demanding reasonability from government.
Extremists from both sides of the political spectrum tend not to exist in the real world, so it's not hard to be against them.
It's perfectly acceptable to argue that both sides have a good point, provided that both sides actually do have a good point. However often times, one side (usually the right but not always) have a policy of been actually cartoonishly evil. How do you both sides that? Obviously you cannot so any attempt to do so gets you branded as a useless fence sitter.
So when people say they don't like centralists, that's the reason, because they do stuff like that and refuse to accept that sometimes one side is actually right.
I think the point is to make it difficult for Putin to lie to his people and tell them that the war is going well. It's hard to cover up an actual blackout.
Yeah which is exactly why it's not happening. You'll notice there's no source provided because it's just some scaremongering tactic that idiots like to post online trying to generate some controversy out of thin air, because they're bored.
Labour or are quite shit it is to be said, but they're not suicidally stupid. Which this is.
Do you have a sauce for that?
That seems way too draconian for labour to be able to get away with.
Firstly it's not going to happen this is just something someone's claim to they can make a thread. Zero sources posted.
Secondly I'd like to see you craft a law that allows corporate VPNs but not private VPNs and doesn't have any loopholes in it.
I did read it. It's very very long though have you read all of it, I started to get bored when they started showing really complicated diagrams with no real explanation as to how they came to those conclusions.
Social studies is like that, it's very much couched in the sort of science that you would normally expect of physics or engineering but all it's conclusions are fuzzy but they come out with these concrete graphs to explain very personal responses. I find it to be intellectually dishonest to suggest that you can represent the world like that