[-] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 days ago

Or, a culture that values respect over individualism. To each their own, but to me willingly eating food wrong to belittle a culture isn't "fun", it's just stupid and rude.

[-] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

None of this is mandatory, the sign says so. They're social norms, not legal rules. It's just saying "this is how this food is consumed in its original country, and breaking these norms may result in inadvertently offending someone or embarrassing yourself", which might be something you'd like to know if you plan to travel to that country, or simply to try experiencing it in the traditional way - after all, most social norms have a hidden logical reason. Many of these exist simply to avoid making a mess.

You're free to eat however you want, however some cultures do place a lot of significance on food and how it is consumed. People in Italy will lose some respect for you if you try to order a Hawaii pizza, put ketchup on pasta, or use a knife improperly. The same goes for Japan and many other places. You'll still be served and probably treated with superficial kindness, it just depends on how much weight you put on your experience vs that of others.

[-] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 4 days ago

So spending money gives you the right to disrespect cultures? Interesting

[-] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 days ago

Or is philosophy a science? (Of conscience/the mind)

[-] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Sure the AI can break it down for the humans

Depends on who built the model, and the selection of the data used to train it. AI holds a lot of potential in my book, if you use it right. But never stop being critical of the answers you receive, and be aware of they work and their shortcomings

[-] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 weeks ago

Maybe they could never see the actual pharaoh, but what I'm saying is that "The Pharaoh" was itself the "face" of power, and also where power and influence actually resided. Now we have surveillance and propaganda perpetuated by either known but opaque actors (e.g. governmental agencies, corporations) or simply unknown ones. You can believe or not in an international "elite" conspiracy, but by that I also mean random teen hacker groups, data brokers, gov agencies of nations other than the one you live in, etc.

[-] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 2 weeks ago

History does not only repeat, and simply looking at the past can make you blind to the novel ways society has transformed. For example, oppression has been a constant throughout history, but it never has been as faceless as it is today. Lords and kings have been replaced by corporations and agencies operating across borders, in ways and with purposes that I don't think anyone who's not actually involved with can claim they fully understand.

[-] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 weeks ago

That's been a thing for a while. Bluetooth ones work too

[-] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 weeks ago

You do realize that you are not answering in good faith, nor providing anything to this thread with this comment? You're being one of the people you're complaining about ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

[-] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 weeks ago

HTTP/3 is yet another thing, unrelated to both of them. Wikipedia has a disambiguation page for the two meanings: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_3.0 https://www.cnbc.com/2022/11/04/web-inventor-tim-berners-lee-wants-us-to-ignore-web3.html

[-] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, I'm with you. web3 is the cryptobro blockchain web, while Web 3.0 usually refers to either RFC-based standards or "the state of the modern web" - the post 2.0 era

[-] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)
view more: next ›

floquant

joined 4 weeks ago