this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2025
673 points (99.4% liked)

politics

26489 readers
1704 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Many of the MAGA influencers outed as living in countries like Nigeria and Bangladesh have since vanished from X.

The users, who had over a million followers between them, had their country of origin exposed over the weekend as part of a new X feature that now shows where accounts were created and how their owners downloaded the social platform’s app.

Four prominent accounts unmasked by the feature—DarkMAGA, MagaScope, WilliamAlbrech, and IvankaNews_—now show as being “suspended” for violating “X rules,” though it is unclear which. X’s website says it bars users who pretend to be someone they are not—something all the accounts appear to be guilty of.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 111 points 3 days ago (1 children)

to later reappear with different username

[–] jdredbeard@lemmy.world 23 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (2 children)

your 9 days old account makes me think you're probably familiar with the technique

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] 2piradians@lemmy.world 125 points 3 days ago (6 children)

Maybe try not being followers who allow ourselves to be influenced. I think if you had described this social media situation to average people 20 years ago most would have seen it as dystopian, evil even. But because it happened so gradually it gained acceptance.

I guess what I'm saying is we should get the hell rid of it all so eventually public opinion won't be swayed by cheap foreign labor, bots, and people who just want to burn it all down.

But we won't because too many think all this is better than the world before it existed.

/rant

[–] IcedRaktajino@startrek.website 47 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

I guess what I'm saying is we should get the hell rid of it all so eventually public opinion won't be swayed by cheap foreign labor, bots, and people who just want to burn it all down.

I've blocked so many accounts on here that are clearly not Americans just straight up trying to incite shit in US news / politics communities. I don't know what's worse: the number of upvotes those get or how transparent they are.

[–] Augustiner@lemmy.world 32 points 3 days ago

Always feel conflicted blocking guys like this… I wanna keep seeing them so I can downvote, but they also are just fucking annoying and toxic.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Horsecook@sh.itjust.works 17 points 3 days ago

If only we could go back to the halcyon days of twenty years ago, when people were not influenced by talkshow hosts, athletes hawking household goods, and tabloids breathlessly reporting on actors and socialites.

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That requires a population that is educated and can critically read and analyze media. Don't think any country in the world has that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 days ago

I mean… 20 years ago when we only had Xanga, MySpace, Friendster, LiveJournal, LinkedIn, and many others. Even Facebook is 21 years old now… though it didn’t become available for everyone for a couple years after that.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca 21 points 3 days ago

They are probably already back with new names. Or the rest of their names.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 34 points 3 days ago (4 children)

I was wondering if this is just because of VPN use or something but nope this confirms they’re actually just hired trolls and the rubes have been manipulated this whole time. Fucking pathetic how dumb we are.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Well, lots of tankies, "centrists", and of course nearly all Republicans seem to think that concerns about Russia going back to 2016's election are a "hoax".

I don't know if they could even begin to articulate what they think that word means in the context of their claims. But they sure are butthurt about it.

[–] khepri@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago

It wasn't just based on IP from what I understand, but also what country's app store you used.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I could be wrong here, but unless you're actively trying to hide something pretty serious, I'd be surprised if people use a VPN and set it to a country like Nigeria or Bangladesh if you're from NA.

Maybe Canada if you're from the USA, likely other states, or maybe somewhere in the EU if you think their data protection laws will be better for you.

But Nigeria? Who fuck sets their VPN there?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 days ago (2 children)

The hired trolls are only one part of the problem. The other problem -- perhaps the bigger problem -- is that running scam / spam accounts is a legitimate occupation for people living in near-poverty. They need to put food on the table, and if they can do so by posting MAGA bullshit to get the advertising clicks, of course they'll keep on doing that.

This is a good example of why everyone should be working to improve the living situations of everyone else in the world, and not just in their own country. It's not like most people enjoy running scams, but if that pays the bills, fuck it, let the rich Americans sort it out.

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

There are literal companies you can hire. They also do it to cancel people or promote beliefs about people.

A good example is that Johnny Depp admitted he hired one against his ex during the public court stuff to make her look bad. Amber Heard. And it worked.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/articles/3VnNDMYzttcGgBNQB0BswtH/amber-heard-vs-the-internet-an-organised-smear-campaign

Companies, in this case, owned by Saudi

This stuff sounds like crackpot conspiracy theories. But it's real. This stuff is reality now.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 days ago

That last paragraph was something that struck me...I was thinking about this earlier in the day.

The great thing about disadvantaged groups is that they are easy to exploit.

This isn't cheating. This is playing the game strictly by the rules. The whole system of checks and balances assumed good faith and professional conduct. That turned out to be a really shitty assumption.

[–] FenderStratocaster@lemmy.world 42 points 3 days ago (3 children)
[–] AreaKode@lemmy.world 37 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] kautau@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This mass user exodus sponsored by ExpressVPN™

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 days ago

Probably already are

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago

Did these X admins not realize the fallout or was there some other intended purpose?

I can smell the outrage from here.

[–] demizerone@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Twitter should be nationalized in the public interest and made the online public square like the national mall. Fully transparent and accountable.

[–] blubfisch@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Sounds cool, until the fascists take over the government...

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 12 points 3 days ago

As opposed to the non fascists in corporations?

[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 3 days ago

they already have

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

To hear fElon tell it, that's what he thought Twitter was before, and what he aimed for Xitter to uphold...

LOL. Sorry, hard to type that w/o laughing.

[–] hackitfast@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I think you mean, X should be nationalized like our social security numbers have been. It's only fair, the piece of shit who runs it is the only reason that even happened, why not keep things fair?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago

I wonder. People saying it isn't VPNs aren't necessarily wrong but I do want to say it's likely they are using bot networks to mass create accounts and those might use IP rotation. Those IPs can come from any fucking place. I've only seen it from scraping operations, but I bet it's necessary when mass operating bullshit accounts.

US proxies exist, but they're more expensive and wouldn't make as much sense for mass creating if your goal is just to avoid getting blocked.

[–] MourningDove@lemmy.zip 10 points 3 days ago

Some gifts wrap themselves….

[–] Routhinator@startrek.website 23 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Musk pretends he's something he's not on Shitter all the time.

[–] crandlecan@mander.xyz 10 points 3 days ago

A compassionate genius?

[–] TomMasz@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I'm not sure I can believe that Elon thought this wouldn't have a downside. He had to know so many right-wing chud accounts weren't US based.

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net 20 points 3 days ago

Idk he has kinda proven himself to be an incompetent nazi on many different occasions

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Maybe he just weighed the ups/downs for the moment. He didn't have the bot farms up trying to convince people to vote for Trump and sway public opinion anymore maybe. Maybe he made the call that exposing accounts and introducing the idea he can expose them a threat to any political upstarts wanting to take the next monarchy grasp. He can expose the accounts he wants, while spending less money having to combat any political opposition that may want to run similar campaign tactics that they used.

There are members who wanted to go further into "America first" bologna, maybe he realized that won't be beneficial for him long term finally

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

I wonder if this will actually affect some upcoming election outcomes.

And now I think every other major commercial platform in use in the United States should do the same...

[–] crandlecan@mander.xyz 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So... I can't use an alias on Shitter?

[–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

Needs to be Shitter, LLC based in USSR.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

I heard it was because they used VPNs! (/s if needed)

load more comments
view more: next ›