this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2025
364 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

66687 readers
4877 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
  • Apple's progress with Siri and artificial intelligence has been slow, and features promised in June remain delayed.
  • At a Siri team meeting, senior director Robby Walker acknowledged the frustration within the team, describing the delays as "ugly."
  • Features like Siri understanding personal context and taking action based on a user’s screen are still not ready and may not make it into iOS 19.
  • Challenges include quality issues that caused these features to malfunction up to a third of the time and conflicts with Apple's marketing division over showcasing incomplete features.
  • Apple has withdrawn related advertisements and added disclaimers on its website, citing extended development times.
  • Senior executives, including Craig Federighi and John Giannandrea, are reportedly taking personal accountability for the delays.
  • Walker emphasized that the team’s work is impressive and that the delayed features will be released once they meet Apple’s standards.
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 2 points 57 minutes ago
  • Take screenshot of screen
  • Send screenshot to Claude 3.7 or any other decent chatbot. Even GPT-3 is light years smarter than current Siri, but I don’t know it if can analyze images
  • Run Claude’s response through a text-to-Siri-speech layer

There, now Siri can see your screen. Why can’t Apple accomplish this? Why are megacorps so inept?

[–] flop_leash_973@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

This whole thing is a textbook example of how bad shady marketing today and can really cause you a lot of pain tomorrow. If Apple had not been so quick to let PR write checks their ass was not ready to cash the conversation around Siri would still just be the casual jokes about it sucking, and not more serious public blackeyes.

"Taking personal accountablility", but not a paycheck.

[–] drperil@lemm.ee 4 points 2 hours ago

Ok… this is what it is I suppose, every business wants to be on the AI train, but, this seems like an opportunity to make the next iPhone, or at least a version of it, without AI as a selling point.

I’d be very happy indeed to have an option that was entirely devoid of, and incompatible with, any form of AI and I know I’m not alone in that. Sell it as prioritizing privacy or respecting consumers desire to opt out, whatever the marketing folks come up with. But that would be my next phone in a heartbeat.

[–] midori_matcha@lemmy.world 24 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Apple Intelligence hasn't been much better than old Siri on unsupported devices.

For a third of the time, she has a hard time recognizing the trigger word the first time (usually "Siri" rather than "Hey Siri"), and not perform my commands when all I want her to do is act as a voice-activated light switch.

What exactly is the trillion dollar company struggling with here?

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Interesting timing, where I’m seeing the opposite. All my Amazon devices suddenly can’t turn on a simple light switch, and one appears to have somehow factory reset.

However Siri works perfectly. I use a button rather than wake word, but then it dies actually turn on my light

[–] fishy@lemmy.today 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

It's been theorized that Amazon is progressively making all Alexa devices worse so they can sell you on a subscription based AI version.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 11 minutes ago

Maybe, but they may lose more customers than they expect ….

There are privacy based devices for “always listening” voice assistants coming on strong

I already use Siri with a button for a lot. recently it seems able to recognize more of my smarthome devices and it will now prompt to forward more complex queries to ChatGPT

I’m really down to the intercom feature being the only reason to keep Alexa - I can’t control the devices my kids use at their mom’s house

[–] ileanallama@lemmy.world 64 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

they should embrace it and be the anti AI tech giant

[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 22 points 16 hours ago

Hell, if they genuinely do that, I might even consider switching sides.

[–] ABetterTomorrow@lemm.ee 19 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

AI isn’t the answer. Plain and simple.

[–] turnip@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 hours ago

AI can make me a video of the brave little toaster suplexing Putin, to sit on that kind of power is silly.

[–] RichardDegenne@lemm.ee 9 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] derpgon@programming.dev 13 points 7 hours ago

LLMs are the question, "no" is the answer.

[–] MattTheProgrammer@lemmy.world 36 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I don't fucking want AI in my phone, so take it out and be done with it.

[–] TheFriar@lemm.ee 4 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Right? Hink of everything else I can do with that space and computing power. Not to mention the fuckin environmental devastation we’d curb.

[–] absentbird@lemm.ee 1 points 13 hours ago

Siri has run locally since iOS 15

[–] baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 241 points 1 day ago (8 children)

This is what happens when you get pressure to please shareholders instead of customers. Historically, Apple has been good about revealing and delivering at the same time. But caught with their pants down during the AI hype, they fell into the trap so many other tech companies do. (Tesla is the undisputed heavyweight champ here)

Now that they’ve been burned by all this, here’s hoping they learn from it and return to form.

[–] Xatolos@reddthat.com 64 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Historically, Apple has been good about revealing and delivering at the same time.

I'm not so sure about that. MobileMe, iTunes Ping, Vision Pro, and AirPower (their wireless charging pad) come to mind.

"You're holding it wrong"

[–] baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 59 points 1 day ago (1 children)

All of these things except the AirPad were released at about the same time they were announced. That’s what I was getting at.

[–] Xatolos@reddthat.com 8 points 18 hours ago

While they did get released when they said, they didn't get released in the state that was stated/indicated though.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 7 points 18 hours ago

I don't think tech companies got caught with their pants down, they just hit the far end of the S curve regarding growth.

A lot of other "tech" companies in the past saw massive leaps in tech capabilities, then hit a wall once tech got to a certain level. Computing has hit its wall.

[–] DrCake@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Apple has had so many misses recently. The current AI stuff, Vision Pro and maybe the 16e (too early to tell) form stuff that has released. But also this Siri AI, Air Power wireless charging pad, Apple Car project.

