Surprising there’s no one representing Apple on this list.
Yes - the infamous U.S. constitutional system of checks and checks; or was it balances and balances? I can never remember 🤔
“Taking tax dollars from billionaires to fund pursuit of CSAM and child sex trafficking is socialism”
So far Trump’s politicized DOJ has struggled to get indictments let alone convictions.
Senior Justice Department officials have repeatedly said there are no plans to follow the path normally taken in such situations and pursue an investigation into whether Mr. Ross, who fired multiple shots at Ms. Good, had used excessive force.
“Senior Justice Department officials unable to clear Ross’ name”
I don’t see how it would be different in that regard than 69ing which I’ve always enjoyed giving and receiving of
Are you saying you’d be more focused on giving yourself pleasure than romantic partner?
This makes no sense to me; please explain
This is why all these departments and agencies have policies. So they can get convictions. The Trump admin thinks they can just change a policy (e.g. ICE’s new policy to disregard the 4th amendment) and that changes the law. In reality it’s just going to waste a lot of time in court and put folks (ON bOtH sIDEs) in danger.
It isn’t legal. And they haven’t changed the law. It’s just now their policy to ignore the law.
Right now they’re trying to “shock and awe” everyone into submission and compliance before the law catches up with them.
Never tried nitro coffee before, but the milk in a latte adds sweetness that I like but is nothing like the level of sweetness as a caramel macchiato.
Maybe it’s similar?
No they didn’t…
…ask any jury…