The funny thing is that the more you know about missiles, the less this looks like one. I'm sure some truther has already claimed to know the model of missile used, but I'll say if this isn't a plane, it would need to be a very bespoke missile.
A missle is nothing more than an object forcefully propelled at a target.
So it’s both true a plane hit the pentagon as well as a missle.
many people are saying this
This is some real conspiracioid shit here. Did America really need excuses to do absolutely horrid shit throughout it's history?
This is a trap just like JFK bullet trajectory minutae is a trap. CIA malfeasance is totally believable but the end results were: shooting a guy in the head and hitting buildings with planes.
yeah like we dropped a nuke on like 200k japanese civilians and came up with excuses after the fact, we dont really need a reason to do mass murder, we just do it
None of the countries the hijackers came from were invaded by the US. If anything, those countries are US allies. If the whole thing was completely made up by the US, wouldn't the US have fake Iranian/Afghani/Iraqi/Syrian/Libyan/Yemeni IDs instead of fake Saudi/UAE/Egyptian IDs?
i could see it being a cia fuckup of some kind, training terrorists and then 
when they use their training to blow up your shit. but yeah, if it were a fake, why wouldnt they just cover up who these guys are?
The important thing is the Pentagon blew up so a good thing happened
But they blew it up themselves probably to destroy files though
Net positive for them
I can believe that the plane got shot down in the fields and spinner into a heroic patriotic sob story because nobody was out there to really confirm anything. But the missile striking the pentagon is just silly.
Okay maybe, but like, why would they do that? The United States obviously doesn't care about it's own civilians and if it was to be that directly planned, why not just use a plane like the towers? There were people on the plane that's purported to hit the pentagon, don't they have families that can confirm they exist? Why would the US Military use this as an excuse to bomb itself, but only with a missile? What's the point and what was the benefit of a missile over just using a plane like all the other attacks that day?
Is the conspiracy that there were a bunch of poor African Americans living in the Pentagon so they shot a missile at it? I really don't see why they would shoot a missile at the Pentagon, and also have to fake a plane taking off with hundreds of passengers, staff, hijackers etc involved
a point they bring up on the trueanon episode about this is that the official story isn't that believable. the guy who supposedly flew the plane that day (hani hanjour) kept failing exams for flight school and his instructors reported him to the FAA multiple times later recalling that "he could not fly at all."
but on 9/11 he gets in an unfamiliar plane, flies it to arlington, and then executes a tight 330 degree corkscrew down thousands of feet to smash exactly into the target face of the building at 850kph
idk, something seems fishy about that
I could teach you how to do that in 20 minutes in X-Plane 6.0
later recalling that "he could not fly at all."
The procedures and techniques necessary to safely and legally operate a commercial aircraft as well as to be considered "able to fly at all" by pilot instructors are far harder than flying into the twin towers
Yeah and the actual pilots got the hard parts out of the way, of starting up the plane, navigating the airport, communicating with ATC, and taking off. "he could not fly at all" means jack shit when the goal is to crash the plane
to be considered "able to fly at all" by pilot instructors are far harder than flying into the twin towers
But he didn't fly into the towers, he flew into the Pentagon.
A 5-story building, at ground level, while doing 850 kph in a civilian airliner, less than 20 ft above ground. On the first try.
After executing said corkscrew maneuver in an unfamiliar airplane.
Oh yeah thats the Pentagon guy, no that was easy too, give me 25 minutes I'm not even kidding. He just approximately landed on the building going full speed. The only hard part about actually landing is hitting a safe speed at the proper angle and not sliding off the end of the runway due to too much speed.
i mean it's not like he had to land
New theory: all the hijackers crashed the planes by accident
I am a 9/11 radicalist, I don't believe there were any planes at all, not even holograms, and the towers and Pentagon just did that
Ok, where'd the plane go? Surely the plane that they said hit the pentagon had to go somewhere? Or did aliens take it like mh370?
No missile hit the Pentagon on 9/11. It was a plane u dunce.
Where is the plane then?
Yeah that's the big hole (lol) in the missile theory. There was a plane that took off and disappeared.
Either it hit the Pentagon or there was some large-scale coverup of disappearing a plane, passengers, and crew, plus a missile launch and whatever coverup was necessary for that.
That's one extremely fast moving, low-flying passenger plane to be able to strike a building like that and especially to completely destroy itself without any traces of plane left from the wreckage.
It must have been one hell of a bullseye.
No photographic or video footage of a plane wreck near the site. All nearby footage confiscated except for this extremely grainy, 2 FPS video that the state released themselves (THAT STILL CLEARLY SHOWS A MISSILE)
CNN reports that no evidence of a plane crash near the Pentagon was found
Claimed flight path to the Pentagon has direct contradictions to the damage done
THAT STILL CLEARLY SHOWS A MISSILE
it shows a collection of white pixels roughly dildo-shaped, a characteristic shared by aircraft & missiles. i don't find this very compelling, or a guy expecting to find giant airplane pieces & not. if it directly hit, wouldn't the debris be inside the building? and on fire?
the expectations of a "normal" plane crash with lots of identifiable debris rests on how the vast majority of planes don't crash directly into solid objects, except the ground, which is easier to contrast from a building.
I think the biggest problem with 9/11 conspiracies is how much less cooler they make it
i support this one just because the idea that the pentagon needed to blow itself up to get rid of evidence or something when they have at least one paper shredder in that building is hilarious
it's like some sort of liberal brainworm that the dod can't normally destroy evidence and instead needed a few bad actors to set up an elaborate rube goldberg machine including disappearing an entire plane just to destroy three pieces of paper
I thought a plane crashed into the Pentagon. No?
WTC7 will never make sense to me, motherfucker just crumbles because of a bunch of fires and debris. Come on, I just don't buy it. That and the people who supposedly heard explosions on the towers, eh let me doubt. As for the Pentagon I don't think a cruise missile did the job but the available footage is dogshit and there's no other angles at all, still I have no doubts it was an airplane.
Regardless, I remember people back then saying that 9/11 would spawn a new era of reduced civil liberties, increased militarism, surveillance state and so on, these people were mostly leftists and disregarded as crazy. Well these "conspiracies" turned out to be true.
So this is footage of a missile at ground level going directly into the side of the Pentagon - why would the missile be at ground level when it struck? It'd need to have launched and then dived down to ground level.
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip