meco03211

Pretty sure that's what any president does anymore with EOs from the other party.

Yup. Remember when target announced they wouldn't pursue charges for theft under $25? That was essentially the "president" (ceo) telling the "field offices" (stores) not to go after those crimes. It doesn't change the fact those are still crimes and a store could still go after it against the order.

While this case is fresh, the point of it being moot is that there are not ostensibly two sides in active disagreement that need the court to rule. Consider whenever you hear about old laws that aren't enforced (like sodomy laws or race mixing). If it's not being enforced, how do you get a lawsuit? There is no "injured party" or someone with a grievance. Who would defend it? You could bankrupt a district by continually challenging laws that aren't being enforced. Now you might think you still want this case to go forward since it's obviously unconstitutional, but what stops the "other" side from challenging whatever they don't like whenever they want?

To them, it's worth a little suffering as long as the "other team" doesn't get a win.

It's not that it's worth suffering. It's that it must be done despite any suffering. There's the lovely saying that a MAGAt will gleefully eat a shit sandwich if they think a liberal will have to smell their breath. They see a win as only possible if liberals are somehow losing. Even if both sides would benefit, even if their side would benefit more from some action, they must not let liberals have a "win". It's a psychotic depth to their zero sum game.

Nah. Hitler was only captured in black and white photography. The other one is colored so it can't be him.

No no. I want them to know it was me.

When was that confirmed? Another article said the WV governor had initially made that claim but walked it back after being told they were in critical condition.

A question I certainly feel pretty much answers itself. Though, with this administration and how they have bent judges to their will before, I haven't the foggiest fucking idea how the courts will answer it.

There's like a 6 month grace period after the SoL if there's a problem with the indictment, where they could refile. I'm not sure what issues they're allowed to fix with that grace period, but there is some time there.

You're just an angsty twat that got caught up trying to defend some extremely minor and inconsequential nuance. This has caused you to dig your heels in without even arguing correctly anymore. In a different portion you were arguing there were only 2 sizes of gametes. You were intending it to be 2 types. But now that you've said size you can't bring yourself to admit you were wrong on something so pathetically inconsequential. Just admit where you said the wrong thing and shut up about the stupid minutia you keep crying about.

You're confusing size and type. You can have two types with more than two sizes of a thing.

Arctic foxes and fruit flies. And before responding, be sure to educate yourself on the difference between what constitutes size and "egg and sperm". Those are entirely different concepts.