[-] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 58 points 10 hours ago

Obligatory XKCD

[-] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago

It'd be nice to have the certainty we'll still be around in 2271.

[-] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 9 points 19 hours ago

Make no mistake... those people are clowns too.

[-] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

Release date for the release date is about to drop.

[-] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Takes too much energy. Deport him out of the solar system and let him spout his nonsense to Voyager.

[-] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

No, the OSI model is fine.

I'm talking more about sandboxing an interpreted app that runs a container that runs another sandboxed interpreted app, both running their own instances of their interpreter with their own dependencies and accessible through a web interface that is accessible through yet another container running a web server that is running in Python with a virtual environment despite being the only Python app on the container, which is then connected to from another sandboxed tab on a sandboxed browser on your machine.

But hey, at least it isn't, god forbid, a MONOLITH. That would require someone to take the time to understand how the application works.

[-] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 60 points 2 days ago

Not that I think this isn't hilarious, but to quote Trump's own idiotic ramblings, "Nobody knows what an app is." His redneck supporters that don't trust such fancy lib'ral scams as "mail" and "locked drop boxes" sure aren't going to understand using an app to book a seat in a movie theater.

[-] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

Their UX and UI are their bread and butter, but as someone who has done extensive web app development for use on Safari browsers, if I had a nickel for every time their browser just IGNORED a standard, broke one that previously worked, or added new "features" that broke a standard, passing the responsibility of building a workaround down to individual developers... I'd have a few dollars anyway. I don't have much faith their code is all that good compared to average under the hood and the UI, and I think their reputation unjustly leads users to turn a blind eye or give them a pass when their stuff DOESN'T work or works BADLY. "They're Apple... everyone else seems happy. I must be doing something wrong."

[-] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

It doesn't help that every new generation adds a new blackbox abstraction layer with little to no end-user benefit, the possibility of duplicated functionality and poor implementation, security concerns, poor support, and requiring a flashy new CPU with system crashing speed tricks to maintain a responsive environment through 12 levels of interpreters.

[-] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Yes! Containerize, containerize, containerize until every perfectly good machine built before 2020 is rotting away in a landfill!

202

This is a job for Kristi Noem.

474

Seriously. Just stop it already.

28

Am I out of touch?

727
submitted 3 weeks ago by mycodesucks@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.ml

Looking at YOU, Williams Street/Warner Bros.

68

I will never trust again.

296
STOP THAT! (lemmy.world)

Waaaaaaaaah

140
submitted 1 month ago by mycodesucks@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.ml

Specifically thinking about The Little Match Girl and To Build a Fire

306

Why is Worf in Engineering anyway?

93

It's called "CoinciDental"

270
⬇️ push (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 months ago by mycodesucks@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.ml

Why would you assume I agree with something just because I said it?

457

Smugly satisfied pundit face

4
submitted 2 months ago by mycodesucks@lemmy.world to c/zelda@lemmy.ml

Sorry... the cold must be getting to me.

view more: next ›

mycodesucks

joined 6 months ago