this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2025
478 points (99.0% liked)

Science Memes

16919 readers
2925 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mushroommunk@lemmy.today 110 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Eh, the odds of actually colliding with anything is low enough. Plus the night sky would probably be even more breathtaking. I'm in

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 39 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I think there's maybe more risk with the solar system being thrown off balance with other gravitational forces pulling things out of orbit. Even if earth just gets pulled away from the sun a little we are screwed. Or even the moon pulled away from earth somewhat.

[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Even if earth just gets pulled away from the sun a little we are screwed.

I get what you're saying, but had to laugh at the use of "a little" here. The goldilocks zone in the solar system is roughly the between the orbits of Venus and Mars, and we're almost right in the middle of it, so "a little" is like 150 million km.

I would imagine that the first issue we would experience would be that the moon would be pulled out of Earth's orbit first and then we lose the ocean tides and the stable tilt of the earth. It would probably get worse from there.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 28 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Goldilocks zone is basically just where life can survive.

Even if we stay within the Goldilocks zone doesn't mean that most of the species alive today won't go extinct because it fucks up the seasons or the magnetic poles or tilt of the earth, etc.

[–] DrWorm@piefed.social 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Maybe we’ll get lucky and it’ll counter global warming

[–] swab148@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 week ago

Just keep scooting away a little every year, problem solved

[–] dalekcaan@feddit.nl 6 points 1 week ago

"Thank god global warming never happened."

"Actually, it did, but thank god for nuclear winter."

[–] Tuuktuuk@piefed.ee 9 points 1 week ago

Could the other galaxy please pull us just the correct distance away from the sun to cancel the effect of global warming?

[–] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 5 points 1 week ago

Given the vastness of space, this is a lot less likely than you might think, and the process itself would likely take millenia anyway.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago

It's even safer. The odds that it's coming directly at us to "collide" is low. Moving towards us doesn't mean it's moving directly at us. If you're driving down the road, all cars going in the other direction get doppler shifted. They're coming towards you, they pass beside you (hopefully), and then they're moving away from you.

[–] AntiOutsideAktion@hexbear.net 4 points 1 week ago

and lose the character of the spiral arm configuration? For what? A blob??

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 48 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Milky Way is going to collide with Andromeda… over the course of millions of years, and due to the distance between stars and other objects the two galaxies are just going to merge with each other and very few things will actually make physical contact.

[–] zakobjoa@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Well, if they collide (and merge), they'll also fling a lot of stars into the void, but we aren't too sure anymore that's actually gonna happen. NASA explains why (YT, 2:30min).

[–] Genius@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 week ago

Thank you very much for posting the video length. I wasn't gonna watch a 10 minute video but 2 was short enough.

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Nobody liked those stars anyway…

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 42 points 1 week ago (4 children)

So blue is moving toward you?

I was always a bit confused with the explanations in high school. But I also got a D in physics so maybe I'm just dumb.

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 49 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Blue shift, it's moving towards you, the photons are being "compressed" to a higher, bluer frequency. Redshift, the light is being "stretched" to a lower, redder frequency. Both only noticeable at significant fractions of the spped of light, relativistic speed.

Something ominous about the post is that a cosmic object that is moving towards you at a steady rate is consided "blueshifted" in the past tense, it's velocity is steady. If a galaxy is "Blueshifting" in the present tense, then that galzy is somehow accelerating at you, which is impossible unless it's under direct control by an entity, presumably a kardeshev level 3 civilization.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Isn't the rate of expansion in the universe increasing, and at an uneven rate at that? Meaning it could just as easily be an as of yet unknown natural phenomenon?

[–] deltapi@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The expansion is supposed to be happening everywhere at the same time, not just at the edges.
For example, tomorrow there should be more space between the Sol and Alpha Centauri systems than there was yesterday.
Our present understanding suggests that 'normal' universal expansion should not (in and of itself) result in anything moving towards us.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 8 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Aren't the milky way and andromeda on a collision course with each other?

[–] Zink@programming.dev 11 points 1 week ago

Yep. Space is expanding everywhere at once, but the effect is minuscule at the scales we're used to. And even at galactic scales the "speed" of expansion might seem like a lot to us, but it still isn't enough to overcome the motion of objects. I looked up some rough numbers to give you an idea:

The rate of expansion of space is 73 km/s/Mpc. So for every 3.26 million light-years between you and a distant galaxy, the space between you and that galaxy is expanding by 73 kilometers per second.

Andromeda's blue shift indicates it's headed towards us at 110 km/s. And in my non-expert head I'm thinking that blueshifted light must have already been redshifted by the millions of years traveling through space to reach us. So the galaxy's speed through space towards us when the light was emitted was considerably higher.

Andromeda is 2.5 Million light-years away, btw. So the cumulative distance of space between here and there is expanding at something like 73 km/s/Mpc * 2.5 Mly * 1Mpc/3.26Mly = 57 km/s.

