meco03211

Designers were probably thinking "well this is stupid but it's what I'm paid to do and I didn't decide to have a fucking bed be always online". The execs that made the decision are probably thinking "why didn't the designers think of this problem and prevent it? We should fire some. "

Only when fascists want to use passive voice.

Fuck! It's 5:49PM now. Guess I'll wait until tomorrow to try again.

The "common sense" answer is generally broad and vague. It purposefully avoids nuance and reality. "If I want to build a garage on my property, why does the government need to be involved?" That person doesn't think of the drug dealer doing that to cook meth right next door and possibly blow up the block or the idiot that doesn't understand how to build a structure and it collapses in the first stiff wind.

Wonderful. It's 10:43AM right now. I'll start at 5:37PM. Thanks for the tip!

Destroying the White House physically and legally.

Gotta imagine that's a combination of personal preference and/or hospital policy. From a liability standpoint that's just easy evidence for a malpractice lawsuit if one was so inclined.

If nothing happened, vance and hegseth would have attacked Newsom for his decision saying it was obviously unnecessary. Had Newsom not closed the freeway and this happened, they would have attacked him for not doing something since it was his responsibility.

Unless you are doing lots of high quality color printing you really just need a simple black and white Laserjet. Use a kinkos or other print shop for anything fancy if needed. Could even find a local print shop if that's your jam. Colleges can also fill this role depending on enrollment requirements (if you are or have college aged kids).

So it doesn't seem like it was his flag but that of one of his staffers. I can say there is a non-negligible chance someone at my work could have something like this and I wouldn't notice. Now I'm not saying he should be praised for meeting the bare minimum requirement for condemning that flag, but unless there's more to the story proving something more insidious, I don't feel like ragging on him is the best course of action.

Likely, whatever benefits the little guy. Most people don't have a problem with copyright laws in a vacuum. It's the abuse of those by large corporate entities that are the issue.

It's not insinuating he's gay. It's insinuating that he's submissive.