502
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by Breezy@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Here is a link to another post with an article.

https://lemmy.world/post/13553444

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 77 points 3 months ago

Woof... Found a map of the area, and yeah, you can route around the collapse, but the next closest crossing is a ways away...

[-] Breezy@lemmy.world 44 points 3 months ago

Oof.... the traffic is gonna be hellish there for the foreseeable future.

[-] VieuxQueb@lemmy.ca 20 points 3 months ago

Now imagine shipping traffic! Lots of deliveries not happening this week!

[-] limelight79@lemm.ee 14 points 3 months ago

And the tunnels (I-895 and I-95) forbid things like propane, so if you have some of that, you're off to the west side of the Baltimore Beltway, which is already extremely busy. Good luck with that!

(Relatively local person here who travels around Baltimore frequently. I've used the bridge that collapsed on several occasions to avoid the tunnels while carrying propane.)

[-] Lemjukes@lemm.ee 9 points 3 months ago

Except if you’re carrying HAZMATS it’s even worse, they’re not allowed in either of the tunnel crossings, so all that traffic has to reroute aaaaaaall the way off your map via the western half of 695.

[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 66 points 3 months ago

Holy fuck! It took the whole thing down! That shipping company is going to be sued into oblivion

[-] Breezy@lemmy.world 75 points 3 months ago

There were people on it! Not a whole lot of cars since it happened a couple hours ago. But there were around 50 people working on it at the time. Its so devastating.

[-] jballs@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 months ago

That's insane. I heard about this on NPR this morning, but I didn't picture the bridge being so big. Glad it was early when there weren't hundreds more people on it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago

Will probably take a couple of insurance companies down too!

[-] Ookami38@sh.itjust.works 30 points 3 months ago

At least something good will come of it then

[-] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 19 points 3 months ago

I'm thinking there will be many more parties to that lawsuit... Foremost insurers. And their re-insurers.

However right now it looks like this ship suffered a mechanical failure, so if I had a business in ship building/maintenance you bet I'd be calling everyone in the company to get confirmation that that ship was not on our customer list. And if it was I'd already be in an all-hands meeting with engineering and legal.

If I was in charge of whichever government entity is in charge of maritime traffic, I'd be discretely asking why the fuck boats big enough to bring a bridge down by slowly booping into it were allowed to be boating under the bridge. I would refute responsibility of course... but some maritime traffic rule changes might happen down the line.

[-] wolfpack86@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago

To your last comment, ships never just boop. It smothers.

Let's say 100k tons for a ship, and make it long tons to make it an even 100,000,000kg. This ship was moving roughly 4m/s... Thus the kinetic energy was somewhere around 800 MJ. A stick of dynamite is about 1MJ.

I'm pretty sure 800 sticks of dynamite could've fucked that support up pretty good, too, bringing down the bridge deck.

It's more like either you give up on bridges or give up on ships if you are concerned about the two coexisting and breaking stuff in a low speed collision.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 65 points 3 months ago

Lights on boat began to flicker before incident, suggesting some sort of power failure. Steering a full size car without power steering is possible, but spoiler, steering a huge container ship ain't.

Someone commented that exhaust increased noticably as well, possibly because pilot put ship in reverse after losing power (with prop walk veering the ship into the support).

All just people talking on the Internet at present, but "asleep at the wheel" isn't necessarily what happened.

[-] CraigeryTheKid@lemm.ee 15 points 3 months ago

Given how "easily" the bridge fell... Why aren't ships that size required to 100% be escorted by tugs???

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 21 points 3 months ago

At the risk of sounding too Clarke and Dawe, it is very rare that a ship loses power and control, and somewhere it could hit something important, and hits that thing, and the thing is apparently so fragile that it just falls to pieces. It's been there for 46 years, and the Port of Baltimore currently sees an average of 53 ships in and out per month, so about 3.5 big ships under the bridge per day. That's a lot of passages over the years without incident.

[-] tal@lemmy.today 22 points 3 months ago

and the thing is apparently so fragile that it just falls to pieces.

I mean, it just got hit with a hundred thousand ton hammer. That'll do a pretty good number on most structures, I imagine.

[-] Liz@midwest.social 7 points 3 months ago

For a structure that normally has these ships pass under it every day, it sure as hell should have had bollards to protect the piers against such an impact.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] CraigeryTheKid@lemm.ee 11 points 3 months ago

no, this is you speaking my language. we do 'risk assessments' and yeah I guess it's a case of severity*likelihood, where risk is never zero.

but, no matter what, when the risks 'line up' into a failure mode, holy shit is that failure catastrophic. crazy terrible regardless.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Krauerking@lemy.lol 15 points 3 months ago

Cause then we would have to hire more people to tug all those ships in and it would be less efficient.

Not very profit margin of you to suggest that.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] asret@lemmy.zip 12 points 3 months ago

Politics.

"More tug jobs? Not on my watch!"

[-] BleatingZombie@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

And money.

