Or the other way. She can pleasure the husband while he's showering and she is on the John
FireRetardant
Canadian chiming in here. Many of our old timers also have guns, they are just responsible enough to not shoot uber drivers. The question is not why did he have a gun but why did he use it in this manner.
I doubt it won't make much of a mess. My shower had a few leaky spots of caulking and that was enough to ruin the floors.
Plus 61 is still younger than retirement age. Maybe they tapped out of a different career or wanted something a little simpler before going for a full retirement. Maybe they were a cabbie and prefers uber as they has more control over their schedule.
I don't see how this changes anything. My guess is someone in a wheel chair would use the hand held showerhead more often, which means while maneuvering the shower, it would be possible to accidently spray right out that hole and soak the bathroom.
Wouldn't this also let water out and on to the floor? Surely a sliding or hinged opening couldn't have been that hard to implement
Given the current treatment the USA is giving their own people, i could see them implementing nationwide policies to root out Canadian resistance and provide incentives for people to rat out insurgents. I'm not certain decades of sabotage would happen, especially considering how similar their cultures are. I'd imagine most insurgents behavior would stop with 5 years of the surrender and the vast majority of Canadians would accept their new reality. Any remaining incidents would be so infrequent the other violences inherrent in america would drown them out.
Greenland would be a valuable asset for either a military invasion or a trade embargo on Canada.
I think it entirely depends on how agressively the USA wants Canada. The wars in the middle east would look like a play date compared to a legitmate aggressive invasion of a neighbouring nation. I fully believe the Canadians would put up a damn good fight and insurrection, but life wouldn't be pleasant for many and as we've seen from America's track record, many non combatants will be caught in the crossfire.
You can call the cheif firearms office and report individuals you belive to be unfit to safely own guns. The authorities will typically follow up with various interviews, maybe a compliance check for storage etc and could take their guns and lisence away if they deem him unfit to own them.
Straight, cis men cause a hell of a lot more problems statistically than any trans person, yet we don't see Republicans calling for them to be banned.
Well obviously you are supposed to straddle the toilet and face the wall to get a better reach