this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2025
416 points (95.2% liked)

Microblog Memes

9985 readers
2044 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] placebo@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 hour ago

Regarding fear, our results show that this emotion is higher in the catcalling situation, however, there is no significant difference with the control condition. This suggests that experiencing an urban underground environment at night from a woman’s perspective is inherently fear-inducing, independent of explicit harassment.

Does it, though? It would be better if they had a control group where participants used a male avatar. My understanding is that both groups used female avatars:

In the experimental condition, the avatars used typical Italian catcalling expressions (documented in newspaper articles and sociological research on the topic of verbal street harassment), while in the control group (condition), the avatars posed general questions to the participants.

I have no doubt that it can be scary for a woman to be in this setting in real life. However, I'd like to see scientific proof that this feeling can be specifically induced in men who are controlling female characters in VR. Right now, it's more of an assumption, isn't it? As a gamer, I know that the location itself can be scary, that sound design (music, ambient sounds, voice acting) can be frightening, and that trying VR for the first time can also be uncomfortable.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 12 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (2 children)

Oh this is such nonsense.

They basically decided "what if we tested a scenario that has been happening in ChatVR for about 10 years."

When I play a shooting game in VR I don't think I'm going to die, I do not experience fear. Any claims along those lines are at best overstated and at worst straight up lies.

Also what's this research supposed to prove anyway?

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 7 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Ah yes, the ever popular "I've never experienced it, so it doesn't exist" argument.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk -2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Where did I make that arguement.

VR is not the real world. It's not the holiday so you can't turn off safety protocols to simulate real world threats.

[–] electricyarn@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Perhaps you are a sociopath?

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

You need to learn what sociopath means.

This is a dumb test. How people react in VR is not relevant to the real world.

[–] Wren@lemmy.today 1 points 19 minutes ago

So dumb. They stupidly cited studies about how the same therapy has applied to the real world, and other possible applications. They even had a section about testing embodiment in their VR scenario, talked about neurology, and used multiple metrics to compare the before and after for both groups.

I guess anything can be dumb if you don't read it.

[–] FlyingSpaceCow@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 hour ago

Irrelevant is too strong a word given the opportunities in VR for training or even therapy... but you have a point.

[–] yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de 48 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

I wish they had tested all 8 scenarios: Male/female participant, male/female body, catcalled/not catcalled.

Because even as a man I don't feel comfortable being alone at a subway station at night. Nor can I imagine would I then enjoy being catcalled.

I wonder how much your VR body seen in a mirror affects this. My gut says not a lot but more data would've been great.

Now, if your own VR body does affect your reaction there must be bodies which maximize/minimize reactions. That'd be fun to test. You don't even have to limit yourself to human bodies, what if you're, say, a dinosaur (with body height still being the same)?

[–] anamethatisnt@sopuli.xyz 3 points 49 minutes ago

While my first reaction was the same - "how would they react in male avatars?", that doesn't seem to be the point at all of this study but rather the potential of VR to change the subjects behaviour in real life by helping empathy along.

Introduction
[...]
Peck et al.13 found that White participants, after embodying a Black avatar, showed a reduction in implicit racial bias.
This principle has been extended to the context of gender-based violence.
Seinfeld et al.14 had male offenders embody a female victim of domestic violence, finding that the VR experience significantly improved their ability to recognize fear in female facial expressions—a deficit common in violent offenders15.
Similarly, other studies using 360° videos and immersive scenarios of sexual harassment have reported marked increases in empathy and changes in violent attitudes among participants16.
[...]
These findings collectively affirm the potential of VR as a rehabilitative tool for enhancing emotional understanding and mitigating harmful behaviors.

Building on this foundation, the present study utilizes immersive VR to provide male participants with a firsthand experience of catcalling.
While previous research has often focused on overt violence, our goal is to investigate the affective response to a more commonplace form of street harassment. We hypothesize that this embodied experience will elicit morally salient emotions like disgust and anger19,20,21.
By inducing this moral discomfort, the intervention aims to foster self-awareness and encourage a reconsideration of the behavior’s impact22, serving as a potential strategy to promote behavioral change.

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 11 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

But that would be actual science and not whatever the slop study in the article is.

[–] greygore@lemmy.world 13 points 4 hours ago (5 children)

I feel like if you’re going to slag off the study as “slop” you should at least follow the links to the study itself where you can see that they did in fact have a control group who were posed general questions instead of catcalling. They didn’t switch genders because that wasn’t the purpose of the study.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Wren@lemmy.today 16 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Interesting experiment.

The article on Phys.org

The paper on Nature.com

Some very condensed info:

Women disproportionately experience gender based violence and aggression in the wild. Researchers wanted to see if the experience of men being harassed and catcalled in a woman's avatar could promote empathy and understanding. This experiment on 36 male students (average age of 23) was based on other studies that found similar results, including a study on male offenders of gender based violence — to test if first-person VR experiences as women could increase pro-social behaviors.

The students had "no prior experience" with interpersonal aggression or catcalling as victims or perpetrators, measured on a scale with a maximum threshold.

The scene began in a bedroom, where participants were able to move and see themselves as their avatar in a mirror.

In a control group, the participants were asked innocuous questions instead of being catcalled.

Edit: For anyone asking: Why didn't they study why men don't feel safe? You can look up and post those studies. Nothing is stopping you. This is about the prosocial effects of this VR scenario. Need more support? !mensliberation@lemmy.ca and !mensmentalhealth@lemmy.world are two great communities to discuss men's issues.

[–] udon@lemmy.world 19 points 8 hours ago

Kind of unfortunate, that even here on lemmy most comments immediately flip to "but as a man I also feel scared". True, but it's not what this study is about. Maybe in 2026 we can try to just read something like this and take it as a prompt that, maybe, some things are not about us. Maybe we should do something about catcalling. We can talk about violence against men and loneliness at a different occasion.

Living in Japan, the country famous for being completely safe for everyone, this gap recently became clearer to me. As it turns out, when people talk about safety in Japan, they primarily mean that you won't be beaten up and nobody steals your wallet. But there are so many weird creeps around here. I'm really quite happy I don't live here as a woman.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago

Male American here. Always had a hard time internalizing women's fear, hard to truly put myself in their shoes. My first wife really woke me.

At the major hospital she worked at, the female nurses often needed escorts through the parking garage. There were alerts about shady characters hanging around. She clearly got roofied one night, and when her friends compared notes, it had happened to many of them at that same restaurant (a really nice one!).

I was a small guy, little punker in the late 80s and early 90s. There were places we couldn't go or the skins or rednecks would get us. And yet that doesn't even begin to compare with the fear women must deal with.

I've had a pretty fucking wild life, but I've never been stalked, drugged or raped.

[–] yucandu@lemmy.world 49 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Did anyone study the opposite? I remember reading about a woman that pretended to be a man for a few weeks to write a book about it, and she described it as something like "soul crushingly lonely".

[–] Meron35@lemmy.world 14 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Norah Vincent. She was particularly beloved by the manosphere because her experience pretending to be a man for 18 months (not just a few weeks) lead to her "conversion" from a feminist to realising that men too have their own problems.

Thought, she personally was already libertarian, and highly critical of trans people, so she reads more like a TERF imo.

Sadly passed away via assisted suicide a few years ago.

Norah Vincent - Wikipedia - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norah_Vincent

[–] msage@programming.dev 1 points 8 minutes ago

Which is super ironic, as feminism acknowledges mens issues.

[–] Mothra@mander.xyz 11 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

I haven't read this study but what matters to me is, are these same men catcallers themselves? Most men I know don't catcall and already understand it's unpleasant so I'm not surprised this is their reaction

[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 1 points 53 minutes ago

The study checked this and found that the participants claimed to have no history of catcalling.

The study was intended to see if men would experience greater empathy with women following a VR experience of catcalling.

Peer pressure is a real thing and telling other men that their behaviour is not OK can have real impact.

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

There’s a numerical asymmetry to stuff like this. You could have only 1 in 1000 men be catcallers yet a single catcaller could catcall thousands of women on their way to work (stereotypically from a construction site as they walk by).

[–] Breezy@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Having done construction with temps who did this, they indeed catcall anything that looks like a female. 2 different people were like this and i yelled at both to no avail. They were also just ahitty people to even talk to. I had both of them black listed after one day.

[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 2 points 52 minutes ago (1 children)
[–] Breezy@lemmy.world 1 points 5 minutes ago

Idk why but when i read this, then reread everything else i said, you just sounded like the sassy black girl i work with and i couldn't help but smile.

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Construction often ends up with the worst sorts of people. I have multiple friends and family who have worked in the business and they’ve dealt with people who would regularly no-show (not even call in sick), show up drunk, high on meth, and do all kinds of dangerous / stupid stuff including throwing heavy tools down from upper floors, walking around without paying attention (and falling off scaffolding etc).

