398
submitted 6 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Trump tantrumed and even quit a debate with Joe Biden in 2020, but now he's even more emotionally volatile

Donald Trump has tried to taunt President Joe Biden by claiming he's ready for a presidential debate "anytime, anywhere." The gambit left him little choice but to immediately accept when the Biden campaign offered debate dates in June and September, and terms like not having an audience and allowing real journalists to moderate. But within mere hours it became clear that Trump and the rest of the GOP already regretted the decision.

Pretty quickly, Trump tried to change the terms of the debate, pretending that it will be held on Oct. 2 on Fox News. The Biden campaign swiftly rejected this lie, accusing Trump of "playing games," and pointing out that Trump frequently talks big but then ends up "pulling out at the last minute, or not showing up at all."

It's true, of course. Trump has a habit of promising that he'll do bold things and then backing out, whether it's his empty promises to testify at his various trials or his false claims he'll release policy proposals in a week or two. (It's been over a month of silence, for instance, since he promised he would release an abortion platform in "14 days.") In 2020, still burned by his terrible first debate with Biden, Trump refused to show up at the second and held an ego-flattering rally instead.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] NineMileTower@lemmy.world 100 points 6 months ago

Trump: My team will play football only if it’s a home game and I get to pick the referees. Also, your team doesn’t get to to play, only my team does. And if you don’t agree then I’m not showing up and your team is to blame.

[-] Untitled4774@sh.itjust.works 23 points 6 months ago

Also you’re not invited to my birthday party

[-] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 6 months ago

I read this in the voice of Seth Myers doing Trump.

Or Stephen Colbert doing Trump.

The words are too coherent to hear them as Trump.

[-] randon31415@lemmy.world 91 points 6 months ago

Biden should just invite RFK to take Trump's place if he doesn't show up. RFK would then draw from Trump voters, splitting the anti-Biden vote.

[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 54 points 6 months ago

If he doesn't show up, Biden should call Trump direct on his cell phone with a spoofed number from one of Trump's associates, and then ask him live on air why he's not at the debate, and offer to have the debate right then and there with Trump on speaker.

If you're gonna be in charge of the USA's intelligence apparatus, and your opponent is okay with weaponizing the power of that exact same apparatus against you when they feel like it, I think you should be allowed to flex with it just a little bit from time to time.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

That’s kind of the best idea out of a horrible situation I’ve heard yet

[-] OpenStars@discuss.online 60 points 6 months ago

Idea 💡: Biden tells people he will show up for a speech, with or without Trump present.

Say that Trump will refuse to show up, bc he's too weak and pathetic. Use those exact words.

Trump doesn't show = profit.

Or if Trump does show, doing his usual falling asleep during talky talk, then profit even moar!

Most likely Trump will try to do the identical thing in reverse, but everyone would see that Biden did it first.

[-] KISSmyOSFeddit@lemmy.world 39 points 6 months ago

everyone would see that Biden did it first.

Where have you been the past 10 years? Half the country just sees what Fox "News" tells them.

[-] OpenStars@discuss.online 17 points 6 months ago

Everyone who matters(TM)

The Magats are a lost cause, but the like 2-3 centrists in the Midwest who control our entire nation at this point due to the Electoral College system (and Dems refusal to do anything once elected) might be persuaded this way?

Also, now I just want to see it done regardless of utility. 😎

img

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] bazus1@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

that and farcebook. It sure explains for the current polls.

[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

Nah he'd get drugs for that. Someone pointed out the Adderall shortage lines up with Trump's sudden constant non ability to stay awake. He might have to resort to cocaine though, so we may get some random rants about wanting to have sex with his daughter again

[-] eugene171@lemmy.world 40 points 6 months ago

I encourage everyone to take a look at Fox News's front page when political stories like this hit.

The debate's basically not there, other than the occasional opinion piece about how CNN is too biased to have a fair moderator. Yesterday there was an article where some Trump stooge was saying the debate conditions were designed to make it impossible for Trunk to win.

People who already support Trump get their media from places that will make his skipping this debate into a masterful gambit and a great victory. He won't lose votes over this.

[-] Delusional@lemmy.world 27 points 6 months ago

Of course he won't lose votes over this. The guy is a deplorable menace and anyone who still supports him is a lost cause as a human being.

