533
submitted 10 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

The world’s top chess federation has ruled that transgender women cannot compete in its official events for females until an assessment of gender change is made by its officials.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] jet@hackertalks.com 219 points 10 months ago

Silly question, why does chess, a mental activity, need gendered leagues?

[-] jsveiga@sh.itjust.works 123 points 10 months ago

Chess at pro level is brutal. One can get mentally mauled if the adversary has a superior, trained for cruel psychological warfare, mind.

Men just don't stand a chance.

[-] _wintermute@lemmy.world 71 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Because the whole idea of gendered leagues in games that ultimately don't matter at all is about segregation and control, not physiology.

Bring on the down votes from the "but muh sports 'tegridy!" clowns.

Edit: some of yall need a class on statistics lol

[-] bhmnscmm@lemmy.world 29 points 10 months ago

I don't really follow. Do you mean only non/minimally physical competitions or all competitive sports/games/activities?

For things like chess, fishing, and spelling bees gender segregation doesn't make sense. But for things like martial arts or weight lifting I think it makes sense.

It at least makes sense if the goal is competition between roughly similar groups of participants, and not just a single open class dominated by a particular physiology.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] flossdaily@lemmy.world 60 points 10 months ago

In girl chess the pieces are pink.

[-] maino82@lemmy.ca 34 points 10 months ago

All of the pieces. On both sides of the board. Mentally it's much more taxing keeping track of which pieces are yours. We guys have it really easy with the whole black/white pieces.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] aberrate_junior_beatnik@midwest.social 37 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

shaun did an excellent video on exactly this. TL;DW: stereotype threat & harassment.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 35 points 10 months ago

Have you met chess bros?

I can see why women would want their own league.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Deestan@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago

It doesn't in principle, and it's not really either.

There is the main league, which is open for everyone, and an extra league for women only to offset the male dominance of the main league.

Why they feel the need to exclude trans women from that I have no idea. Even many of the physical sports allow trans women under certain conditions and only to prevent any unfair advantage due to increased muscle growth during puberty.

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] Zapdrive@lemmy.world 107 points 10 months ago

Lol, literally the only game where physical size, bone density, lung capacity and muscle strength does not matter is keeping men and women separate! Haha... In chess there should be no separate category for women, unless.... Unless.... Unless we believe that women are less smarter than men.

[-] UlrikHD@programming.dev 85 points 10 months ago

Chess got an open class and a female class. The latter is there to provide a safer environment for girls and hopefully encourage more to try out the sport.

load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (33 replies)
[-] Silverseren@kbin.social 75 points 10 months ago

And they also made it so trans men have to give up any women's titles they've earned. So, they simultaneously think trans men are men, but trans women are not women.

If anything, based on the past comments of the head of the organization, they have a position that's generally "women are dumber than men and we want to make decisions that align with that ethos always".

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 32 points 10 months ago

I've stopped being surprised by chess dorks after it came out that America's Champion, Bobby Fischer, our Hope Against The Commie Gameplaying Menace was literally a neo-Nazi and not subtle about it.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] fubo@lemmy.world 69 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

To be clear, the head of FIDE is this guy with close ties to the Russian fascist state.

[-] Kara@kbin.social 19 points 10 months ago

And the CEO is Emil Sutovsky, who recently made a twitter poll, basically asking, let's be honest, does anyone actually care to watch this women's tournament? When he never made a similar poll for any other tournament.
The chess world really needs to outgrow the sexist and transphobic FIDE

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] SuddenDownpour@lemmy.world 66 points 10 months ago

None of y'all are getting it. Trans women have an unfair advantage in chess because they can turn the king into another queen.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Almostarctic@lemmy.world 64 points 10 months ago

I'm still wondering why there is even gender based play in Chess.

[-] Cqrd@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 10 months ago

I’ve always heard that it’s to encourage visibility of women players and encourage women to take up the game, but this ban goes against that idea and just makes it sound like women aren’t as good at the game. Just like ol’ Bobby would want, I guess.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] aluminiumsandworm@kbin.social 50 points 10 months ago

this makes sense because cis women have such small bones they can't reach past the centre board, giving most trans women and tall cis women an inherent advantage. /s

what the fuck chess this is just blatant transphobia

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.world 44 points 10 months ago

This is such a stupid argument, while you might be able to make the argument about sexual dimorphism in physical sports there's literally no good reason why a woman shouldn't be allowed to play chess against a man, or play chess against another woman if they are trans.

Chess is a game based on intelligence and strategy, it's not based on strength. It seems that this decision was made primarily on the basis of sexism, either because they think that chess is ""manly"" or because they think that men are smarter than women or that women are stupid. Either way not logical, purely sexist.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Wahots@pawb.social 43 points 10 months ago

Ugh, why do they feel the need to even write these rules in the first place? I can almost guarantee you there's like, five trans people who are even registered to play chess. Why go to so much effort to block such a fraction of a percent of people anyways?

Whenever I read articles like these, I substitute "trans" for a different minority, such as a racial or ethnic minority, and it really puts it in perspective.

