She is just running circles around media establishments. Speaker Greene is going to be wild. Or at least that's what she's after. Every House GOPer is going to need a pivot and she will be that for them.
ZombiFrancis
I get it. I had meant 'modern' more than anything and 'english' was the convenient assumption.
I was trying note along the idea of how we only know Spartan history from Athenian accounts of Sparta, not Spartans. If all we had was specifically a christian interpretation of the texts then yeah, conclusions can be as varied as the reader. If we interpret the bible through contemporary historical observations the importance of the lessons and stories of the bible are provided context.
The christian traditions around the bible and the historical context through which the bible was written and interpreted are very different.
But that isn't to undermine or remove the fact that there is a long tradition of interpreting these passages as to include masturbation. (If not the concept of sodomy at large.) But to me that's likewise as understandably contexualized.
You can keep Moore (say you don't know) and Freyja (don't give her the scroll) alive in the DLC, and Hewg and Rodericka 'survive' the base game.
Because a straight reading of the part imo does make it about wasting seed insted of procreating and the interpretations I can find go with that interpretation.
History? Mesopotamian history? It wouldn't be an individual's personal reaction to one of the english translations of the text.
There's a great deal of information, especially from greek and persian sources that describe the rules and laws of the region during biblical times. Like the septanguit was a major greek translation that entered judean laws and customs to greek analysis.
And then we have early roman history that conquered the region and documented the rules of local religions/cults.
Again, it isn't derived from a vibe check of plain text like when SCOTUS overturns human rights.
Panel 3: OceanGate
You fantasize about Hitler winning the war in enough detail enough times...
Thanks, though it is a username I have used variously for probably 20+ years.
I assume it is based on data of people being admitted to hospitals, as titled. So my guess is this is more about how the medical system breaks the data down, and they selected for the highest disparities of reported sex.
One of the more interesting polls out of this was whether voters were casting in support of or against a candidate.
86% of Mamdani voters were voting out of support of their candidate.
Half of Cuomo voters were voting against another candidate. (Mamdani.)
Voting against a candidate is a losing strategy.
It's based on users sending in reports, and positive news for the left or news critical of Israel unleashes an army of rules lawyers.
Meanwhile pundits on CNN is calling this a 'warning lesson'. Anderson Cooper and crowd fear mongering even through victory.
Schumer has zero control over his party when even the party whip pledges to defect. But he apparently refused to vote for the Democratic candidate for NYC mayor, so this is entirely expected and precedented.