I remember the past debates where trump made a fool of himself like he usually does and the next day, conservative opinion stations declared that trump won the debate for absolutely no reason instead of telling the truth.

The conservative propaganda machine has done immense damage to this country and they're still attacking it on a daily basis without anyone stopping them. Nothing will get better until the misinformation machine is stopped and Americans start getting factual news again.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 31 points 6 months ago

The gambit left him little choice but to immediately accept when the Biden campaign offered debate dates in June and September

I think this is vastly understating how prominently placed is total transparent bullshit, in the Trump mental model, and how willing his followers are to it

He can simply pretend that October 2nd is the real debate, and Biden is the one trying to back out because he’s too old and scared to debate Trump. If his followers also watched news with some connection to reality, and cross checked Trump’s pretenses against it, then they’d see the lie, but they don’t and they won’t.

[-] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 7 points 6 months ago

Nah, that doesn't give Trump any advantage. He can just go on Fox any time he wants and have a "pretend debate" with no one. There are still rules to the reality Trump supporters have in their heads.

Basically, Trump supporters want to see him as better than someone else. So that other person has to play along. If you notice, the Republicans who support Trump have to pretend that he's better than them when they give speeches. It's just a modern monarchy (a conservative form of government).

Biden doesn't play along, so he actually doesn't look weak. Trump was begging for a debate and was ignored (looks weak). Biden said "let's debate" and Trump accepted. No one ever accepted Trump's debate on Fox, so rejecting it actually makes Biden look more powerful.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Pretty sure what the guy above is saying is that no one (on the right) cares about what was accepted. He's saying Trump can just say it was Oct 2 and everyone will eat it up. And if Biden doesn't show up, Trump will say "Biden weak" and everyone will eat it up. No one (on the right) will care that Trump just made up a new date and terms.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 19 points 6 months ago

I mean are they though?

Recent NYT poll had Trump leading in the several battleground states and let's fucking face it, the American voting populace is dumb AF.

A bad performance from Trump I don't think will do much of anything because Americans are just too stupid to remember or care.

[-] orbitz@lemmy.ca 20 points 6 months ago

NYT is carrying enough water for Trump they may as well be an aqua duct. Mean the polls may be accurate but it's hard to believe much of what they put out between Biden and Trump. I'm sure I could read the methods but I rarely get to read NYT due to paywall.

[-] EatATaco@lemm.ee 7 points 6 months ago

The article makes a pretty convincing argument that the right wing spin sphere is already out in full force trying to downplay the debates.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 18 points 6 months ago

Does anyone think auto cut off of the mic is warranted? "You have 60 seconds and then the mic cuts off".

[-] ccunning@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago

Absolutely. Did you see the last Biden Trump debate?

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

“Aw just shut up, man”

[-] teejay@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

Have you watched any of the presidential debates in the last decade or two? How is this even a question at this point?

I won't watch any more debates until they do this.

[-] HopeOfTheGunblade@kbin.social 7 points 6 months ago

That was one of the conditions of these debates.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 16 points 6 months ago

I am really hoping a solid heat wave this summer takes down the presidential ticket.

[-] unreasonabro@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

Good god. Both of them? What a glorious thought... but what a shitshow that would follow.

[-] FuryMaker@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago

As much as I want to watch him fail in a debate, I feel like the MAGA group will double down, and just love him even more.

[-] neclimdul@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago

It's not the maga group Biden needs to convince. Doubling down when they're already all in doesn't mean much.

He's trying to win an election so it's the various "I don't want to vote for Biden so I'll vote for trump or not vote" in swing states people he needs to be moving. To those people, Trump trying to go on an unhinged Twitter tirade at a debate could be persuasive. At least that's what a lot of Dems, and according to this GOP, think is going to happen.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago

Aren't they wearing diapers in solidarity with Ronald McDonald?

[-] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

Doesnt really matter how bad he gets, his magats are still gonna worship him

[-] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

Don’t forget ‘anyplace’ too!

[-] prowess2956@kbin.social 9 points 6 months ago

See you on the surface of the Sun 😎

[-] PlasticExistence@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

I wonder if there's beer on the Sun...

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Jallu@sopuli.xyz 8 points 6 months ago

404 Not Found

nginx/1.24.0

🥺

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 17 May 2024
398 points (96.7% liked)

politics

19104 readers
1138 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS