jet

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] jet@hackertalks.com 5 points 1 day ago

Rewording the title

Intermittent fasting just as good as typical weight loss diets!

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)
[–] jet@hackertalks.com 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I have not used the bags, im lucky with access to a dry sauna... but heating a room in a house to 80c seems like a really bad thing to do

 

William N Stape wrote for Star Trek TNG and DS9. He has strong views on what Star Trek was and is. What is different, from a writers persoective, between bew Trek and the trek that was actualky good?

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I could help with reports and the like on a best effort basis.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

drastically changing the heat and or humidity in your house is going to be a bad experience. You're much better off getting a cheap sauna bag, and using that to heat up. Just your body. Typical sauna temperatures are between 70° c and 90° c.

In a traditional sauna I've melted water bottles and glasses, most things in a kitchen are not designed to get so hot.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 3 points 3 days ago

Space exploration

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 5 points 3 days ago

I think it's often a short hand to get people to slow down and pay attention. Be careful! Take it slow, no rush.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 3 points 3 days ago

Over a billion users, and very popular in old eastern bloc countries already.

Yes central control, and controlled by people who don't have the most robust encryption or opsec (CEO house arrest in France for example)... But over time they have demonstrated they don't care too much about most low level crimes.

So it's in the sweet spot of good enough and convenient but not great and not perfect

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Nice keyboard

Xmonad!

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 1 points 4 days ago

I dislike 'source available' - We only have to look at new pipe and pipe pipe to see why... New pipe doesn't agree with sponsor block so they don't include it... pipe pipe just follows new-pipe and includes sponsorblock... So users have the option of new pipe, or pipe pipe - depending on the experience they want - all thanks to open source.

In the source available word we can't get someone to make a grayjay fork with light mode (instead of dark mode,, so brightjay)... because while they can see the source they can't fork the source... This means that all the friction that people would either solve themselves in a push request or in a fork... just get dropped on the feat of grayjay developers as issues and the ecosystem suffers with sloth or abscense

 

Grayjay is the source available video client that has plugin support for youtube. It's not open source like freetube, new pipe, etc... but they are trying to do the right thing

Strong opinions:

  • Dark mode only
  • Not open source

They are trying to do some cool things

  • Sync watch history peer to peer across devices,
  • Follow a creator on multiple platforms

Things they do really well

  • Their youtube plugin works really well, when freetube and newpipe have issues, gray jay always still works

This is all great, right? Whats the problem - Youtube has had some RSS hiccups over the last few days, which added a bunch of friction with freetube, so I thought I'd give grayjay another spin....

It's not ready to replace freetube, the strong opinions!, the desktop client is alpha, with a large number of channels the subscription video list drops lots of videos, can't really filter by watched videos, can't mark a video as watched... rough stuff that freetube gets right

The killer feature should be cross device watch history! (Nobody else is doing this! desktop, android, desktop)... and yet, it doesn't really work. At least with the desktop clients they don't sync unless you repair to the phone, etc

I don't think I can really use grayjay as a daily driver, I'll keep giving it a go when freetube has hiccups... so i'm not done with it.

Unlike freetube you can't support grayjay with crypto, only with stripe! sigh

 

Saturated fat is once again being dragged back into the spotlight, but this time the debate isn’t just about nutrition — it’s about politics, power, and who controls the narrative around public health. In this video, Dr. Eric Westman reacts to recent comments from the FDA Commissioner, appointed under RFK Jr., and breaks down how saturated fat, heart disease, and dietary guidelines are being communicated to the public. What sounds like settled science quickly unravels when you actually examine the data, the studies being cited, and what’s being left out of the conversation.

For decades, Americans were told to fear butter, red meat, and full-fat dairy based on the saturated fat–heart disease hypothesis that originated in the 1960s. That belief shaped national dietary guidelines, school lunches, and medical advice, even as multiple large randomized controlled trials failed to show meaningful reductions in heart attacks, cardiovascular deaths, or all-cause mortality from lowering saturated fat. Dr. Westman explains why selective reporting, oversimplified messaging, and institutional groupthink continue to dominate public guidance long after the science has become far more nuanced.

If you’ve ever wondered why nutrition advice feels contradictory, why outdated ideas refuse to disappear, or why “follow the science” often clashes with lived results, this video pulls back the curtain. The real issue isn’t butter or steak — it’s how weak evidence becomes dogma, how politics influences public health messaging, and why millions of people are still being given advice that may not serve them.

It's exhausting to see people throwing around "misinformation" rather then engaging with the literature. At some people people should admit they are driven by philosophy and not data. The term misinformation implies source of truth correctness........ which can't be backed up by the people throwing it around - i.e. I think there is room for debate, but not room to claim you are beyond question.... That is just dogma.

