this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2025
96 points (100.0% liked)

chat

8367 readers
270 users here now

Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.

As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.

Thank you and happy chatting!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

No, Game of Thrones didn't take place in Medieval times lmao. Dragons and wizards didn't exist in ye olde England.

It would be funny if people did this with more recent time periods and fiction. Like people genuinely thinking that victorian times had giant steampunk spider robots.

I will say it is a little concerning how often I hear people say shit unchallenged like "It takes place in the old days" about something that is a fantasy world that never actually existed. Makes me worried people can't tell fantasy from reality.

Edit: This petty rant is because I was talking about GoT with a friend and told them that the constant sexual assault put me off watching it and they were like "Yeah, but that's what it was like back then."

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Moss@hexbear.net 67 points 4 days ago (6 children)

My pet peeve is when a fantasy setting is based firmly on European medieval society, but operates in an early modern capitalist economy, instead of feudalism. This is most fantasy

[–] Terrarium@hexbear.net 28 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Right? Where are the serfs!?

[–] LaGG_3@hexbear.net 12 points 4 days ago

Writing theory dennis

[–] Edie@hexbear.net 28 points 4 days ago

It is easier to imagine [an entirely different world with magic and dragons and shit], than it is to imagine the end of capitalism.

[–] zedcell@lemmygrad.ml 24 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Capitalism's development was not such an 'all at once' phenomenon and the capstone of its supremacy still took many years after many dictatorships of the bourgeoisie were formed. England for instance, especially around its metropoles had well established manufacturing industries that were overcoming guild limitations and a thriving merchant class that were becoming embedded as the early capitalists, in like the 1600s well before steam power and the industrial revolution.

China for example is in the process of developing socialism, and a medieval fantasy world could be at the nascent developmental stages of Capitalism.

[–] Moss@hexbear.net 25 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Sure, but those developments are very focused on manufacturing. Like off the top of my head, Skyrim represents it's farmers as either independent farmers who own their own land, or wage workers employed by those farmers. They travel to towns and bring their produce to the local markets, and seemingly own all of their produce. So what do the Jarls own? They're supposed to be lords, but they are really just generic governors. Similarly, it seems that anyone in Skyrim can cut down trees if they want to, they don't need logging rights to cut and sell wood.

The Witcher 3 has a much more fleshed out economy from what I've played (only about 15 hours). The farmers, from what I can tell, are mostly wage workers, but the world is very clearly an early modern setting minus gunpowder, rather than a middle ages setting.

Agriculture is a very good benchmark for examining how an economy is represented. When a medieval fantasy setting has serfs rather than proles on a farm, it's evidence that at the very least, the writer understands that different economic systems exist.

Middle Earth seems to work in its own way, which I'm happy about. The hobbits seem to be a fairly communal society, with noble families being mostly a formality. But crucially, hobbits seem to have their own understanding of productivity and economics, and thats fun and imaginative for a fantasy setting. The worst is when writers just crowbar capitalism into a feudal-inspired society because they can't imagine anything else.

[–] carpoftruth@hexbear.net 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

for you and others that enjoyed your post, have a look at the game 'pentiment'. it's a little indie rpg set in austria in a small town straddling the late medieval and early renaissance and tells a story of social change.

[–] LaGG_3@hexbear.net 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Hard to argue that Obsidian is a "little indie" studio, but the game definitely doesn't have a bloated AAA scale.

Pentiment is one of Josh Sawyer's pet projects and a delightful game!

[–] carpoftruth@hexbear.net 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

oh no kidding, I didn't realize obsidian was the dev. frankly I didn't think it was possible that this type of game would be made by anyone but some indie studio

[–] huf@hexbear.net 4 points 3 days ago

if they thought about it at all, they probably decided the jarls collect rent in cash, like land lords did in the 1800s (or today, for that matter) from their tenant farmers.

a cash based economy in medieval times? lol

blob-no-thoughts

[–] RedWizard@hexbear.net 12 points 4 days ago

This still could be feudal in its decline which saw the emergence of market economies, but generally I agree. I've soften on that opinion as I learned more about the social and economic development of merchant lead reorganization.

[–] AssortedBiscuits@hexbear.net 6 points 3 days ago

Peasants have to annually pay their feudal lord one (1) gold coin that they were somehow able to procure despite living miles away from the nearest city in the middle of a village nobody from that nearest city knows exist.

[–] huf@hexbear.net 4 points 3 days ago

and all the anachronistic plate armor too! as a setting, "medieval times" is fantasy even without the magic

[–] uglyface@hexbear.net 38 points 4 days ago (1 children)

My biggest pet peeve is when something actually does take place in medieval times or Roman times or [insert past time period] but they are in the ruins of said times. Like in Ancient Greece all those buildings were new and brightly colored with paint, why are they in the white marble ruins of the society lol.

[–] Thallo@hexbear.net 9 points 4 days ago

And they all have English accents

[–] SovietBeerTruckOperator@hexbear.net 33 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I used to be a bit of a medieval history nerd and my friend got annoyed with how many "medieval facts" I liked to blurt out in simple conversation. So I ended up proposing a TV show called "In Medieval Times" where I would be dressed as a king eating a big ass chunk of mutton and he'd be dressed as a Jester and just angry and depressed all the time.

[–] Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net 20 points 4 days ago

Lmao I love it

[–] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 10 points 4 days ago

I'd watch the hell out of that

[–] Speaker@hexbear.net 34 points 4 days ago (1 children)

They're obviously saying Medieval Times, the franchised dinner theatre production.

[–] Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net 19 points 4 days ago
[–] came_apart_at_Kmart@hexbear.net 32 points 4 days ago (1 children)

there used to be dragons in olden times though. like the Welsh flag is about this dragon that used to defend the kingdom.

his name was Mike and he got killed in a car accident in the 1970's, marking the transition to modernity.

[–] Robert_Kennedy_Jr@hexbear.net 16 points 4 days ago (1 children)

My dad convinced his current girlfriend that there used to be dragon spiders that could fly and spit flaming venom.

[–] LaGG_3@hexbear.net 30 points 4 days ago (2 children)

That and they believe people were walking around trading DnD gold for stuff like it's a fantasy RPG

[–] Crucible@hexbear.net 20 points 4 days ago

Generally people have no idea how the modern economy works let alone a medieval one

[–] gay_king_prince_charles@hexbear.net 9 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Didn't the value of coinage used to be held in the metal itself, not trust? I thought that coins used to be semiprecious metals and occasionally precious metals.

[–] Lyudmila@hexbear.net 13 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

While that was once true, you're off by like 500-1000 years on the timeline for gold being a commonly struck currency, depending on what part of the world we're talking about.

Early Lydian coinage was like 40-60% gold and the rest silver, in an alloy called Electrum.

The first gold and silver coinage was issued by Croesus in the 6th century BCE, and then Cyrus the Great ran with that bimetallic system when he introduced coinage to the Achaemenid Empire, but that was pretty much the only time til the 15th century Golden age of Genovese banking, almost two thousand years later that gold coinage was again commonly used.

The Roman accounting system was based around the as, which was a bronze or copper coin, and then multiples of that, which were generally issued in silver or alloys like orichalcum (brass).

Charlemagne introduced the Carolingian coinage system which was silver denominated. This was the official coinage for the HRE for a few hundred years and directly led to more recent coinage.

However, debasement of currency was quite common during both of these eras and while sterling silver was pretty much always used in the British for example, other supposedly equivalent coins struck elsewhere would have entirely different metal compositions and the values became really hard to track as a result, so the origins of coinage became a more important factor than the supposed face value.

Under the Milanese House of Sforza, Genoa basically had the first two banks in Europe and went absolutely buckwild financing the entire continent with gold coins backed by slavery and set the stage for the colonization of the new world and transatlantic slave trade over the next few centuries.


TLDR: In the middle ages, gold coins were something that most people would never see or touch, there's like a 2000 year gap surrounding this era in which the entire continent of Europe pretty much just didn't use gold coins for major denominations that people would actually use because they didn't have access to gold.

There's also a lot more nuance to how coinage was actually used (or how it wasn't) in the medieval economy, but I'm sure someone else will help elucidate this as this is something I don't know much about.

[–] Tiocfaidhcaisarla@hexbear.net 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Do you have any book recs about the rise of financing by way of the Sforzas?

[–] Lyudmila@hexbear.net 3 points 3 days ago

It's not specifically or exclusively about Genovese financing in this era, but Before Columbus: Exploration and Colonisation from the Mediterranean to the Atlantic, 1229-1492 by Felipe Fernandez-Armesto was suggested to me by someone back on r/CTH about the rise of colonialism in this era.

[–] insurgentrat@hexbear.net 7 points 4 days ago

We find evidence of lots of tokens being traded around, as well as ledgers keeping track of debt. Barter societies seem to be somewhat mythical, but so does extensive use of currency.

It seems more common that people just kept track of stuff owed or stores issued chits indicating credit. There's some evidence of some of these chits being used very far from the store that issued them which is pretty cool.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Erika3sis@hexbear.net 27 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The issue isn't really with the dragons and wizards and steampunk mechs, though, so much as that the whole world of the work is fictional. Like if someone were to say that The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy takes place in or about the late 1970s, I wouldn't see much of a point in disputing it even though the Earth is decidedly not a computer built by mice to calculate the ultimate question to which the answer is 42.

[–] Keld@hexbear.net 28 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Obviously not, that would be ludicrous. It was COMMISSIONED by mice.

[–] Erika3sis@hexbear.net 13 points 4 days ago

Oh yeah, sorry, of course.

[–] SpiderFarmer@hexbear.net 26 points 4 days ago

Game of Thrones's politics was at least based around the War of Roses.

But funnily enough I was thinking this morning of how much "Medievel" stuff is just a hodgepodge. I didn't realize how inaccurate a lot of that stuff was till middle school or so.

[–] SoyViking@hexbear.net 19 points 4 days ago (3 children)

My pet peevee with fantasy is that it seems to be built on the European medieval world. I'd love to see something taking place in an Indian or Islamic or Aztec or whatever setting.

[–] Chump@hexbear.net 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You might dig The Lions of Al-Rassan. Set in a fictionalized Andalusia during an Islamic ascendency

[–] insurgentrat@hexbear.net 8 points 4 days ago

Amazing book. If wistful bittersweet was condensed into ink on pages it would be this.

I've never seen someone do the reconquista from a tragic point of view before.

[–] buckykat@hexbear.net 11 points 4 days ago

You could try Mo Dao Zu Shi for a Chinese flavored feudal fantasy settings. It's good and also pretty gay.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Carl@hexbear.net 17 points 4 days ago (3 children)

"Yeah, but that's what it was like back then."

There's so many things like this where the pop culture expectation is completely wrong but it's self-reinforcing so even movie directors who know better have to go along with it. Give me a movie about gladiators where most of the fights are like WWE matches and the stars all do advertisement spots for money, dammit!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] CthulhusIntern@hexbear.net 15 points 4 days ago

It's easier to say that it takes place in medieval times than saying "it takes place in a fantasy setting inspired by medieval Europe."

[–] CeliacMcCarthy@hexbear.net 13 points 4 days ago

"It takes place in the old days" about something that is a fantasy world that never actually existed

people yearning for the return of a mythical golden age you say

[–] KrupskayaPraxis@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 3 days ago

Then authors shouldn't base their worlds on medieval life

[–] BelieveRevolt@hexbear.net 15 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I'm going to start a new conspiracy theory that says wizards used to be real and all over the place until Christians managed to eradicate all witchcraft during the Dark Ages.

[–] TraschcanOfIdeology@hexbear.net 11 points 4 days ago

Change Christianity for capitalism and patriarchy and you have the non-fiction book 'caliban and the witch'

[–] KobaCumTribute@hexbear.net 14 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

And then on top of that it's usually more a pastiche riffing on the early modern period anyways.

[–] Damarcusart@hexbear.net 7 points 3 days ago (2 children)

And why does every goddamn fantasy story have to take place in these pseudo-medieval times anyway? Because Tolkein had a hard-on for feudalism? Why not have a fantasy world set in like, an ancient bronze age/chacolithic sort of society? Where "civilisation" is only a few centuries old and magic itself is a kind of new thing as well? Or one where the technology has developed based on the fantasy elements? Don't need crop rotation when you can have druids replenish the soil, or proper coking furnaces when you have fire mages who can make extreme heat with a spell. Damn. Now I'm getting into the "magic as labour" thing again.

[–] octobob@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

There are a near infinite number of manga and anime that approach this topic / setting differently.

Black Clover is what you're describing almost to a T. Its premise is "magic is so commonplace and everyone can do it that it's strange that the protagonist is one of the few who can't do it".

I quit this show after a few episodes though. I like shonen well enough but the near constant screaming was just not my bag of what I was trying to watch at the time. I've heard it tones down on that and gets better in the later seasons though.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UltraGreen@hexbear.net 6 points 3 days ago

"Medieval" to me has always been an aesthetic/environmental choice for media. Medieval as a term, is very Euro-centric and I think it's better to just refer to the century or year something takes place. "Medieval" times for Europe was a lot different than the experiences and society of the Arab world or China.

[–] Hestia@hexbear.net 4 points 3 days ago

There's medieval high-fantasy and low fantasy. Medieval refers to the the tech level and then the higher fantasy you go the more fantastical it gets with magic.

load more comments
view more: next ›