But when talking about relativistic distances and speeds, basic terms regarding time and location don't always make sense.

[–] psud@aussie.zone 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Milky way and Andromeda are close enough that expansion is too small to overpower gravity

Our local group is racing toward The Great Attractor but will never reach it as expansion is pulling it away faster than we're falling toward it

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Davel23@fedia.io 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

For example, tomorrow there should be more space between the Sol and Alpha Centauri systems than there was yesterday.

Galaxies are gravitationally bound, they do not expand in the same way as the universe.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)

Yes which would be very odd for a far away object

[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No, it's just depressed and that makes us feel sad and worried for it.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 6 points 1 week ago

I'm blue shifting-daba-dee-di

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub 42 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh no! We might not survive the collision to hundred fifty thousand years from now!

[–] Davel23@fedia.io 84 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If it's billions of light years away it might be just a little longer than that.

[–] Zwiebel@feddit.org 19 points 1 week ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz 24 points 1 week ago (3 children)

If it's blue shifting from that distance, then it's likely some advanced technology is moving it in our direction.

There's not many other explanations for that.

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Could it potentially be an object orbiting around the cosmic center that just so happens to have an orbital path that crosses us?

I have to admit that astronomy is what caused me to change majors, but that's because I stopped going to class when the lesson was, "This is a terrestrial planet, it's rocky," and my first exam was like, "If it's 5:45pm in Tanzina on October 15th, how many degrees is the moon above the horizon?"

[–] LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Had to do AM because it's below the horizon in the PM.

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago

I really want you to know that I appreciate this.

[–] LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 week ago

Since the speed something is moving away is dependent on the distance, something billions of light years away is absolutely not going to be moving towards us, regardless of its local orbits.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expansion_of_the_universe

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] unknownuserunknownlocation@kbin.earth 18 points 1 week ago (3 children)
[–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 43 points 1 week ago (3 children)

If something is red shifting, it's accelerating away from you. If something is blue shifting, it's accelerating towards you. An entire galaxy accelerating towards you is somewhat concerning.

[–] OrganicMustard@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Redshift comes from relative velocity (and other effects), not acceleration. Andromeda's light is blueshifted as it's moving towards us, but it's not accelerating.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago

I was going to argue with this too, but the meme says blueshifting, not blueshifted. They're right, but mostly because the meme is probably written poorly. Maybe they meant it's accelerating toward us though. Idk.

[–] yaroto98@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

On top of that, we've found that basically everything is redshifting as the universe expands. So to see a blueshifting galaxy would mean something potentially unnatural.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You know how the sound of things moving from you changes? Towards you the pitch is higher, away from you it is lower. The same happens with light. We know how some things should look like, so if they are more toward red or blue, we know their speed relative to us. Blue = towards us = "we will collide" (you also do not collide with every car with a siren where you hear that effect).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ThermonuclearEgg@hexbear.net 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I know you can't see this comment but maybe someone else will find it useful

Just like how a siren changes pitch when it's coming from a vehicle passing by due to the Doppler effect, the same thing happens to moving light sources due to relativistic effects.

Usually astronomical objects are redshifting because the universe is expanding and are thus receding away from Earth's frame of reference. Most of them are forever unreachable even if we could travel at the speed of light.

Something blueshifting means it's coming closer from Earth's frame of reference. In some cases, this could result in the galaxy colliding with ours, such as the hypothesized collision between the Andromeda Galaxy and the Milky Way

[–] HakunaHafada@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 week ago
[–] te_abstract_art@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Might be a dumb question, but if it's blue-shifting surely we wouldn't know it's far away in the first place? I thought the amount of redshift is broadly how we determine cosmic distances?

[–] mr_satan@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Armchair expert here

From my understanding blue and red shifting is mostly related to movement. Like when a firetruck run past you with sirens on, you can hear change in pitch when compared it moving towards you vs away from you.
It's a similar effect with galaxies, red shifting means that after the light was emitted the space between us has increased and the light kind of stretched out to longer wave.

Now anyone with more knowledge on the subject, please correct me.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 9 points 1 week ago

You're missing the point that the universe is expanding uniformly. That means two points acceleration away from each other is dependent on their distance apart. The further they are from each other the faster they accelerate from each other.

So GP is right. We measure red shift and infer distance.

[–] HereIAm@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes, but everything red shifts "naturally" as well as the light travels because of the expansion of the universe. So something traveling towards us will still red shift, just slightly less so. To determine distance you have to use something called the cosmic distance ladder. It consists of known properties of stellar objects that we can measure to determine the distance of objects.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TankieTanuki@hexbear.net 9 points 1 week ago

We've only got two billion years. RUN FOR YOUR LIVES

[–] molten@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago

You see an hughe comet in the sky......but which stand still and it gets bigger and bigger.

[–] tricerotops@hexbear.net 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

isnt andromeda gigantic in the night sky but weve got too much light pollution to see it normally?

anyway retvrn to alien

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›