"Why do I need to pay for your safety"

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] rustyfish@lemmy.world 57 points 3 months ago

Roughly 20 people are still missing. Water is almost 0 degrees. I think this will be the death toll.

I also wonder how TF this happened.

[-] iAmTheTot@kbin.social 38 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The temperature in the river was about 47 degrees Fahrenheit (8 degrees Celsius) in the early hours of Tuesday, according to a buoy that collects data for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

Edited to add:
Replies seem to think that I think 8°C water isn't cold or dangerous. I don't think that.

[-] Fermion@mander.xyz 11 points 3 months ago

https://westpacmarine.com/samples/hypothermia_chart.php

Loss of consciousness is expected to occur within 30-60 minutes and death is expected within 1-3 hours at those water temps. I would assume none of the victims were wearing personal flotation devices, so rescue of anyone else seems highly unlikely.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Zink@programming.dev 10 points 3 months ago

I’ll wear a t-shirt outside for 10 minutes when it’s 47 degrees outside. But 47 is a whole new level of cold when it’s water.

I have a little pond in the yard, so I occasionally have to reach in there throughout the year. Right now it’s close to that 47F mark, and it’s like past “this is cold” to “this hurts!”

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Water temp of 47 can be lethal very quickly.

Water cools the body about 25 times faster than air of the same temp. A diver in 70-degree water may go blue in the lips even with a wetsuit. 47 degrees will have your body going numb super quickly. Then you lose dexterity and start having muscle cramps all over. You lose the ability to swim away or even tread water.

It's bad.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] graycube@kbin.social 44 points 3 months ago

It is likely to disrupt shipping in a major US port. This will have repercussions throughout the economy until the port is fully reopened.

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 8 points 3 months ago

That bridge was also part of I-95, a major northeastern transit corridor. That will also be majorly impacted.

[-] tal@lemmy.today 8 points 3 months ago

https://www.google.com/maps/dir/Atlanta,+Georgia/Bangor,+maine/@39.22529,-76.645258,11z/data=!4m8!4m7!1m2!1m1!1s0x88f5045d6993098d:0x66fede2f990b630b!1m2!1m1!1s0x4cae4b46101129bd:0x4d0918b0a7af7677!3e0

It looks like long-distance traffic would normally take the remaining bridge over I-895 rather than over I-695, though I suppose it'll be more congested now due to more traffic having to pass over it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Veedem@lemmy.world 28 points 3 months ago

Holy crap! That went down way more quickly than I expected.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] JonsJava@lemmy.world 28 points 3 months ago

Usually, this would be deleted for not being a news article.

OP, please link to the link below, and I'll let it stay.

https://lemmy.world/post/13553444

[-] Breezy@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago

Im sorry, i wasnt aware of that rule. I just wasnt seeing a video up on here at the time so i grabbed one off the live stream to post for others to see. I posted the link you gave in the description instead of the main url so people can still quickly pull it up. If theres a problem still ill do what i can to change it, or you can go ahead and delete this post since there are now more videos and such up online.

[-] JonsJava@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago

Nope. You did great. Our rules state that a post must contain a link to an article. Keeping the video as primary, and adding a link as the comment suffices. We usually don't give the warning, but I felt that your post added good context for the news surrounding the breaking news.

[-] LordOfTheChia@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago

You guys (mods) are doing a helluva good job. A very civil request for the OP to correct the slight omission, encouragement and polite follow up, didn't just silently delete the post.

Kudos!

[-] Hubi@feddit.de 15 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I feel like the whole thing shouldn't have come down as easy as it did...

Edit: Nevermind, I didn't realize how large this ship actually is.

[-] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 49 points 3 months ago

I don't think integrity after getting a support annihilated by a massive ship is a reasonable design objective. You'd need way more supports and structure, at least doubling the weight and cost of the structure, I'd guess maybe 4x. As far as stress tests go, getting one of your two supports knocked out is an extremely stressing condition.

[-] Monument@lemmy.sdf.org 33 points 3 months ago

I learned recently that in engineering there’s a saying that anyone can build a bridge that will stand, but only an engineer can build a bridge that barely stands.

Which seems dark, but bridges are built on budgets while adhering to aesthetic, material, and site/traffic (on, under, and sometimes over) requirements.

And besides, that ship was between 210 to 257 million pounds, traveling at whatever speed it was going. I’m not a physicist, but I recon that’s enough force to knock down a bridge. (As evidenced.)

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 40 points 3 months ago

i feel like giant ships shouldn't be hitting the supports of a bridge

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 19 points 3 months ago

if you ever made a bridge out of toothpicks in school, the lesson is how much force it can hold straight up and down. Something super heavy whacking at its side while also dead on nailing one of the major support structures.... yeah thing crumbled like toothpicks

load more comments (15 replies)
[-] dog_@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

Welcome to Baltimore (bawlmore, for the locals). A local here, it's so devastating.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2024
502 points (99.6% liked)

News

21718 readers
3545 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS