So the 14 year old can consent to sex but can't he trusted to make good decisions with the resulting 10 million dollars until she's almost finished her bachelor's? What internal logic is this whole thing operating on?
this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2023
172 points (100.0% liked)
the_dunk_tank
15911 readers
7 users here now
It's the dunk tank.
This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml
Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
it's the reactor core of libertarianism: property is more important than people
Hands off the trust fund! It can’t consent until it has matured!
What internal logic is this whole thing operating on?
You start at "I want to bang 14 year olds" and work backwards from there
honestly presenting ethical questions under capitalism in this way makes it abundantly clear why the marketplace is the enemy of humanity. if there is someone who has the means and intent to do something like this, the only acceptable answer is to kill them and redistribute their wealth. nothing else comes even remotely close to solving the problem.
Furniture and Meat
The adventure time episode that makes libertarians into communists
Let's say a billionaire wants to watch 456 poor people from Korea compete in winner-takes-all blood sports until only one participant is left, that winner receives ₩26.9B. All participants agree. Should this be allowed?
As long as the media reports on it by saying "this is literally what they do in the north" while it happens exclusively in the south.
Westoids do westoid shit in the west, westoidly: what are we, a bunch of asiatic chicoms???
Yeah this guy is a pedo for sure
People who should be legally incapable of giving sexual consent:
- Minors.
- Prisoners viz their guards.
- Anyone considering sleeping with a libertarian.
I AM FUCKING CACKLING
The last one is really more of a catch-all, since most libertarians seem to only be attracted to the first category.
https://twitter.com/RichardHanania/status/1720992936052306000
Link because I'm not a lib
He's president of this bullshit libertarian antiwoke think tank https://www.cspicenter.com/about
He is connected to university of Texas and his fellow think tankers are employed at university of London and Cornell among others. This seems like a slam dunk to flag a bunch of people in these august institutions and ruin this asshole's day 
Here is the staff page for where Rick is a fellow https://salemcenter.org/our-people/
lets say
no no no nooooooooooooooooooo
The joys of these bozos inventing hypothetical scenarios that are extremely rare or outright don't happen
"I'll set you up for life if you just let me have sex with you" is coercion no matter the age. You can't consent to that, not when "no" isn't really an option.
IT'S A LITERAL CHILD YOU DERANGED FUCK AAAAAAAAAHHHH
"Unrelated story, I have ten million dollars and a lawyer on retainer"
Typical libertarian poll
Do you:
A. Be a pedophile
B. Be a pedophile
C. Be a pedophile
D. Be a pedophile
Too real
Libertarians trying to figure out how they can fuck kids like 
I've read about this happening in Philippines except its in hundreds or at best thousands of dollars and the girl's "consent" is never involved. Only parents.
Wretched of the Earth excerpt
In its decadent aspect the national bourgeoisie gets considerable help from the Western bourgeoisies who happen to be tourists enamored of exoticism, hunting and casinos. The national bourgeoisie establishes holiday resorts and playgrounds for entertaining the Western bourgeoisie. This sector goes by the name of tourism and becomes a national industry for this very purpose. We only have to look at what has happened in Latin America if we want proof of the way the ex-colonized bourgeoisie can be transformed into "party" organizer. The casinos in Havana and Mexico City, the beaches of Rio, Copacabana, and Acapulco, the young Brazilian and Mexican girls, the thirteen-year-old mestizas, are the scars of this depravation of the national bourgeoisie. Because it is lacking in ideas, because it is inward-looking, cut off from the people, sapped by its congenital incapacity to evaluate issues on the basis of the nation as a whole, the national bourgeoisie assumes the role of manager for the companies of the West and turns its country virtually into a bordello for Europe.
Once again we need only to look at the pitiful spectacle of certain republics in Latin America. U.S. businessmen, banking magnates and technocrats jet "down to the tropics," and for a week to ten days wallow in the sweet depravity of their private "reserves."
empire didn't end it was just worked out to be cheaper to outsource colonial oppression to locals
well anyone willing to pimp their children for millions is probably desperate enough they'll go lower. That's just the free market
this logic is why the market is evil
Should this be allowed
That a known pedophile should have been given free reign to keep sex trafficking and in fact be given so much power and wealth that he could even theoretically have done this? Yeah it's kinda fucked up that we let it happen.
"Okay so I invented this awesome gotcha that's totally gonna own the libs. It's like the trolley problem, right? But one of the tracks makes you a Professional Pedophile and the other one is just a trolley track with no issues. This is gonna get em"
I love that trolley problem where there's no one on the track and you are just asking if I would derail public transportation for no reason. It's so easy to answer!
libertarians are breaking new ground in advanced pedophile theory
Hmmm. This is a tough one.
I'm gonna go with..... ~~kill Epstein again!~~ I mean: "No, male." Final answer.
Very normal thought experiment to think up.
Why? Why would you ask this? Sick fuck
This is the type of guy that goes by Richard but everybody calls him Dick
Not only should this not be allowed, Epstein should be tortured to death and also everyone who answered yes to this poll. Hypothetically, of course.
I was honestly a bit surprised Epstein didn't get more defenders from the AnCap crowd, but it seems most of them have gone Q-pilled. I guess Epstein being a Jewish metropolitan rich guy didn't help, now if he had been some steak eating Texas oil baron...
The tactic pedos seem to be using is to virtue signal extremely hard against Liberal pedophiles as cover. The ones just openly admitting support for pedophilia are the dumb ones who aren’t hip to the program
"To what?" Is the all-enlightening preposition.
You've probably heard "States rights to what?"
Now the libertarian version:
"Freedom to what?"
Vietnam deciding whether to let Americans into the country after the war be like
I think we need to start making excuses for the lack of terror.
Oh I didnt see this lol. Oh well. Mine has a cw! And we should never stop posting.
view more: next ›