 

In this video, Dr. Bret Scher shares the latest clinical data on ketogenic therapy for depression, including two new studies showing meaningful improvements, even remission, in people with moderate to severe symptoms. For individuals struggling with treatment-resistant depression, these findings offer real hope and open the door to a new therapeutic pathway: metabolic interventions that target brain energy.

 

The second-ever pilot trial (published in the Journal of Affective Disorders) is making waves: a virtual medically supervised ketogenic diet showed impressive improvements in people with moderate to severe depression, including nearly 7 out of 8 study completers achieving clinical remission.

In this interview, Dr. Bret Scher sits down with lead researcher Dr. Elisa Brietzke, Professor of Psychiatry at Queen’s University, to explore the inspiration, execution, and implications of this study.

What began as a bold idea, that metabolic dysfunction plays a role in depression, evolved into a fully remote clinical intervention. Despite skepticism and challenges, the results were clear: ketogenic therapy can be safely and effectively implemented in a remote outpatient setting. Participants who completed the study experienced improvements in depression, anxiety, and anhedonia (the loss of pleasure).

"Medically supervised ketogenic diet as an adjunctive treatment for moderate to severe depression: A pilot study" - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2025.121079 (Abstract only, but if you know where I can find the full study please let me know)

3
Meat Jelly (Pihtije) (www.youtube.com)
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by jet@hackertalks.com to c/carnivore@discuss.online
 

MEAT JELLY?! Yep — today we’re making Pihtije (PTA), a traditional Serbian meat jelly that’s basically a collagen-rich carnivore dream: slow-simmered meat + broth that sets into a savory, sliceable, insanely satisfying “grab-and-go” snack/meal prep. I learned this one from my mother-in-law, and I’m walking you through it step-by-step so you can nail the texture, the set, and the flavor.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aspic

 

This was a much more enjoyable read then the last book, foundation's edge. We are back to almost reliable narrators and character development.

Overall, a decent read and a reasonable twist.

This book clocks in at 500 pages, which I think is over-generous - large chunks could have been streamlined out without loss of plot or character development.

unreliable patternsFollowing the established pattern of the last three books, about 3/4 of the way through the book all the main characters make some horribly out of character choice (like brining the mule around, the fallom teenager around everywhere) and it sticks out like a sore thumb... And just like the last 3 books it's revealed in the last few pages everyone was being controlled from afar against their better judgement..

I found the entire teenager Fallom tangent insufferable, much like the Mule character.... in lore they have a super fast magic ship that can go anywhere quickly... why not drop off their rescue at Gaia and be done with it... why lug them around... there is no urgency here. it just doesn't make sense.

We never get a satisfactory in-lore reason why our Captain has magic decision making powers that are always ethnically pure.

The wizard of oz has been a positronic robotic for 20,000 years... a robot who can control people's minds through hyperspace... This is the third time this EXACT plot has been used in 5 books... at some point we are going to run out of curtains for the real power to hid behind.

Laws of robotics and agency... harm to human's doesn't include loss of agency in this context (take over teenager's mind, reprogram people at a distance, force everyone into a hive mind). The galaxy brain envisioned is no different then the Matrix, or just straight up lobotomizing everyone... humans will stop evolving and exerting any free will, and that doesn't violate the laws of robotics....

Not to mention the previous laws won't exist in the Fallom/Custodian merged mind, so no more limiters... it's assuming the new entity will be a benevolent galaxy despot... Do you want a Warhammer universe, because this is how you get a Warhammer universe.

I really would have liked to see some discussion of free will, evolution, limitations of hive minds being explored rather then just accepted as gospel (but... magic unreliable narrators)... imagine if the Borg had a good PR agency.

20,000 years is 1,000 generations... humans should be diverging on 20 million planets at this point, even if there are not aliens yet, the humans themselves are becoming them.

9
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by jet@hackertalks.com to c/media_reviews@hackertalks.com
 

WHAT A FUCKING BOOK.... I only finished this book in a spiteful rage.

Coming on the heels of the first three books with 20 year gap, the entire book is filled with unreliable narrators. The literary equivalent of 6 year olds making shit up on the spot as they go. Nothing makes sense or is internally consistent because of "mystic forces" throughout... which shouldn't be too surprising based on the last book, but now its literally every character and every scene.

the ultimate scene where I learn i wasted my time400 pages into this story we get the space mexican standoff between

  • foundation hitler, who is developing technology which might make them independent and autonomous of silly psychic bullshit... and, horror of horror, make them characters with agency and vested interests....

  • foundation big brother.... who doesn't have many redeeming qualities to be honest

  • HIVE MIND, which we JUST FUCKING MEET, which can control anyone from any distance, and wants to control everyone in the galaxy.... but only if we say its ok

We have some cosmic mumbojumbo that makes our decisions perfect crystallization of pure involatile universal truth.... sure... why not.