I remember when Utah made a huge deal about it in women's sports. And someone like the Utah governor was against it, saying he'd never seen so much hate around something so little. He told his colleagues that in the entire state, only four trans youth were even playing registered sports, and most were JV, not even going to competitions. It's sad to see people so stoked by hate for something so...mundane. :/

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago

The same people claiming transwomen would ruin women's sports were celebrating when the U.S. women's team lost the World Cup.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Stinkywinks@lemmy.world 41 points 10 months ago

Why are men and woman separated in chess??

[-] lunaticneko@lemmy.ml 20 points 10 months ago

Traditionally chess has been a men's game, and female adoption is limited. The creation of an exclusive women's division is to generate a pathway to success for women, even if it's known to have a lower ceiling compared to men. Basically, it is to foster the game in females.

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] Shanedino@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Men and women aren't separated, at least not usually. Its a woman's category and an open (everyone) category. Is almost completely opposite of sexist, gives women more opportunities to succeed.

Edit: link to a larger discussion on this topic

https://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/why-are-there-only-few-female-chess-players-at-the-top-level

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 37 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Clarifications and comments (some pre emptive)

Chess has a women's category to boost participation and spotlight female players.

Women can and do compete in the open category, which allows men and women. However, currently the highest rated women perform under the super closed "Super GM" level, so they participate in the tournaments that are less prestigious but fitting their rating. Male players like IM Eric Rosen also participate in such tournaments.

The best female player in history , Judit Polgar was 8th best in the world when taking both genders into account. There's nothing stopping women from reaching the elite level in open chess. She even participated in the candidates tournament which decides who gets to play against the world champion for the world champion title. Unfortunately she didn't perform too well, but it's not because of her gender, she was basically beaten 2-1 (plus draws) by a male competitor, just like the other contestants in the round she was eliminated.

At her peak she had 2735 Elo points, making her 55th highest rated person in the history of organized chess. This is higher than one of the actual challengers to the crown, Nigel short.

Regarding the rulings:

  1. No one is going to pretend to be a woman, in order to convert the person's identity with fide, they are required to have government issued paperwork saying they have transitioned. It's not worth it.

  2. it's funny that male to female transgender people are not regarded as women by this ruling, hence cannot participate in women's events, but female to male transgender people also forfeit their women's titles as they are not seen as women either. (To be fair, they can convert them to open titles, and get them back if they detransition officially)

So according to FIDE, transitioning from a man to a woman doesn't make you a woman, you are considered a man, but also, transitioning from a woman to a man makes you a man, so you are also not considered a woman.

Seems paradoxical. You'd think they'd pick one and stick to it.

Also: chess does have physical advantages, but they seem to be reletive and not competitive. Most high level players have some sports regimen as it helps increase cardiovascular efficiency, but size of competitor doesn't seem to matter as seen by David Bronstein and Mikhail Tal. Ian Nepomniatchschi intentionally lost weight for the world championship, and his ratings grew as a result.

Remember that whales are not necessarily more clever than humans even though their brains are huge in comparison.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] chk232@lemmy.world 34 points 10 months ago

I don't think it's a issue in chess. Unless they have to run 100m while holding the chess board.

[-] starlinguk@kbin.social 30 points 10 months ago

They consider trans women men, and men are smarter than women. That's what it implies anyway.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Hairyblue@kbin.social 33 points 10 months ago

What? Is this real? Are the men and women not competing together? It is not a physical competition. Why the separation?

[-] wwaxen@lemmy.world 39 points 10 months ago

Currently, the top women don't come close to the top men. Considering how few female chess players are in comparison, it's not a surprise.

Having a women's league means you can have chess news about women's tournaments and champs and give them some visibility.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] PunnyName@lemmy.world 32 points 10 months ago

The reason there's a women's league in the first place is so they don't get harassed by the men (ostensibly).

So while on the surface, a gendered League is stupid, there are real world reasons for the separation.

This decision might / maybe / could be an extension of that reasoning. But very likely it's not, and it's just more bullshit anti trans policy.

[-] donuts@kbin.social 16 points 10 months ago

The best way to prevent harassment is not bigoted segregation by gender, but in fact punishing or banning people who harass others.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] sturmblast@lemmy.world 31 points 10 months ago

well this just doesn't even make any fucking sense at all

[-] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 27 points 10 months ago

Why is chess even seperated by gender? Its a completely non physical.

[-] Smk@lemmy.ca 16 points 10 months ago

The environment around men favors them to be stronger than women. If there were no women's category, there would only be men playing chess and very very few women and that would sucks.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Thedogspaw@midwest.social 27 points 10 months ago

This isn't like running or something where men have a significant advantage physically over women just make it mixed gender and be done with it people can claim whatever gender they want and chess can avoid getting into a politically charged firestorm

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world 27 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Plenty of enlightened gents hitting the thread here to rubbish the need for a women's category whilst simultaneously demonstrating the need for a women's category

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 10 months ago

Today we learned that bigots think trans women have a biological advantage at being smarter and more logical than cis women.

Last month we learned that bigots think trans women are hotter than cis women.

Starting to think bigots don't think clearly.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
533 points (95.2% liked)

World News

37289 readers
1778 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS