this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2026
539 points (97.5% liked)

Science Memes

20830 readers
271 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 28 points 2 days ago (6 children)

I almost feel like this when hearing about "war"

"Have some sort of strategy"
"If at all possible have a larger army than the enemy"
"If step two is not possible, see step one"

This is basically the whole book.

[–] saimen@feddit.org 33 points 2 days ago (2 children)

There is one point in it I found actually useful even today in everyday life. It was something like: When you have surrounded or entrapped your enemy always leave them a way out for retreat so they won't fight as hard as if their only other option is defeat/death.

[–] yetAnotherUser@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 days ago

Woah, that hits hard. I guess I'll have to read the book now...

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

A good lesson for people that seek to assert absolute authoritarianism over folks. Corner folks too hard and given no viable alternative, desperation drives unexpected outcomes.

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 23 points 2 days ago

Maybe it was more a manual a general could hand to the rich dumbass in charge who was about to bet everyone killed and say "please review the wisdom of the great sage before making your battle plan."

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's because it was written at a time when nobles were considered the only natural choice of leadership class, so you've got military forces being lead by people with zero practical military knowledge. It's literally meant to be babies first strategy and logistics guide.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I think this is the most important factor, but at the same time anyone responsible for complex tasks should be well familiar with the value of a simple list of the task's fundamentals. It's not that they don't know these principles, but that reminders can break tunnel vision or prevent simple mistakes born of complacency.

[–] weps@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

if combat is required it is best to be victorious

[–] Seleni@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

TBF it’s technically a Daoist philosophical treatise, rather than a how-to on war. To really understand it you have to look at it from that perspective.

[–] credo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Hmm. There was also:

  • If you don’t know if you can trust them, kill them