204
submitted 7 months ago by Xatolos@reddthat.com to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] frazw@lemmy.world 134 points 7 months ago

Wow, that's great!! So I guess all the chemicals coming out of the coal, oil and gas fired power plants will be stopped then.

CO2, NOx, particulates all are chemicals and are all intentionally released during combustion.

[-] PlasterAnalyst@kbin.social 60 points 7 months ago

Me: breathing in oxygen and exhaling CO2

Cops: you're under arrest.

[-] frazw@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago

That's the least of your worries - no more farting!!!

[-] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago

You can't tell me what to do!

sharts

🫠

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Fuck can I at least rust?

[-] snooggums@midwest.social 9 points 7 months ago
[-] frazw@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago

No more rolling coal in TN

[-] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

drops charcoal briquette down hill

[-] bhmnscmm@lemmy.world 67 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

The bill forbids "intentional injection, release, or dispersion" of chemicals into the air.

Instead it broadly prohibits "affecting temperature, weather, or the intensity of the sunlight".

This bill is obviously based in ignorance, but from an envirinmental/pollution standpoint this seems like a good thing. It's not their intention, but it sounds like it would protect the atmosphere from potential real polluters.

Edit: based in ignorance in the sense that some people supported the bill to ban "chem trails" (an ignorant position). Not in the sense that weather manipulation isn't real.

[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 61 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Suddenly every wood burning residential fireplace is illegal.

Wood smoke can obscure intensity of sunlight temporarily, increases temperature as a consequence of combustion, and small particulate matter like smoke particles are what makes rain possible, which would be weather effects

[-] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 14 points 7 months ago

Hell, breathing is illegal.

[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

"Here's a ticket for breathing out in violation of Tennessee law"

"What?!"

"Oh so you're a repeat offender are you? Here's a second ticket. You wanna try for three?"

[-] meco03211@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

Oh we got a smart-ass over here trying to hold her breath? Well missy you should have thought about that before getting pregnant. Now we've got you for attempted murder!

[-] fishos@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Um, no it's not. There are legit weather manipulating programs. Not the conspiracy chem trails bs, but legit "weather manipulation isn't illegal, so private companies have started getting into it for creating snow on mountains or clearing the sky before a concert" things. It made the news awhile back when a, I believe, California company, started doing it.

Beijing did it before the Olympics. It wasn't a secret by any means.

As it stands now, there is very little regulation in that area if the things you are spraying aren't already considered toxic substances. But should just anyone be able to manipulate the weather? Won't that cause more widespread issues? Maybe, maybe not. But should we leave that decision in the hands of corporations?

ETA: If you want to know more, start by looking up "cloud seeding". You'll see we've been openly testing it for decades. Source: Google

[-] bhmnscmm@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago

Just because people/corporations can use those legitimate weather manipulation tools, should they be allowed to?

I don't think they should. That's why I'm saying this bill seems like an unintentionally good thing.

I'm confused by your comment. I think we agree there should be regulation on the manipulation you described?

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

The article states that this bill bans cloud seeding

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 43 points 7 months ago

In a joking response, John Ray Clemmons, a Democrat from Nashville, introduced an amendment that would protect fictional beasts. "This amendment would make sure that we are protecting yetis, or Sasquatch or Bigfoot, from whatever this conspiracy is that we're passing in this legislation," he said during debate.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 40 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I love how they think that both chemtrails are real and that the evil secret cabal will care about their little law.

These people don't have any internal consistency in their mad conspiracy theories.

[-] SeaJ@lemm.ee 39 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Instead it broadly prohibits "affecting temperature, weather, or the intensity of the sunlight".

Let's go after companies emitting CO2, CO, SO2, etc. TN is going to have to go green real quick.

I'm guessing this is targeted at the geoengineering idea of emitting sulfur dioxide alternatives to bring down local temperatures but it is written in a way that prohibits CO2 emission. Good job, Republicans. You just passed the greenest bill in the country.

