178
Dumbest shit I’ve heard from Trump all day.
“Doctor Hannibal Lecter, he will have you for dinner. You know that he will have you for dinner.”
— Donald Trump, at a rally in Wisconsin.
Hopefully he meant for the day.
There's still a few hours to go..
Amendments are apparently just one more thing that Trump doesn’t understand.
Changing amendments is no problem when you have judges to "reinterpret" them at will
The list of things he does understand would be much shorter.
List:
-Eat hamberder and lie
-Do crime
I don't even know if he actually understands what a hamberder is.
like maybe that it's tasty and how to scarf them. but... not much else.... like even the whole you-have-to-pay-for-them thing.
Oh yeah, likely just the "eat" part.
Meanwhile, JD Vance sits in the corner sweating
And not just cos he's sitting on a particularly sexy couch
Pence just whistling and walking away...
Dean! Sam! Bobby!
If he's sweating, it's only because he's afraid that Trump will die before the election.
I swear that Trump's handlers and/or Peter Thiel got him to pick Vance because Vance is all in on Project 2025. They don't give a crap about Trump as long as he lives long enough for the election to be stolen for him. Then when he drops we'll be stuck with President Vance who will gleefully run with all the fascist crap they can think of.
only if President Vance can get off the couch.
(excuse me, I just vommited writing that.)
Come on. If there's one thing we all know, it's that Vance can get off on a couch.
- He really wants to run against Joe Biden still.
- He wants a mechanism to get rid of Vance
- Both?
- He has no sense of irony.
yeah pretty clearly this on top of #s 1/2. He's been saying people convicted of a crime need to always serve time behind bars, yet his convicted ass remains outside
Is it he knows that if he wins Vance can get him removed because of the dementia?
Good! The Constitution OF COURSE can be Changed! UNLESS it's AFTER a bunch of 6 Year Olds get Murdered then the Constitution is PERFECT DON'T TOUCH IT LET ME KILL CHILDREN I'M PRO LIFE!
At this point, we're watching Trump disintegrate day by day and virtually minute by minute.
I'm not sure if he's even going to make it to the election. It's really starting to look like he's going to come apart at the seams before that.
I would like to believe that but there is way too much energy behind this guy. He would have to implode horrifically.
No - I mean Trump personally. Not the Trump campaign, which is a separate thing.
Yeah - the campaign, between the cultish rank and file and the cynically power-hungry donors and operatives - still has a lot of energy.
But Trump the person is visibly coming apart at the seams.
Trump the person came apart at the seams a long time ago. Trump as a “thing” still seems very strong.
Can't congress just impeach the VP?
they can also impeach the president, and, in fact, impeached Trump twice, for all the good it did.
The impeachment process relies on good faith of both parts of Congress. The Senate, controlled by Republicans, at first denied there was evidence, then when presented with obvious evidence decided that they were okay with it and no punishment was needed on a verdict already established (the actual impeachment from the House). It's like the jurors agreed there was a crime, but the judge said it wasn't a big deal and let him free.
There was literally a republican senator that said he was convinced of all the charges but that he didn't think trump should be removed.
Mitt Romney. Had a chance to do the right thing, but followed the party line.
Mitt Romney was literally the only Republican senator who voted to remove Trump for both impeachment trials. Not sure what you're referring to but all the other Republicans voting party over country are to blame.
https://www.romney.senate.gov/romney-delivers-remarks-impeachment-vote/
https://www.romney.senate.gov/romney-statement-impeachment-vote/
Had they impeached Trump after Jan. 6th the. Trump would be ineligible to run for president now and we wouldn't be in this mess
I stand corrected on part of it. He did vote guilty on the first impeachment article, just not the second for obstruction of Congress. I guess at that point it didn't matter, as the Senate overall wasn't going to remove Trump anyway.
Right, there were 52 other Republican senators who could have had some spine and voted for their country over their party, but didn't. If anyone should be singled out for being at fault, it's Mitch McConnell, who voted against Trump's second impeachment conviction, even though he stated "There's no question that President Trump is practically and morally responsible for provoking the events of the day". As the senate majority leader, he could have whipped the other Republicans to stand up to Trump, but didn't, effectively finalizing handing the party over to Trump.
He's projecting, again. What did his whole administration do, but cover for him?
He's threatened and taking a scattershot approach.
It's called narcisstic collapse.
It sure is.
Is he almost dead already?
How about now?
He’s just mad pence is worse at it.
Also that would be an amendment.
Furthermore he’s the sort of person who’d lose his shit upon learning FDR couldn’t walk.
Dotard saying dotard things
Butthurt little baby sez what now?
I'm not a fan of this. The government covers up things for the sake of stability and this is one of those things. If your president is incapacitated, he doesn't resign, and isn't removed, publicly admitting that he's incapacitated will welcome all types of attacks from our enemies.
I know that he doesn't like Mike Pence anymore, but this is a bit too far.
No way in hell Trump can get 3/4 of states to ratify an amendment to the constitution. This guy is a fucking clown.
...so he wants to retro actively oust Pence?
Why is there all that glare on trump? Is he in a plastic box or sometime?
Yes, he's doing a Gabby Giffords at many of his rallies lol
Oh, what does that mean?
Nutjob.
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2024
178 points (95.4% liked)
politics
19098 readers
3289 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS