jet

• foundation hitler, who is developing technology which might make them independent and autonomous of silly psychic bullshit... and, horror of horror, make them characters with agency and vested interests....

• foundation big brother.... who doesn't have many redeeming qualities to be honest

• HIVE MIND, which we JUST FUCKING MEET, which can control anyone from any distance, and wants to control everyone in the galaxy.... but only if we say its ok

We have some cosmic mumbojumbo that makes our decisions perfect crystallization of pure involatile universal truth.... sure... why not.

And like in a bad bethesda rpg we need to choose which of these factions deserves to "win"... no layered incentives to make us invested... no debate about free-will and agency..... Everyone will become (physical slaves, physical slaves to psionic slavelords, or psionically brainwashed into a galactic hivemind)

Talk about insulting the intelligence of the reader... no other fucking options to consider, no debate to be had..... but again.... maybe our protagonist isn't in full control of themselves so we are seeing this through the lens of a unreliable narrator..... FUCK YOU...... What is the point in reading about anything if we can't seriously consider anything written? The book is a wasted 450 pages because any thoughts I have on it can be explained away by some version of "Thats what they wanted you to think".... FUCK THIS BOOK

I'd much rather read a story about how how humans are fighting off evil psionic overlords rather then thousands of pages of text on why being a psionic slave is a rather nifty idea, but only if the right people are in quiet control of the new slave empire.....

Maybe 30,000 years of vigorous galactic competition is a small price to pay to throw off the shackles of forever psionic slavery...... The only reason the author can think of to get any power block to act is if somehow people could have independent thought, and it's expressed as a BAD thing...

• Lavasier linked respiration with slow combustion and focused on measurable heat output.
• Ice-melt calorimetry produced repeatable heat numbers; the calorimeter measured heat, not hunger.
• 1800s calorimetry improvements enabled fuel comparison and efficiency accounting.

Late-1800s shift: apply combustion measurement to food

• Population growth and industrial scaling increased demand for standardization and measurement.
• Atwater burned food in a bomb calorimeter; released heat became the food “energy” number.
• A key assumption followed: the body handles food energy roughly like combustion heat.

Where the calorie model omits biology

• Digestion differs from sealed-chamber burning; humans are open systems with variable absorption.
• Digestion costs energy, and hormones route energy to different fates; the bomb calorimeter omits this.
• A single number can reduce attention to context once it exists.

Why the calorie spread

• The USDA used calories for efficiency: feeding large groups cheaply and reliably, optimizing output per dollar/pound/shipment.
• Calories enabled food swapping on paper and scaled ration planning, institutional feeding, and policy metrics.
• Once embedded in reports and education, calories felt official; labels and regulation made them ubiquitous.

Incentives and downstream behavior

• One number enabled food arithmetic: eat less, burn more, track the count.
• Low-calorie options can gain default preference when taste is high; this rewards “tastier with fewer calories” products.

Equal calories, different outcomes example

• 100 calories of steak and 100 calories of chocolate match on paper but differ in-body.
• Steak: higher digestive cost, stronger satiety signaling, minimal insulin response, hunger quieter for hours.
• Chocolate: rapid absorption, blood sugar and insulin spike, brief satiety, hunger returns quickly.

Thermodynamics and system condition

• Energy conservation constrains what can happen, while complex systems vary within those constraints.
• “Calories-only” fat loss is like “speed-only” flight: speed matters, but lift, wind, and control determine takeoff and stability.
• System condition changes outcomes; chronic inflammation narrows margins, reduces efficiency, and alters handling of identical inputs.

Bottom line

• The calorie persists because it standardizes the unstandardizable and supports administration and marketing.
• A calorie measures heat energy in food; it does not determine what the body will do with that food.

Both chapters deal with super human psychics that can program other people (one group in person, and one person at a distance). All of this is in the context of shepherding in a new golden age of human prosperity in another 700 years of darkness..

But... if you can program people... why do you need to wait? If you remove people's agency what is the point of them having a "golden age". The aspect of super human paternalistic gardeners falls flat in their lack of execution.

I understand this is probably a product of various short stories trying new things out, and its more fantasy then hard science fiction...

• Elim Garak starts as a tailor in exile on Deep Space 9; the harmless image is deliberate.
• He has no rank, yet survives crises that remove people with far more formal authority.
• His leverage comes from acting without responsibility, title, or institutional records.

Cardassian power and why exile sharpens Garak

• Cardassian rule uses information and identity as tools; truth is whatever works.
• In "The Wire," loyalty is enforced with secrets, implants, and obligation; survival pairs obedience with deniability.
• In "Second Skin," identity can be rewritten; narrative control punishes ambiguity.
• The Obsidian Order’s inward turn in "Improbable Cause" shows surveillance and secrecy eroding judgment and speeding failure.
• Exile removes incentives to perform belief; Garak sees when certainty is theater and when structures are irrational.

Federation procedure and its failure mode

• The Federation relies on deliberation, checks, and distributed accountability.
• In "Homefront," fear tightens rules through lawful steps; responsibility diffuses until the machinery enables abuse.
• Garak calibrates the Federation’s tolerance for uncertainty and which threats flip it into emergency logic.

Romulan discipline as a different constraint set

• The Romulan system assumes information is suspect until verified; caution is default, not a crisis response.
• In "Inter Arma Enim Silent Leges," intelligence work and moral compromise are built-in mechanisms; the system stays consistent under stress.
• Garak works with Romulan predictability: it moves after an internally consistent conclusion forms, then defends that conclusion forcefully.

"In the Pale Moonlight" as the convergence point

• During the Dominion War, the Federation needs outcomes more than purity, the Romulans need actionable certainty, and Cardassians are primed for decisive moves.
• Garak supplies a conclusion each system can adopt without reopening debate.
• Once the interpretation becomes actionable, institutions protect it; reversal would admit internal misjudgment.
• Garak never needs to command anyone; he removes off-ramps so procedure, caution, and moral outsourcing point the same direction.

Takeaway

• The dangerous operator sits outside the chain of command: no title to revoke, no mandate to cancel, and no institution that can clearly hold him.
• Garak endures by reading systems at their limits and by shaping outcomes through ambiguity, timing, and constraint alignment.

This fucking court jester Magnifico, a character deliberately created to be out of place jarring grating and annoying. The twist at the very end logically explains it but doesn't change the fact I was reading 200 pages annoyed.

Psychohistory as a unreliable narrator, we have already established in the lore that selective omission of truth, and outright lying, are acceptable tools in Hari's toolbox... so is his crisis pep talk in error or is it exactly what they needed to see to do what he wanted? The lack of rigor in a "science" like psychohistory leads to a civilization with slave like mysticism

Regarding psionic programming as a human mutation: This is such a blunt narrative weapon that its reasonable it wasn't accounted for, but also in a galactic empire spanning thousands of years humanity will drift and become different genetically incompatible species, especially in the context of being isolated from each other.

On the other hand why does psychohistory care about humans evolving? Why does it have any opinion on genetic drift? While we are at it, in the context of foundation comparing back to the fall of the roman empire... the prediction is about another empire rising... we have no comparable empire in the world to rome, so we are still in the dark patch...

The pattern for each age appears to be those resisting change are blind to their folly and those embracing a new dynamic win, it would be fun to have a chapter on a moment when staying the course was the right method (i.e. all the time between the 75 year incidents).

• Carb hangover definition: a post-indulgence crash with fatigue, brain fog, ravenous hunger, bloating, cravings, mood swings, poor sleep, and sometimes joint aches or headache after more carbs (often sugar + ultra-processed food) than the keto baseline.
• Why it can hit hard after keto: after sustained keto, my metabolism is adapted to fat/ketones; sudden carbs force a fast fuel switch that can feel abrupt.
  • Mechanism 1 — insulin whiplash: low/stable insulin on keto shifts to a rapid glucose rise + insulin rise; an overshoot can lead to a reactive low with shakiness, hunger, anxiety, and strong carb cravings.
  • Mechanism 2 — glycogen refill + water shift: carbs refill liver/muscle glycogen; glycogen pulls water; the scale can jump 2–8 lb from water + glycogen + inflammation + food volume (plus sodium-related water), not overnight fat gain.
  • Mechanism 3 — gut microbiome shift: fewer fermentable carbs on keto can mean less gas/bloating; a carb-heavy meal (breads/sweets/sugar alcohols/processed foods) can trigger bloating, gas, cramps, reflux, and stool changes, especially for foods not eaten for months.
  • Mechanism 4 — inflammation signals: indulgences often bundle ultra-processed carbs with seed oils/additives/emulsifiers/high sugar; susceptible people can feel puffy, achy, headachy, or get skin flare-ups and tight rings.
  • Mechanism 5 — sleep disruption: big late meals, sugar swings, alcohol, reflux, and histamine-rich holiday foods can disrupt sleep; poor sleep then increases hunger hormones and cravings the next day.
  • Mechanism 6 — appetite + reward: processed carbs can reactivate “more” circuitry and dopamine-driven reward eating; “I wasn’t hungry, but I couldn’t stop” fits food engineering + biochemistry.
• Language and mindset: calling it a “cheat” can trigger “I failed, so keep going”; I treat it as a planned or unplanned indulgence with the same job afterward—return to baseline quickly and calmly, with no shame or punishment.
• Two-day keto reset protocol after an indulgence:
  • Step 1 — hydrate steadily: carbs shift water/electrolytes; aim for steady hydration, add electrolytes/sodium if tolerated, avoid late-night water chugging.
  • Step 2 — next bite is the reset: protein first, then fat, then everything else; start at the next meal with high-protein keto food, add fat for satiety, keep carbs low (examples: eggs+bacon+avocado; ground beef with salt and a little cheese if tolerated; salmon+butter+asparagus if using low-carb veg).
  • Step 3 — walk after meals: 10–20 minutes post-meal walking helps move glucose into muscle and reduce the spike; no intense exercise required.
  • Step 4 — 24 hours of clean keto: whole foods only; avoid “keto junk” and alcohol; focus on meat/eggs/fish/non-starchy veg if used/basic fats; goal is lower inflammation and stabilized appetite, not punishment.
  • Step 5 — optional short fast: if already comfortable fasting, a 12–16 hour overnight fast can help slide back into ketosis; if fasting causes obsession, shakiness, or binge-proneness, skip it.
  • Step 6 — salt + sleep: adequate salt can help after water shifts; prioritize sleep because sleep is hormonal therapy.
• The mistake that turns a detour into relapse: trying to “make up” with punishment (starving all day, over-exercising, harsh self-talk) increases stress, worsens sleep, increases cravings, and often leads to more overeating.
• Indulgence without a big price: the three-P rule.
  • Plan it: choose the event and the food that actually matters, not random breakroom donuts.
  • Protein buffer: eat protein earlier so you don’t arrive starving.
  • Portion with purpose: have a real serving, enjoy it, stop; treat it as celebration, not self-sabotage.
• Closing takeaway: the carb hangover is feedback about stability; learning the pattern (insulin swing, water retention, gut reaction, inflammation, sleepiness) reduces spiral power and supports metabolic health.

• The internet should work like the early web: people own their space, audience, and rules.
• Platforms replaced the web by taking ownership; the goal is to rebuild the web’s utility without surrendering control.
• Privacy is not about being unseen; IP addresses are observable; the goal is minimizing who must be trusted.
• Avoid building a new centralized service; publish open software so anyone can run servers; operators are replaceable.
• Build for the 99%: strong defaults and UX so security is not limited to experts and custom ROM users.

What SimpleX is building

• A messenger without user IDs; connections start via one-time links or QR codes.
• Messaging uses unidirectional message queues; each direction can use different relays.
• Each contact can use different relay servers; rotation limits correlation and reduces single-operator power.
• Relays route encrypted blocks and cannot enumerate users or social graphs.

From messenger to “next web”

• SimpleX extends into primitives: messaging, groups, channels, bots, and “sites”.
• Communities become user-owned spaces like websites: owners control content, moderation, and membership.
• Scaling model: many rooms and roles; a 100,000-member community should not be one chat.
• Target experience: Discord-like communities with far more owner and user control.

Decentralization and moderation realities

• Federated networks form clusters where admins own accounts and can coordinate policy and censorship.
• If a few percent of nodes are captured, randomized routing can still be forced into an attacker’s path.
• Better model: many independent operators with low individual visibility; users choose and can switch.

Metadata and transport privacy

• IP metadata is theoretically observable; Tor/VPN/mixnets change who can see it, not whether it exists.
• Padding sends fixed 16KB blocks so relays can’t infer content size or activity type.
• A relay sees counts, not contacts; 100 messages could be 1 or 100 recipients.
• Roadmap includes supporting alternative transports like I2P and mixnet-style routing.

Security engineering posture

• Deniability matters for casual conversation; OTR introduced practical repudiation and forward secrecy.
• Two security audits completed; recurring audits planned.
• Spam and abuse controls avoid identifiers; optional user addresses can be deleted or rotated.

Business and distribution constraints

• App stores gate distribution; sideloading and F-Droid matter for reach.
• Funding reality: privacy tech competes with products backed by 100x–500x more investment.
• B2B2C model: communities pay so members can be free; 80/20 traffic economics inform pricing.

References

• [00:00] SimpleX Chat — https://simplex.chat/
• [00:00] Signal Protocol — https://signal.org/docs/ [00:18] Nostr Protocol — https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nostr
• [00:49] Off-the-Record Communication, or, Why Not To Use PGP — https://doi.org/10.1145/1029179.1029200