You're an unserious person
Maybe your intention with this comment was more noble, but it's full of typos/autocorrect and odd tense (I wasnt going to be paid?) that make it very difficult to follow?
But from what I can read, your position is that the burden of proof for fraud is on the audience and not the person creating the deceptive work? I don't agree. And if I start a business, I need to hold trademark for my logo and patents for my novel designs and utilities - SO THAT I DEFEND MYSELF WHEN CHALLENGED.
Why isn't your assertion that OP should need to provide proof that their work is original OR openly label it as AI (theft). Again, in this case OP is working to pass this off as original work (as you can see by them literally taking extra time to watermark their counterfeit work).
OP is posting AI slop and plagiarizing other people's work. Lead image seems a cyanide and happiness cartoon, but it's a blatent ripoff, and they watermarked it with their own username to boot. And no communication out transparency around any of that as well
External validation!!!!
The secrets will not be exposed... Unless you are willing to join the black parade...
Those don't sound like people worth being friends with.
"AI girlfriend, do you like me for me? Like even if I didn't pay you?"
"I really want to answer, sweetie... Just deposit more crypto first"
This might be a hard pill, but... A lot of selfish people like to be selfish, selfishly. The point of a community is doing a bit more work personally or sometimes making a light sacrifice so that others do better as well.
You should actually slow down and re-read your statement, maybe you don't know how you sound? Feels like you have kind of a , "sure, I could help out homeless people with some spare change, but where is my personal benefit in that? Now, im always very happy to find the person that I give $.50 in change to and they give me a dollar back to defy the stereotype, but those people are few and far between IME."
Dude, give your AI girlfriend some crypto so you can ask her a question, and then ask her to define "empathy" for you.
I'm sorry if any of that is a hard pill to swallow.
"OH, WELL NOW YOU'VE GONE TOO FAR!!!"
- "Artists" who have been willingly playing in the unapologetic hate clubhouse for years after the owner nazi saluted twice at the American nazi party rally 2.0
Wouldn't it be nice if people like shithead steve could have their faces melt like the Nazi in Indiana Jones?
I appreciate the suggestion, I'll look into it. That said, im a firm believer in the schools of thought around calculated risk. Letting them fall sure, but into a somewhat safe or even lightly padded area - enough to feel the shock and some light pain that is informative in teaching them to be more careful and internally weigh potential risk against their future actions, but also avoiding said threat to life and limb.
Personally, I'm of the mind that a lot of the "just let them fall" theory is more to soothe the guilt of the parents and many of those "walk it off" kids had multiple TBIs and grew up to be one eyed, nine toed, frontal lobe damaged trump voters.













Hard to say, but we needed to leave a minimum level of a learning curve to using any computer, not a PHD required, but enough to bore the red hats. As soon as Apple's toddlerfication of smashing BIG, bright, colorful, soft shapes made it so everyone in the world could gold the history of humanity's knowledge in their pocket... They started confusing their pocket with their brains. Holding knowledge doesn't mean HAVING knowledge.
The instant and infinite false confidence that magic slab gives hateful idiots was our downfall as a species.