My uncle also had to deal with mafia guys involved with construction unions.

[–] Breezy@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

The ones on meth are some of the best workers though. Get them on a task and it goes by fast.

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

If they’ve got ADHD. Then the meth is literally self-medicating them and allowing them to function. Non-ADHD people on meth are a different story.

[–] Breezy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

I completely agree. Ive worked with both types but i dont think the problematic ones are always non adhd. It has to deal with how much meth you consume, because one meth is fine for anyone. But five meths is to much for anyone.

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 36 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

Half Life 2 graphics for maximum immersion

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 21 points 11 hours ago (1 children)
[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 hours ago

bends over

"Nice!"

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch 82 points 14 hours ago (2 children)
[–] HexesofVexes@lemmy.world 30 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-19418-4.pdf

Paper itself above. Need a deeper reading with my notes but on the surface the stats are so-so. They check normality, but don't confirm linearity (use of pmcc will not be valid without - there are also a few other conditions to check for hypothesis testing with PMCC if memory serves), use of a continuous test (PMCC, ANOVA, unpaired t's) for discrete (likert) data is also little controversial, but generally condoned.

As for the conclusion, not a psych phd so I'll assume they know their stuff!

[–] colonelp4nic@lemmy.world 10 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

my personal rule of thumb is that if it's published in Nature, Cell, or another well-regarded journal, the statistical and experimental methodologies are almost certainly solid. Do you think I should adjust that rule going forward?

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 3 hours ago

sometimes, but they have retracted quite a few papers based on misleading papers, or even AI rgenerated. also because it can mislead readers into thinking "oh this is the sole cause and effect" but not potential alternative scenarios.

[–] HexesofVexes@lemmy.world 9 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Honestly, I always poke the stats no matter how good the journal. The best way to read any article is as a skeptic (the onus is on the writer to prove their point), and any small irregularity is something to be queried.

No matter how good the journal, it's only as good as the reviewers, and reviewers are humans too. Odds are a paper in nature is all above board, but I'm somewhat of a pedant when it comes to checking test conditions.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 3 hours ago

i do that to, i also try to find most recent research, anything older than 5+years is suspect, because they always come with revised papers in newer studies/research eventually.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RBWells@lemmy.world 10 points 9 hours ago

I do kinda think everyone should have to Freaky Friday swap with anyone they disdain or don't have empathy for, and also one random swap.

I've never been bothered by catcalling but haven't had it happen in a dangerous feeling situation.

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 63 points 13 hours ago

Turns out walking through a sketchy area and being harassed are scary no matter what genitalia you have.

[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 41 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

My guess is that the men who don't think they'd be bothered by cat-calling are imagining a scenario where there are lots of other people around and the risk of being physically attacked is very low. (Something like the stereotypical image of construction workers whistling at a woman walking by them on a busy sidewalk.) Being on a nearly-empty subway platform with the only other guy nearby accosting you is a genuinely risky situation even without pretending that you're a woman.

One time I was walking on the sidewalk when a car with several young women drove by and one of them leaned out the window and yelled something at me. I didn't hear what she said but I like to think that it was positive and it made my day, but the caveat is that I did not feel like I was in any physical danger at all from them.

[–] Wren@lemmy.today 8 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

You said it. I compared notes, once, with my partner at the time, who occasionally dressed a bit flamboyant. Being shouted at made him feel annoyed and sad, which sucks, but he thought that put him on the same level as me.

The difference was he could recall each time he was catcalled, and was surprised to hear it happened just about daily to me. Even more surprised to hear that sometimes when I didn't respond, guys have followed me and kept shouting. Sometimes in groups. Extremely surprised to hear that on a few occasions I've actually had to run from these groups.

Catcalling is easy to ignore, but considering I literally had to run from strangers, I still slide my keys between my knuckles and get ready to sprint whenever I hear it.

[–] binarytobis@lemmy.world 29 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

One time I was one of the very first people to play an MMO so my friends and I all grabbed up some really good names that are always taken before we start. I made six characters, two female, one of which I named “Beyonce” and put effort into making it look as much like her as possible.

On five of the characters people pretty much ignored me entirely, as usual. But when I played Beyonce people wanted to talk to me all the time. They would constantly invite me to stuff, give me things, name drop me in chat. Just kind of gather around me in town. Even other men who were playing female characters just assumed I was a woman.

I don’t know what it was about that character specifically, but it was a valuable insight into the life of women.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›