[-] WordBox@lemmy.world 26 points 7 months ago

So they don't crop dust in Tennessee then?

[-] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

'Silent but deadly' is a misdemeanor.

[-] Diotima@ttrpg.network 26 points 7 months ago

Hmm. Can we uno reverse this to shut down companies who are egregious polluters? Please say we can.

[-] ThrowawaySobriquet@lemmy.world 15 points 7 months ago

Right? My first thought was "how the fuck did Eastman let this one slip through?"

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 23 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Frivolous lawsuits over steam in the air are incoming...

But also: RIP crop dusters in TN.

[-] rtxn@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago

RIP to the single most effective form of mosquito population control.

[-] ettyblatant@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

This is what I thought of immediately. Crop dusters, how about flame retardant? Can you not put fires out from the air in Tennessee?

[-] stanleytweedle@lemmy.world 16 points 7 months ago

Has anyone tried passing a bill to make Tennessee have lunar gravity on weekends and holidays? I might think about vacationing there.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 15 points 7 months ago

How exactly do they plan to enforce it?

[-] snooggums@midwest.social 22 points 7 months ago
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago

Can they even arbitrarily enforce it? What are they going to do, stop a passenger jet in mid-air?

[-] snooggums@midwest.social 6 points 7 months ago

The bill says the act needs to be intentional, so they pick and choose whose pollution is intended to manipulate the weather. They could choose a particular airline and fine them, with jurisdiction depending on whether the airline operates out of an airport in Tennessee.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago

Sounds like a great way to destroy Tennessee's economy.

[-] Zerlyna@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

This is just one of many insanities here. I moved back here four years ago and it not the same place I left in 2008. It’s batshit crazy. But I’m stuck here now until my dad dies. :(

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

I feel that way about moving back to Indiana.

[-] harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 7 months ago

Would it be rude to say we hope he dies soon? For your sake.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Cosmicomical@lemmy.world 14 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Wait until they find out the air you expel when breathing is made of chemicals and you're injecting them in the athmosphere.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago

Imagine being the poor bastard DA asked to bring this case. FFS may as well make leprechauns illegal. Tennessee, man. Come on.

[-] mechoman444@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

O! So we don't have to do anything: said every airline ever.

[-] evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Something is fishy, if you look up the bills that supposedly did this, they don't say anything about this topic.

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 4; Title 5; Title 6; Title 7; Title 8; Title 39; Title 42; Title 43; Title 44; Title 55; Title 58; Title 59; Title 60; Title 65; Title 68 and Title 69, relative to environmental protection. Environmental Preservation - As introduced, decreases, from 180 days to 150 days, the time that the air pollution control board can have more than one vacancy after an appointing authority of the board receives sufficient information to fill the appropriate vacancy before the board is required to report to the government operations committees. - Amends TCA Title 4; Title 5; Title 6; Title 7; Title 8; Title 39; Title 42; Title 43; Title 44; Title 55; Title 58; Title 59; Title 60; Title 65; Title 68 and Title 69.

Edit: looks like I missed the amendment in the mobile version of the site. What's funny is by the wording of the amendment, it's perfectly legal to use airplanes to disperse mind control chemicals, lol. They are only banning efforts to combat climate change.

AMENDMENT #1 rewrites the bill to prohibit the intentional injection, release, or dispersion, by any means, of chemicals, chemical compounds, substances, or apparatus within the borders of this state into the atmosphere with the express purpose of affecting temperature, weather, or the intensity of the sunlight.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 6 points 7 months ago

So much for crop dusting in Tennessee!!

[-] MechanicalJester@lemm.ee 4 points 7 months ago

Hope they never need to put out fires using planes dropping dihydrogen monoxide

[-] sirico@feddit.uk 1 points 7 months ago

No muh F250

[-] PugJesus@kbin.social 1 points 7 months ago
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2024
204 points (97.7% liked)

News

23305 readers
3618 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS