ccunning

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] ccunning@lemmy.world -4 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I agree with your point; nothing in the comment I responded to made anything close to or even alluded to your point.

Just look at their “clarifying” response to my comment.

[–] ccunning@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

They didn’t ban me; I banned them…

[–] ccunning@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Not OP - just pointing out more…curiosities…I found in the pan. Also, I think it’s bucatini and maybe some sort of cheese sauce 🥴

[–] ccunning@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Corn, ketchup, and kidney beans?!

[–] ccunning@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago

…to impress Jodie Foster.

[–] ccunning@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Excuse me sir; this is /c/mildlyinfuriating not /c/infuriatingsolutions

[–] ccunning@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Yeah - I didn’t mean to imply all banks were doing this now. Just my credit union in particular.

[–] ccunning@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I would love to just use my debit card instead but I don’t get the same level of protection nor cash back on spending from my debit card.

[–] ccunning@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yes. Exact same question.

I do not have a criminal mind…

 

It was one of the tools that allowed me to maintain healthy credit card usage habits. In my idle time when messing around on my phone I’d gotten into the habit of just transferring money from my checking account to my credit card, often in excess of my actual balance, so as to cover “pending” purchases.

Not only will my bank no longer let me do that, just to twist the knife a bit, they will let me make multiple payments totaling the pending total due so long as no individual payment exceeds my actual balance.

So it’s not that they can no longer handle negative balances on the card, it’s just that they’ve half-ass made the interface disallow it.

[–] ccunning@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

So where does the clampdown on anti-genocide speech land wrt this?

 

It has been the sensible order of choosing the source account then choosing the destination account. Now they’ve switched it to where you have to first choose the destination account then choose the source account.

I understand this shouldn’t be a big deal but my brain just absolutely rejects it and even knowing full well they’ve made the change on several occasions I’ve moved money the wrong way. Sometimes without even realizing it for days.

I don’t think this is simply a muscle memory thing that I’ll eventually get used to; I feel like it’s fundamentally nonsensical and I’m curious if it’s just me. Or am I just being a stubborn old man stuck in his ways?

 

Connection: Phnom Penh is the capital of Cambodia

 

As I understand it, user reports go to the community, the community’s instance, as well as the user’s instance if the user is from a separate instance.

My concern is if a user is breaking instance rules across multiple communities it might not rise to a level to catch the attention of instance admins. If my understanding (^) is correct I imagine there is an absolute flood of reports at the instance level making the correlation of reports against a particular user hard to single out.

Is my understanding wrong? Or maybe reports are automatically correlated? Or failing that is there a way to report a user directly to instance admins?

view more: next ›