jet

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] jet@hackertalks.com 7 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UC6bv6Ies3A

Amazing timing, I just watched this breakdown of Mexican coke

 

Good walkthrough of the history of calorie in the context of the insulin model.

summerizerOrigins: heat, respiration, and measurement

  • Lavasier linked respiration with slow combustion and focused on measurable heat output.
  • Ice-melt calorimetry produced repeatable heat numbers; the calorimeter measured heat, not hunger.
  • 1800s calorimetry improvements enabled fuel comparison and efficiency accounting.

Late-1800s shift: apply combustion measurement to food

  • Population growth and industrial scaling increased demand for standardization and measurement.
  • Atwater burned food in a bomb calorimeter; released heat became the food “energy” number.
  • A key assumption followed: the body handles food energy roughly like combustion heat.

Where the calorie model omits biology

  • Digestion differs from sealed-chamber burning; humans are open systems with variable absorption.
  • Digestion costs energy, and hormones route energy to different fates; the bomb calorimeter omits this.
  • A single number can reduce attention to context once it exists.

Why the calorie spread

  • The USDA used calories for efficiency: feeding large groups cheaply and reliably, optimizing output per dollar/pound/shipment.
  • Calories enabled food swapping on paper and scaled ration planning, institutional feeding, and policy metrics.
  • Once embedded in reports and education, calories felt official; labels and regulation made them ubiquitous.

Incentives and downstream behavior

  • One number enabled food arithmetic: eat less, burn more, track the count.
  • Low-calorie options can gain default preference when taste is high; this rewards “tastier with fewer calories” products.

Equal calories, different outcomes example

  • 100 calories of steak and 100 calories of chocolate match on paper but differ in-body.
  • Steak: higher digestive cost, stronger satiety signaling, minimal insulin response, hunger quieter for hours.
  • Chocolate: rapid absorption, blood sugar and insulin spike, brief satiety, hunger returns quickly.

Thermodynamics and system condition

  • Energy conservation constrains what can happen, while complex systems vary within those constraints.
  • “Calories-only” fat loss is like “speed-only” flight: speed matters, but lift, wind, and control determine takeoff and stability.
  • System condition changes outcomes; chronic inflammation narrows margins, reduces efficiency, and alters handling of identical inputs.

Bottom line

  • The calorie persists because it standardizes the unstandardizable and supports administration and marketing.
  • A calorie measures heat energy in food; it does not determine what the body will do with that food.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 2 points 11 hours ago

extremely psychologically invested in practicing cruelty and violence with intent.

Assuming intent.

They are fucked in the head real real bad

Bad Faith, Ad hominem

They will take a “reasonable tone” and pretend to be the mature party

Because I am, I love to read and discuss. Our attempts at mutual discussion end up with you just going into this name calling.

everything they say is twisted into bad faith, and I can’t even tell if they know they do it.

Nothing I do is in bad faith. I have opinions and I admit they may be wrong. I'm open to evidence and discussion to find a better optimal approach to health.


Honestly all these personal attacks are wearisome and its easy to see why moderators start painting with a broad brush

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 0 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

There is much higher vegan representation on lemmy than usual which is probably why it seems like there is, but the standard jokes and insults still get played out to a regular degree.

I would like to point out you have been joking and insulting me in your other comments(not responding to me directly), yet I don't reciprocate.

inherent antivegan bias in standard discourse

Honestly, I feel this. Zero Carb gets the SAD people, the Omnivores, and the pbf people taking shots at you... So i understand what its like to have a niche opinion that gets immediately criticized.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 0 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

What about insulting an entire demographic without even being prompted?

Eye for an eye leaves the world blind.

limited by “rational, civilized” discourse while the antivegans are allowed to run roughshod with insults and jokes about us.

There are 75, SEVENTY FIVE, vegan communities on lemmy last I checked, there is no lack of representation.

It is an uneven playfield and the rules work against us, so I won’t play by them.

Right, so you just want to fight, and break community rules and that is why the ban is YDI.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (5 children)

So insulting a entire demographic of people is fine so long as one of them offended you first? That is why your coming off as combative.

As someone who wants to talk about the benefits of a zero carb diet (carnivore), I've been called many nasty things along these lines... they are rhetorical tools used in anger when argument arent available (either due to emotion or attempting to "win")

And no, my point isn't to "win" a debate, which is why I rarely engage in debating behavior. I want to push back against popaganda, to make vegan voices heard and to not leave carnist propaganda unchallenged.

Great, I invite you to make a post in !carnivore@discuss.online to educate us on our propaganda problems (as long as you can engage in polite productive discussions suitable for a work environment)

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 4 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (12 children)

It's clear your very passionate. But your coming across as combative and looking for a fight.

Oh no why won’t the corpsemunchers like me 😢

REALLY looking for a fight.

As someone who has often dipped my toes into this very debate - most people are not looking for a actual discussion - they just want to win. I think this includes you too

No source is ever good enough, no proof ever strict enough etc.

If only there were people who had standards for the evidence they will consider.... https://hackertalks.com/post/15439661

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 7 points 13 hours ago

https://eylenburg.github.io/im_comparison.htm

Falling back to email isn't a most preferred backup, I'd rather do simplex

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 1 points 21 hours ago

Antennapod and newpipe/pipepipe have sleep timers!

Audiobooks from Pratchett, Niven, Adams are my favorite

Hardcore history

Well there's your problem

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 4 points 22 hours ago

Showing when people are double booked is nice

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 1 points 1 day ago

Don't link or setup an icloud account.

Have a admin account, never use it

Run everything from a unprivileged account

Use virtual machines such as UTM to segment your different workloads.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 4 points 1 day ago

A man of art and refined taste!

 

Just finished the second foundation book, the third in the foundation series. It's split into two parts, search by the mule, and search by the foundation.

Overall I'm not sure this book stands up to modern expectations, it was fine for what it was but I couldn't help but get a little tired of the mystery box twists.

thoughts

Both chapters deal with super human psychics that can program other people (one group in person, and one person at a distance). All of this is in the context of shepherding in a new golden age of human prosperity in another 700 years of darkness..

But... if you can program people... why do you need to wait? If you remove people's agency what is the point of them having a "golden age". The aspect of super human paternalistic gardeners falls flat in their lack of execution.

I understand this is probably a product of various short stories trying new things out, and its more fantasy then hard science fiction...

On the whole I'm glad I've read the original foundation trilogy, but don't think I would recommend it to others.

1
deleted (example.org)
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by jet@hackertalks.com to c/interesting@hackertalks.com
 

.

5
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by jet@hackertalks.com to c/carnivore@discuss.online
 

My groceries just got delivered, they helpfully got me real butter... the package proudly says "Pure Butter"

  • 82% Butter oil
  • 2% Milk Powder
  • ?% Soy lecithin

You will notice this "pure button" has ingredients that don't add up to 100%... Butter oil is problematic, it often is a wacky way of saying vegetable oil (though some definitions make it almost sound like Ghee).

In no universe can adding Soy!!!! to a product still count as Pure..... that is just a lie.

If this is Pure butter why do they need to add milk powder? sigh....

 

framing misses what actually makes him dangerous.

In Star Trek: Deep Space Nine, Garak rarely holds power, never commands fleets, and almost never decides outcomes directly. Yet again and again, he survives moments that destroy far more powerful figures. This video examines Garak not as a mastermind or secret ruler, but as something more unsettling: a character who understands how institutions behave under pressure - and knows where to stand when they begin to fail.

By looking at Cardassia, the Federation, and the Romulan Star Empire as systems rather than ideologies, this essay explores how Garak navigates authoritarian control, procedural restraint, and evidentiary paranoia without ever needing authority of his own. From Past Prologue to In the Pale Moonlight, Garak’s role isn’t to control events - it’s to recognize when rules, values, and safeguards are about to give way.

This isn’t a character defense, and it isn’t a celebration of manipulation. It’s an analysis of how empires preserve themselves, how responsibility gets outsourced in moments of crisis, and why individuals who operate between systems become briefly indispensable - and just as quickly discarded.

Garak didn’t win the war. He understood it.

summerizerGarak’s cover story and real leverage

  • Elim Garak starts as a tailor in exile on Deep Space 9; the harmless image is deliberate.
  • He has no rank, yet survives crises that remove people with far more formal authority.
  • His leverage comes from acting without responsibility, title, or institutional records.

Cardassian power and why exile sharpens Garak

  • Cardassian rule uses information and identity as tools; truth is whatever works.
  • In "The Wire," loyalty is enforced with secrets, implants, and obligation; survival pairs obedience with deniability.
  • In "Second Skin," identity can be rewritten; narrative control punishes ambiguity.
  • The Obsidian Order’s inward turn in "Improbable Cause" shows surveillance and secrecy eroding judgment and speeding failure.
  • Exile removes incentives to perform belief; Garak sees when certainty is theater and when structures are irrational.

Federation procedure and its failure mode

  • The Federation relies on deliberation, checks, and distributed accountability.
  • In "Homefront," fear tightens rules through lawful steps; responsibility diffuses until the machinery enables abuse.
  • Garak calibrates the Federation’s tolerance for uncertainty and which threats flip it into emergency logic.

Romulan discipline as a different constraint set

  • The Romulan system assumes information is suspect until verified; caution is default, not a crisis response.
  • In "Inter Arma Enim Silent Leges," intelligence work and moral compromise are built-in mechanisms; the system stays consistent under stress.
  • Garak works with Romulan predictability: it moves after an internally consistent conclusion forms, then defends that conclusion forcefully.

"In the Pale Moonlight" as the convergence point

  • During the Dominion War, the Federation needs outcomes more than purity, the Romulans need actionable certainty, and Cardassians are primed for decisive moves.
  • Garak supplies a conclusion each system can adopt without reopening debate.
  • Once the interpretation becomes actionable, institutions protect it; reversal would admit internal misjudgment.
  • Garak never needs to command anyone; he removes off-ramps so procedure, caution, and moral outsourcing point the same direction.

Takeaway

  • The dangerous operator sits outside the chain of command: no title to revoke, no mandate to cancel, and no institution that can clearly hold him.
  • Garak endures by reading systems at their limits and by shaping outcomes through ambiguity, timing, and constraint alignment.

 

A good book overall, but drags in places. ~300 pages, some of the text was a bit hard to parse in places (could have just been my printing edition ungraceful formatting). That said I breezed through it fairly quickly and finished it in a afternoon.

Two short stories in this book

thoughts on The GeneralOn its own this felt like much ado about nothing, with the mystic leavers of psychohistory making the entire book moot. In the context of the fall of the republic of rome this story makes much more sense, power itself is dangerous and a crime worthy of punishment, success in itself failure.

thoughts on The Mule

This fucking court jester Magnifico, a character deliberately created to be out of place jarring grating and annoying. The twist at the very end logically explains it but doesn't change the fact I was reading 200 pages annoyed.

Psychohistory as a unreliable narrator, we have already established in the lore that selective omission of truth, and outright lying, are acceptable tools in Hari's toolbox... so is his crisis pep talk in error or is it exactly what they needed to see to do what he wanted? The lack of rigor in a "science" like psychohistory leads to a civilization with slave like mysticism

Regarding psionic programming as a human mutation: This is such a blunt narrative weapon that its reasonable it wasn't accounted for, but also in a galactic empire spanning thousands of years humanity will drift and become different genetically incompatible species, especially in the context of being isolated from each other.

On the other hand why does psychohistory care about humans evolving? Why does it have any opinion on genetic drift? While we are at it, in the context of foundation comparing back to the fall of the roman empire... the prediction is about another empire rising... we have no comparable empire in the world to rome, so we are still in the dark patch...

 

I finally got around to reading foundation, I picked it up this afternoon, it was quite a breezy read, finished the entire book in a few hours.

Very much worth the read! I'm a little disappointed the version I have has advertisements for Apple TV yet still has typos and printing errors 75 years after the first printing.....

fresh thoughtsThe psychohistorian aspect is interesting, i think it could have been explored a bit more, the first book discusses it a bit (predicting moments in history though large crowd predictions vs great man theory). After the first book its taken as mythic gospel (by design)....

The pattern for each age appears to be those resisting change are blind to their folly and those embracing a new dynamic win, it would be fun to have a chapter on a moment when staying the course was the right method (i.e. all the time between the 75 year incidents).

 
  • power
  • Ethernet
  • water gun

Standard

 

In this video, I’m breaking down what’s happening mechanistically so you stop blaming willpower and start understanding biology. We’ll talk about why the scale can jump overnight, why your belly feels like it’s auditioning for a balloon parade, and why cravings can feel louder after ultra-processed carbs. If you’ve ever said, “Doc… I ate the stuffing and now I need a nap and a therapist,” you’re in the right place.

summerizer

  • Carb hangover definition: a post-indulgence crash with fatigue, brain fog, ravenous hunger, bloating, cravings, mood swings, poor sleep, and sometimes joint aches or headache after more carbs (often sugar + ultra-processed food) than the keto baseline.
  • Why it can hit hard after keto: after sustained keto, my metabolism is adapted to fat/ketones; sudden carbs force a fast fuel switch that can feel abrupt.
    • Mechanism 1 — insulin whiplash: low/stable insulin on keto shifts to a rapid glucose rise + insulin rise; an overshoot can lead to a reactive low with shakiness, hunger, anxiety, and strong carb cravings.
    • Mechanism 2 — glycogen refill + water shift: carbs refill liver/muscle glycogen; glycogen pulls water; the scale can jump 2–8 lb from water + glycogen + inflammation + food volume (plus sodium-related water), not overnight fat gain.
    • Mechanism 3 — gut microbiome shift: fewer fermentable carbs on keto can mean less gas/bloating; a carb-heavy meal (breads/sweets/sugar alcohols/processed foods) can trigger bloating, gas, cramps, reflux, and stool changes, especially for foods not eaten for months.
    • Mechanism 4 — inflammation signals: indulgences often bundle ultra-processed carbs with seed oils/additives/emulsifiers/high sugar; susceptible people can feel puffy, achy, headachy, or get skin flare-ups and tight rings.
    • Mechanism 5 — sleep disruption: big late meals, sugar swings, alcohol, reflux, and histamine-rich holiday foods can disrupt sleep; poor sleep then increases hunger hormones and cravings the next day.
    • Mechanism 6 — appetite + reward: processed carbs can reactivate “more” circuitry and dopamine-driven reward eating; “I wasn’t hungry, but I couldn’t stop” fits food engineering + biochemistry.
  • Language and mindset: calling it a “cheat” can trigger “I failed, so keep going”; I treat it as a planned or unplanned indulgence with the same job afterward—return to baseline quickly and calmly, with no shame or punishment.
  • Two-day keto reset protocol after an indulgence:
    • Step 1 — hydrate steadily: carbs shift water/electrolytes; aim for steady hydration, add electrolytes/sodium if tolerated, avoid late-night water chugging.
    • Step 2 — next bite is the reset: protein first, then fat, then everything else; start at the next meal with high-protein keto food, add fat for satiety, keep carbs low (examples: eggs+bacon+avocado; ground beef with salt and a little cheese if tolerated; salmon+butter+asparagus if using low-carb veg).
    • Step 3 — walk after meals: 10–20 minutes post-meal walking helps move glucose into muscle and reduce the spike; no intense exercise required.
    • Step 4 — 24 hours of clean keto: whole foods only; avoid “keto junk” and alcohol; focus on meat/eggs/fish/non-starchy veg if used/basic fats; goal is lower inflammation and stabilized appetite, not punishment.
    • Step 5 — optional short fast: if already comfortable fasting, a 12–16 hour overnight fast can help slide back into ketosis; if fasting causes obsession, shakiness, or binge-proneness, skip it.
    • Step 6 — salt + sleep: adequate salt can help after water shifts; prioritize sleep because sleep is hormonal therapy.
  • The mistake that turns a detour into relapse: trying to “make up” with punishment (starving all day, over-exercising, harsh self-talk) increases stress, worsens sleep, increases cravings, and often leads to more overeating.
  • Indulgence without a big price: the three-P rule.
    • Plan it: choose the event and the food that actually matters, not random breakroom donuts.
    • Protein buffer: eat protein earlier so you don’t arrive starving.
    • Portion with purpose: have a real serving, enjoy it, stop; treat it as celebration, not self-sabotage.
  • Closing takeaway: the carb hangover is feedback about stability; learning the pattern (insulin swing, water retention, gut reaction, inflammation, sleepiness) reduces spiral power and supports metabolic health.

 

SimpleX Chat is the only messaging network where users have no identifiers—no phone numbers, no usernames, no user IDs at all. Henry interviewed founder Evgeny Poberezkin about how unidirectional message pipes create a network where servers don't even know users exist, why this isn't federation, how it compares to Signal and Session, and why the company is based in the UK despite encryption battles.

