khepri

joined 3 years ago
[–] khepri@lemmy.world 1 points 20 minutes ago* (last edited 18 minutes ago)

So are we just kind of admitting that there exists no way to expose any networked device to the internet securely? Because if it's not possible for PLCs I don't see why it would be possible for any device. If water utilities have to take these offline, then how does that advice not apply for every control device in every facility worldwide?

[–] khepri@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

And their premier vehicle, the CyberStuck

[–] khepri@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

With a name like that you could say they were screwed from the start.

There could be a whole thread just on the variation's of that concept, but the most obvious for a gas station has to be "Pump and Dump"

[–] khepri@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Yeah man, who do you think all these execs and consultants in charge of these build outs are asking haha. "Hey ChatGPT, should we make more ChatGPT?" "Yeah buddy make all the ChatGTPs that's a great idea, would you like me to massage your ego and greed centers next?"

 

I'm thinking things like "Same-sung" For Samsung, because all their products look kinda generic and boring, or Ford standing for "Fix Or Repair Daily" because of the engineering and build quality, or "McDiabetes", for obvious reasons.

[–] khepri@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I suppose a state can sign it's rights away in a contract just like any other entity, but I'd love to know if one EVER HAS. Because I don't think that's up to GEO and ICE to determine between the two of them which laws they are obligated to follow or not. At first I assumed that ICE had gotten some actual US State to agree to this, which would be horrible but at least would make more sense than a private fucking company and a federal agency unilaterally declaring they won't follow the laws of the state they are operating in, which is what this appear to be.

[–] khepri@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I know chip and RAM fabs are incredibly difficult and expensive to build, but how is the several trillion $ out there just up for grabs for anyone that can undercut the like 4 companies that have one not enough to get us someone to say "I don't care what it costs, I don't care what you have to do, because even if I pay 50x what it costs nvidia to make a fab, I will still be scrooging like a villain"?

[–] khepri@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Yay I can hardly wait for hordes of these things owned by governments and corporations to be armed and active in around the globe!

[–] khepri@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

Oh that is just standard copy straight out of the union-busting playbook. In law you would call it "preserving the objection" which basically means they know it's BS but at least if they don't back down from it they can burn more time and money because now the process has to accommodate for all this "pressure" "confusion" and "misunderstanding" that po' 'ol liddle Wikimedia just can't make sense of.

[–] khepri@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

If whoever is writing the lower thirds for FOX had ever been to a library themselves, they might know that the comma there is totally incorrect...

[–] khepri@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago

Imagine being the first person to realize that the Empire is dead and you can just fucking climb up there with your buddies and take that gold cap lol.

[–] khepri@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

Not by me they aren't don't tell me what to do

[–] khepri@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

he wouldn't have been an American-style MAGA conservative, that's for sure. "Let thy government abduct thy neighbors because they don't have paperwork" is hard to imagine him saying...

 

Let's get mad like the gif days.

view more: next ›