And like in a bad bethesda rpg we need to choose which of these factions deserves to "win"... no layered incentives to make us invested... no debate about free-will and agency..... Everyone will become (physical slaves, physical slaves to psionic slavelords, or psionically brainwashed into a galactic hivemind)

Talk about insulting the intelligence of the reader... no other fucking options to consider, no debate to be had..... but again.... maybe our protagonist isn't in full control of themselves so we are seeing this through the lens of a unreliable narrator..... FUCK YOU...... What is the point in reading about anything if we can't seriously consider anything written? The book is a wasted 450 pages because any thoughts I have on it can be explained away by some version of "Thats what they wanted you to think".... FUCK THIS BOOK

I'd much rather read a story about how how humans are fighting off evil psionic overlords rather then thousands of pages of text on why being a psionic slave is a rather nifty idea, but only if the right people are in quiet control of the new slave empire.....

Maybe 30,000 years of vigorous galactic competition is a small price to pay to throw off the shackles of forever psionic slavery...... The only reason the author can think of to get any power block to act is if somehow people could have independent thought, and it's expressed as a BAD thing...

Early in the book we meet Speaker Kai Winn, well written character, I was sure she was of Bajor.

 

Good walkthrough of the history of calorie in the context of the insulin model.

summerizerOrigins: heat, respiration, and measurement

  • Lavasier linked respiration with slow combustion and focused on measurable heat output.
  • Ice-melt calorimetry produced repeatable heat numbers; the calorimeter measured heat, not hunger.
  • 1800s calorimetry improvements enabled fuel comparison and efficiency accounting.

Late-1800s shift: apply combustion measurement to food

  • Population growth and industrial scaling increased demand for standardization and measurement.
  • Atwater burned food in a bomb calorimeter; released heat became the food “energy” number.
  • A key assumption followed: the body handles food energy roughly like combustion heat.

Where the calorie model omits biology

  • Digestion differs from sealed-chamber burning; humans are open systems with variable absorption.
  • Digestion costs energy, and hormones route energy to different fates; the bomb calorimeter omits this.
  • A single number can reduce attention to context once it exists.

Why the calorie spread

  • The USDA used calories for efficiency: feeding large groups cheaply and reliably, optimizing output per dollar/pound/shipment.
  • Calories enabled food swapping on paper and scaled ration planning, institutional feeding, and policy metrics.
  • Once embedded in reports and education, calories felt official; labels and regulation made them ubiquitous.

Incentives and downstream behavior

  • One number enabled food arithmetic: eat less, burn more, track the count.
  • Low-calorie options can gain default preference when taste is high; this rewards “tastier with fewer calories” products.

Equal calories, different outcomes example

  • 100 calories of steak and 100 calories of chocolate match on paper but differ in-body.
  • Steak: higher digestive cost, stronger satiety signaling, minimal insulin response, hunger quieter for hours.
  • Chocolate: rapid absorption, blood sugar and insulin spike, brief satiety, hunger returns quickly.

Thermodynamics and system condition

  • Energy conservation constrains what can happen, while complex systems vary within those constraints.
  • “Calories-only” fat loss is like “speed-only” flight: speed matters, but lift, wind, and control determine takeoff and stability.
  • System condition changes outcomes; chronic inflammation narrows margins, reduces efficiency, and alters handling of identical inputs.

Bottom line

  • The calorie persists because it standardizes the unstandardizable and supports administration and marketing.
  • A calorie measures heat energy in food; it does not determine what the body will do with that food.

 

Just finished the second foundation book, the third in the foundation series. It's split into two parts, search by the mule, and search by the foundation.

Overall I'm not sure this book stands up to modern expectations, it was fine for what it was but I couldn't help but get a little tired of the mystery box twists.

thoughts

Both chapters deal with super human psychics that can program other people (one group in person, and one person at a distance). All of this is in the context of shepherding in a new golden age of human prosperity in another 700 years of darkness..

But... if you can program people... why do you need to wait? If you remove people's agency what is the point of them having a "golden age". The aspect of super human paternalistic gardeners falls flat in their lack of execution.

I understand this is probably a product of various short stories trying new things out, and its more fantasy then hard science fiction...

On the whole I'm glad I've read the original foundation trilogy, but don't think I would recommend it to others.

1
deleted (example.org)
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by jet@hackertalks.com to c/interesting@hackertalks.com
 

.

6
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by jet@hackertalks.com to c/carnivore@discuss.online
 

My groceries just got delivered, they helpfully got me real butter... the package proudly says "Pure Butter"

  • 82% Butter oil
  • 2% Milk Powder
  • ?% Soy lecithin

You will notice this "pure button" has ingredients that don't add up to 100%... Butter oil is problematic, it often is a wacky way of saying vegetable oil (though some definitions make it almost sound like Ghee).

In no universe can adding Soy!!!! to a product still count as Pure..... that is just a lie.

If this is Pure butter why do they need to add milk powder? sigh....

view more: next ›