The Apple Watch is probably the last hit they had (the M series chips are good but not really new products, but maybe that’s me being overly harsh)

maybe that’s me being overly harsh

That's actually probably fair: the M-chips are impressive, but they're just an evolution that's come out of the A-series stuff for their phones.

Which, of course, Apple bought and did not actually create. (I'll let someone else argue the merits of buy vs do it yourself, especially when you give your aquisition endless R&D funds to make good shit.)

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 159 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The whole industry is a shit show right now with the "AI race"

I don't want to be a software developer anymore because it's become a permanent deathmarch toward the next buzzword.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

We just had a town hall with our CEO and they came right out and said we need to simultaneously add AI and not add AI to our products, because customers are both excited and nervous about it. Our competitors are putting "AI" everywhere in their marketing, while we're just trucking along making a quality product.

Our software works in a very dangerous environment, where mistakes could cost millions in damage and potentially risk human lives. So the end user just sees "AI" as a liability. But the decision makers as to what product to use are removed from conditions on the ground and respond well to marketing BS.

We actually do use AI with some parts of the product (e.g. curve fitting on past data for better predictions), but we need to be very careful about how we advertise that.

It's dumb. Just pick the product based on what fits your operations best, don't pick based on buzzwords...

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 1 hour ago

Our software works in a very dangerous environment, where mistakes could cost millions in damage and potentially risk human lives.

I mean attorneys don't seem to have a problem submitting case law that AI hallucinated.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

An AI age in software development will yield massive returns to anybody who makes it to "senior designer-developer" by the end of this decade, IMHO, if only because the totally fucked up unmantainable code bases made by "automated junior developers" will much more quickly reach end of life (the point were it costs more to try and fix/upgrade them than to rewrite them) and need to replaced (and the way to do that is to reverse engineer the Software Requirements from the existing apps an then build from scratch something new that satisfies those requirements, something which LLMs are entirelly unable to do).

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 14 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe your boss can develop software all by his or her self now lop.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 2 points 1 hour ago

Better yet, ask the AI to do it.

[–] Cocopanda@futurology.today 6 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

I can careless for Ai Siri. There’s no real need. I barely use Siri anyways.

[–] NotJohnSmith@feddit.uk 13 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I think the phrase is "I couldn't care less".

[–] TK420@lemmy.world -2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I know the phrase is “I couldn’t care less”

[–] Quadhammer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

The phrase is "i could care less but i dont"

[–] PeteZa@lemm.ee 3 points 14 hours ago

I only use it for voice controls.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 13 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

A while ago I set up a Siri shortcut that opens ChatGPT in voice mode. Now I can just say “hey siri, ask the demon” and in a moment start talking to ChatGPT with no further commands and zero buttons pressed throughout. It answers in voice mode.

This is pretty useful for things like doing units conversions while my hands are sticky during cooking, or just doing simple information lookups while my hands are busy. I use ChatGPT responsibly, never trusting it for things that aren’t one-dimensional information retrievals and summarization. It works great for me for like 50-60% of the things I used to Google. Internet search is, once again, just for finding websites, like it should be.

What’s my point? We don’t need Siri Apple Intelligence to ship. There’s already something better. And it runs on my iPhone 14, which isn’t even compatible with Apple Flatulence.

[–] invertedspear@lemm.ee 16 points 18 hours ago

I’ve never used Apple intelligence and Siri alone has done a fine job for unit conversions, info lookups, and most any other things. No need to fire up chat GPT for those basic uses

[–] Oisteink@feddit.nl 48 points 1 day ago (2 children)

How is this bad news? Dire situation?? They are not where they want to be with this “feature” so they delay it. Sounds like a smart move. Probably second best option to just dropping it

[–] Xatolos@reddthat.com 37 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Biggest issue is they had a huge marketing campaign based on all these things Apple Intelligence could do, with dates saying when it will come and that you needed to buy the newest iPhone for them to happen. Those dates have come and gone and still no signs of it. If the next iPhone comes out and they still haven't released it, they risk a huge lawsuit of mis-advertising. It doesn't matter whether users use the feature or not, it was advertised, and very directly.

Normally, Apple is cautious/careful how they phrase things about their devices so they could back away if something doesn't go right or doesn't do what was suggested/implied. But they can't this time.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 9 points 23 hours ago

Everyone who cheer-led the AI garbage trucks moved up in the world. Across the board. All over ther world.

Turns out they were very, very wrong and quite stupid.

Now Apple (and everyone else) has to roll all that back and try to save face.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 34 points 1 day ago (1 children)

these features to malfunction up to a third of the time

That's "ai" for you lol

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago

Anyone who isn't completely high from huffing AI brainfarts saw this coming.

[–] Kyle_The_G@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't want that on my phone. I just want a dumb program that sets alerts and schedules, I don't want it interpreting information and I doubt most people really need that function on a phone.

[–] tauren@lemm.ee 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, but smartphones have stopped offering anything new. I recently upgraded my 8-year-old device, and I hardly notice any difference. I bet other customers see that too. They are desperately trying to find the next big thing. It's astonishing, however, that all these companies completely ignore the fact that their customers don't even want AI features.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ToadOfHypnosis@lemm.ee 16 points 1 day ago

AI is overrated in almost every implementation that isn’t scientific research. The buzzword stock hype machine fake growth cycles are going to kill the tech industry.

[–] twinnie@feddit.uk 20 points 1 day ago (4 children)

If they know Siri’s shit then why can’t I have my power button back?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›