[-] wolfpack86@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Almost like they could be represented in the house or the Senate, right

[-] wolfpack86@lemmy.world 25 points 6 days ago

I'm not an antivaxxer, but I do believe in informed consent. So:

No.

[-] wolfpack86@lemmy.world 57 points 2 months ago

This is the product of clinics being owned by corporations chasing a specific return, and not being owned by a local group of physicians who actually want to care for people.

Shop local applies.

[-] wolfpack86@lemmy.world 38 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

"part of the fabric" not "the fabric"

I'm an ally, but at the end of the day let's not over conflate statements. It doesn't serve anyone a favor.

Over stating gives poor intentioned people room and also means that supporters relent.

"The fabric" should never apply to any group tbh.

[-] wolfpack86@lemmy.world 58 points 7 months ago

This is such a weird exemption. It's so narrow that these places will have to raise their wages by default anyway.

Nothing will stop their employees from just leaving to take a job at McDonald's for $20/hr instead of the $15 or whatever panera wants to pay.

[-] wolfpack86@lemmy.world 53 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I thought this was some sort of weeks old story being posted....

But is the gun that he's selling the same gun he "totally did not buy, we swear"

https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2023/09/25/donald-trump-gun-glock/70965018007/

Edit: perhaps not https://www.meidastouch.com/news/exclusive-trump-gun-auctioned-off-at-mar-a-lago-likely-violation-of-indictment-release

[-] wolfpack86@lemmy.world 95 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Sweden

Source country: Denmark

[-] wolfpack86@lemmy.world 35 points 11 months ago

Almost like they're concentrating them in some sort of encampment

[-] wolfpack86@lemmy.world 37 points 11 months ago

I'm generally pro legalization of drugs, but will say this is likely to be much more effective than the war on drugs ever was.

You don't outlaw possession, just the sales age. You'll see significantly fewer new starters as time goes because after 20 years 40 year olds that can buy wont be bothered to support fresh 18 year olds looking to start a new habit or whatever. The ones that really want to start can buy from abroad without any form of punishment.

I think it's different because I don't think anyone turns to their first cigarette looking to try and attain some new feeling. It's usually one of those things like... My friends were so I grabbed one from them and blah blah.

I would say I'm for the progressive increase in age, and I wrestle with my own hypocrisy seeing that I support legalizing other drugs. But maybe that's rooted in the basis that I've never had a pothead or dude on shrooms negatively impact me. Cigarettes however--littered everywhere, get smoke in your face, etc

304
Rudy is strapped for cash (edition.cnn.com)

If only he knew a competent lawyer.

[-] wolfpack86@lemmy.world 52 points 1 year ago

I think you are under interpreting. The road is absolutely too small for two cars, and it's showing that bikes have priority on that part of the road. If two cars are in the center car lane, they must wait for the bike lanes to be clear to pass each other, it's not first come, first served as a road with no bike lanes would be.

[-] wolfpack86@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago

I was hanging with a girl that was pretty chill. We had hung a few times over the few months we had met, and had a nice platonic thing going.

She came over and we started to watch some documentary, and in it, there was an abusive man of African descent. She straight up said, "I think there's something genetic with them that causes them to have a short temper and behave like that".

Yeah, we never hung out again.

[-] wolfpack86@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago

Great, now do the phone browser

view more: next ›

wolfpack86

joined 1 year ago