this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2025
967 points (97.4% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

35568 readers
4219 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Johandea@feddit.nu 67 points 4 days ago (7 children)

No one who's actually used Grindr likes that app. It sucks, and not in a good way. It fills its niche, but it is a horrible app and gets worse and worse with every update.

Rant over.

[–] Darkmuch@lemmy.world 55 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Oh so it’s like all other dating apps.

[–] ArsonButCute@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I read recently they're all tuned to give you almost perfect matches with people you'll vibe with for a few dates then end up back on the app

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I read the same. We need a FOSS dating app without these stupid semi-matching algorithms.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 43 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The fediverse chick never messaged you?

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 30 points 4 days ago

She did, but I had my concerns. I'm down with poly relationships, but I don't think I could date someone who is seeing that many other people.

[–] anzo@programming.dev 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

https://alovoa.com/ has an app on f-droid, they probably need the users, hehe!

Percent of Alovoa PC users on Linux: 93%

[–] huppakee@piefed.social 6 points 4 days ago

There is no matching algorithm in Grindr though, it's just 'people near you'.

And this has always been the obvious logical conclusion for a for profit dating app

And also similarly applies to other for profit software. It's the whole idea behind enshittification

Which is why FOSS is king and should be supported as much as possible in as many areas as possible

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 7 points 4 days ago

Isn't that just... every app?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] kate@lemmy.uhhoh.com 67 points 4 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] edinbruh@feddit.it 34 points 4 days ago (6 children)

If Turing was alive he would say that LLMs are wasting computing power to do something a human should be able to do on their own, and thus we shouldn't waste time studying them.

Which is what he said about compilers and high level languages (in this instance, high level means like Fortran, not like python)

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Humans are able to do it but it takes us weeks instead of seconds.

Many, many tasks that would have taken hours or days to learn are just instant now. I dont know why people dont appreciate that technology. Is it because its sometimes wrong? Even with the time spent fixing errors, its many many times faster than doing the task manually.

Maybe the difference in opinions is because people talk about very different tasks and the llm just sucks at some of them, while being excellent at others.

[–] edinbruh@feddit.it 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I don't like it because people don't shut up about it and insist everyone should use it when it's clearly stupid.

LLMs are language models, they don't actually reason (not even reasoning models), when they nail a reasoning it's by chance, not by design. Everything that is not language processing shouldn't be done by an LLM. Viceversa, they are pretty good with language.

We already had automated reasoning tools. They are used for industrial optimization (i.e. finding optimal routes, finding how to allocate production, etc.) and no one cared about those.

As if it wasn't enough. The internet is now full of slop. And hardware companies are warmongering an arms race that is fueling an economic bubble. And people are being fired to be replaced by something that will not actually work in the long run because it does not reason.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UnrepentantAlgebra@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Where did he say that about compilers and high level languages? He died before Fortran was released and probably programmed on punch cards or tape.

[–] edinbruh@feddit.it 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I'll try to find it later, I read he said that in a book from Martin Davis. He didn't speak about Fortran, I just used it as an analogy

[–] UnrepentantAlgebra@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Fair, I'm mostly just curious what high level languages were around at the time given how early this was in the history of programming. A quick search did not turn up helpful results.

[–] edinbruh@feddit.it 1 points 2 days ago

Oh, it probably wasn't about an existing language, but about some guy studying what would become high level languages. Like studying linkers and symbolic representation of programs

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] blave@lemmy.world 41 points 4 days ago (1 children)

When people ask me what the difference between Reddit and Lemmy is, I can just show them this post

[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

Horny gamers vs gay horny programmers.

[–] hefty4871@lemmy.ca 26 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I wish Alan Turing was still alive and using Grindr. It would probably motivate him to update his test just to wade through the 80% of bot profiles on the app!

He would be 113. He wouldnt have time or the energy for anyone's shit after 1980ish.

[–] python@lemmy.world 21 points 4 days ago (5 children)

Honestly I'd much rather hear Isaac Asimov's opinion on the current state of AI. Passing the Turing Test is whatever, but how far away are LLMs from conforming to the 3 laws of Robotics?

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 4 days ago

The laws are not profitable, so why would they implement them? /s

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

but how far away are LLMs from conforming to the 3 laws of Robotics?

We seem to be moving away from those, not closer.

[–] bus_factor@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Does following the 3 laws of robotics increase profits? Does ignoring them increase profits? Are tech bros empty husks without a shred of shame or empathy? Is this too many rhetorical questions in a row?

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 4 points 3 days ago

Does following the 3 laws of robotics increase profits?

Depends on the product. A maid bot? Yes. An automated turret? No.

Does ignoring them increase profits?

See previous answer, and reverse it.

Are tech bros empty husks without a shred of shame or empathy?

Yes.

Is this too many rhetorical questions in a row?

Perhaps.

[–] Dragonstaff@leminal.space 9 points 3 days ago (2 children)

There's no question. Chatbots are implicated in a lot of suicides, shattering the first rule.

There could be an interesting conversation about whether the environmental impact ALSO breaks the first rule, but that conversation is unnecessary when chat bots are telling kids to kill themselves.

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 days ago

yes it remains to be seen if chatbots are ever capable of obeying any of the laws.

It doesn't and cant obey all orders, it doesn't and can't protect humans, it doesn't and can't protect its own existence and it doesn't or can't prevent humanity from coming to harm.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 23 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Ok, but would he think the AI bots on grindr pass the Turing test?

[–] Hupf@feddit.org 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

lol. It was right there.

[–] highrfrequenc@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

Start the timer to the ai generated post on reddit asking to explain the joke

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago

Excited to hear New Labour's position on chemically castrating one of the greatest scientists in history. Perhaps we can get some Guardian Op-Eds explaining why it is both necessary and good to drive the nation's finest minds to suicide with constant verbal and physical abuse.

[–] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 3 points 3 days ago
[–] TypFaffke@feddit.org 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Grindr is a non-deterministic Turing machine that might get you laid in linear time.

load more comments (1 replies)

Fuck the Britains who destroyed his life!

load more comments
view more: next ›