this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2025
705 points (89.6% liked)

memes

18415 readers
2945 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 days ago

If it's only morons that use it "wrong", then it does indeed become right, but still gains the added subtext of "by the way I'm also a moron"

[–] Bosht@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

My pet peeve is 'loose' being used when 'lose' is intended. It's so common now it might as well be the new spelling but I will die on this hill. I've had people comment in response to me correcting someone like I'm being ridiculous. Feels like I'm taking crazy pills!

[–] Snowpix@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

I seen that all the time.

[–] moderatecentrist@feddit.uk 15 points 2 days ago (4 children)

So I should accept people saying "could care less" when they mean the exact opposite? Not sure I can do that.

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Idioms don't have to (and often don't) make sense. How do you feel about "head over heels"?

[–] moderatecentrist@feddit.uk 5 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Interesting - Wiktionary says that the phrase was originally "heels over head", which makes sense when conveying the sense of tumbling over. I guess that became corrupted, resulting in "head over heels". Maybe I should start saying "heels over head" then.

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 4 points 2 days ago

Consider the distinction between accurate and efficient. If your way of speaking becomes technically correct by some standard, but inefficient for the purpose of communication, is that really a desirable outcome? Does it have to be perfect, or just good enough to convey thoughts?

[–] chrizzly@feddit.org 3 points 2 days ago

Now reading it, I never directly realized it being this (wrong) way in the english language. In German the equivalent term would be "Hals über Kopf" (Neck over head) which made sense for a feeling of the world being upside down. Funny that in English it is actually the "normal" worldview - at least how the modern expression goes.

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago

I mean, the main point is that language doesn't have to make "logical" sense. It's not a math problem. Just look at all the inconsistencies in pretty much every aspect of a language. It's all there simply because of history and people agreeing on meanings for words and phrases. For example, you've got something like prepositions. There's literally zero logical reason why we talk or speak to someone, but we don't tell or converse to someone.

And people who are more rigid in thinking about language always seem to think the language they learned growing up is the most "correct" version, whether that has a basis in history or not. Like even though literally has been used as an intensifier for (literally) hundreds of years, that seems to be a sticking point, whereas something like very, which has a similar root (veracis meaning truth), any sentence using very doesn't have to have an exact truthful meaning.

Hell, once we go back to "original" meanings of words, where do we stop? The singular use of "they" is older than that of singular "you", but I somehow never see the "singular they is confusing" crowd advocating for a return to thee/thou.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago

Irregardless, you can still make fun of people for anything. Remember the US president and that disabled guy?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] fadhl3y@feddit.uk 5 points 2 days ago

I think we should bring back philosohoraptor - Morpheus seems wrong for this meme

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 25 points 2 days ago

And I'm still gonna bitch about it if they've reduced the usefulness of a word due to habitual misuse!

[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 29 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Well. Sort of.

Some terminology is better defined by how the relevant experts use it. It's singular and precise definition is required for any useful dialogue. If 99% of people call a kidney a liver but doctors call it a kidney its a kidney.

Some terminology evolves and is used differently by different groups. Sometimes the more illiterate group flattens the language by removing nuance or even entirely removing a concept from a language with no replacement. Arguably both definitions may be common usage but one is worse and using it means you are.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Some word usage just becomes so common everyone, even generational gaps understand it. If you talk to an 18 or a 65 year old and say the word blowjob, they both know what you mean, yet they aren't out there blowing on dicks or trying to force air up urethras... Hopefully...

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

classic case of the four-leaved-clover story

edit:

[–] Sunsofold@lemmings.world 2 points 1 day ago

What if they all use it 'wrong' but all use it differently?

[–] Rachelhazideas@lemmy.world 21 points 3 days ago (8 children)

For all intensive purposes, the meaning of words matters less than how we use it. Irregardless of how we decimate it's meaning, so long as we get the point across there is no need to nip it in the butt. Most people could care less.

[–] 2xar@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

I hate you.

I will hunt you for sport.

[–] Geldaran@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago

::glares:: Well done. 😆

[–] RamSwamson@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 2 days ago

I'm filled with unreasonable blind rage now. Thank you.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] m3t00@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago (2 children)
[–] hakunawazo@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't see the backside of Morpheus' head.
Should look like that:

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Grabthar@lemmy.world 28 points 3 days ago (3 children)

But do you mean literally everyone or literally everyone?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 86 points 3 days ago (18 children)

Ok ok... I'll be the one...

"Wrongly"

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] PabloSexcrowbar@piefed.social 73 points 3 days ago (20 children)

I'm gonna get the shit downvoted out of me for this, but the problem with this idea is that insular communities tend to redefine words and then expect everyone outside their bubble to know their new definition. Doing so also robs the language of a word that served a specific purpose, such as in the case of the word "literally."

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] VinesNFluff@pawb.social 3 points 2 days ago

Prescriptivists should be shoved into all the lockers in the world.

[–] Geth@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 3 days ago (5 children)

I've allready to rite we'll, but than my conscious sad, “For get the rules,” so I let my lose ideals led me. I’m two stubborn to accept that I should of staid in school.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] qualia@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Descriptive ~~language~~ grammar >> prescriptive ~~language~~ grammar

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ummthatguy@lemmy.world 48 points 3 days ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] wowwoweowza@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

What if I told you that if everyone uses a word the “wrong” way, in slightly different ways, it’s wrong?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago (2 children)

"Everyone" meaning the social media someone and their social set get their info and cues from, not the rest of the people around them.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Bluewing@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Languages are living things. And living things always change. Note the Great English Vowel Change. Even the Norwegian my Grandfather spoke and that I learned from him was virtually a dead language that modern Norwegians stopped using in the 1850s. And the English spoken in the UK is different than the American English I speak. Spanish spoken in Spain isn't the same as someone from Mexico speaks.

And when conversing with someone, (in the language of your choice), the words you choose to use are defined by the context you use them in. Words can have multiple meanings, but it's the context and tone clarifies those meanings. Consider all the meanings of the single word 'fuck'.

But problems start with written words. And many people have poor written communication skills. It can be hard to parse meaning from poorly written words because there is little context and tone that comes through with a typed sentence.

We are all just baying at the moon like any pack. And hoping some understands us.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Buffy@libretechni.ca 34 points 3 days ago (9 children)

This is real and actually quite interesting to look at the history of. For example, the word "Decimate" IIRC was originally defined as killing one for every ten people of a group of people. Now, its used as a term for high impact destruction.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Alwaysnownevernotme@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago (7 children)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 days ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] uncouple9831@lemmy.zip 12 points 3 days ago (12 children)

What if I told you memes were supposed to be funny rather than excusing ignorance?

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago (6 children)

ok here’s three examples of exactly what the meme is referring to:

  • “Awful” originally meant “awe-inspiring” or “full of awe,” but frequent use to mean “very bad” eventually became the standard modern meaning.

  • “Peruse” traditionally meant “to read carefully,” but common casual use to mean “to skim or browse” has become widespread enough that dictionaries now record both senses.

  • “Nimrod” started as the name of a skilled biblical hunter, but repeated ironic use as an insult (for example, in cartoons... “Bugs Bunny”) led to its accepted modern sense of “fool” or “idiot.”

Language changes. Words mean what we say they mean since its all made up anyway.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 25 points 3 days ago (46 children)

My two are Literally, and Crescendo. I really hate it when they are used wrong, and now the wrong answers are considered acceptable. That means Literally actually holds no meaning at all, and by changing the definition of Crescendo, the last 500 years of Western Music Theory have been changed by people who have no understanding of music at all.

load more comments (46 replies)
[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago (14 children)

Honestly, I could care less about this shit.

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›