It's interesting that he see's his project as just a distributed message queue and not really as the simplex chat application

The discussion about how federated censorship could be compounded from the users perspective... its a good motivation for a unopinionated message queue, users get the authority not the servers.. fungible network operators.

summerizerPhilosophy and motivations

  • The internet should work like the early web: people own their space, audience, and rules.
  • Platforms replaced the web by taking ownership; the goal is to rebuild the web’s utility without surrendering control.
  • Privacy is not about being unseen; IP addresses are observable; the goal is minimizing who must be trusted.
  • Avoid building a new centralized service; publish open software so anyone can run servers; operators are replaceable.
  • Build for the 99%: strong defaults and UX so security is not limited to experts and custom ROM users.

What SimpleX is building

  • A messenger without user IDs; connections start via one-time links or QR codes.
  • Messaging uses unidirectional message queues; each direction can use different relays.
  • Each contact can use different relay servers; rotation limits correlation and reduces single-operator power.
  • Relays route encrypted blocks and cannot enumerate users or social graphs.

From messenger to “next web”

  • SimpleX extends into primitives: messaging, groups, channels, bots, and “sites”.
  • Communities become user-owned spaces like websites: owners control content, moderation, and membership.
  • Scaling model: many rooms and roles; a 100,000-member community should not be one chat.
  • Target experience: Discord-like communities with far more owner and user control.

Decentralization and moderation realities

  • Federated networks form clusters where admins own accounts and can coordinate policy and censorship.
  • If a few percent of nodes are captured, randomized routing can still be forced into an attacker’s path.
  • Better model: many independent operators with low individual visibility; users choose and can switch.

Metadata and transport privacy

  • IP metadata is theoretically observable; Tor/VPN/mixnets change who can see it, not whether it exists.
  • Padding sends fixed 16KB blocks so relays can’t infer content size or activity type.
  • A relay sees counts, not contacts; 100 messages could be 1 or 100 recipients.
  • Roadmap includes supporting alternative transports like I2P and mixnet-style routing.

Security engineering posture

  • Deniability matters for casual conversation; OTR introduced practical repudiation and forward secrecy.
  • Two security audits completed; recurring audits planned.
  • Spam and abuse controls avoid identifiers; optional user addresses can be deleted or rotated.

Business and distribution constraints

  • App stores gate distribution; sideloading and F-Droid matter for reach.
  • Funding reality: privacy tech competes with products backed by 100x–500x more investment.
  • B2B2C model: communities pay so members can be free; 80/20 traffic economics inform pricing.

References

 
 

Topic: Ben explains how AMPK and mTOR are critical regulators of aging and metabolism, and how their balance can be influenced by diet and lifestyle. Instead of drugs like rapamycin, strategies like carbohydrate restriction and ketosis offer a safer path to optimizing longevity.

Summary: In this Metabolic Classroom mini lecture, Dr. Bikman explores two of the most important molecular “switches” that regulate how cells age, grow, and repair themselves: AMPK and mTOR.

These pathways operate in a delicate balance—AMPK promotes energy conservation, fat oxidation, and cellular cleanup (autophagy), while mTOR supports cellular growth and protein synthesis. When AMPK is up, mTOR is down, and vice versa.

Ben explains how modern lifestyles—especially chronic overnutrition and excess carbohydrate intake—shift this balance toward persistent mTOR activation, which may accelerate aging and metabolic disease. He critiques the growing popularity of rapamycin for longevity, citing its lack of human data and serious side effects, particularly reproductive harm. Instead, he proposes that simple lifestyle strategies—like carbohydrate restriction, ketosis, and supplementation with ketones like BHB—can more safely optimize the AMPK/mTOR balance.

He also highlights the importance of ketones as both energy sources and signaling molecules that can activate AMPK and stimulate autophagy. The lecture ends with a clear takeaway: longevity and metabolic health may not require pharmaceuticals, but rather informed choices around diet and lifestyle.

summerizerAMPK and mTOR are the two master switches inside cells that set the balance between repair and growth.

Growth vs repair

  • AMPK turns on when energy is low and tells cells to stop building and start repairing.
  • mTOR turns on when food is abundant and tells cells to grow, build, and divide.
  • Modern life keeps mTOR on all day through constant food, insulin, and growth signals, which crowds out repair.

What AMPK does when it is on

  • AMPK is an energy sensor and rises with low cellular energy.
  • Autophagy increases, and the cleanup program removes damaged proteins and dysfunctional mitochondria.
  • It supports stress-response transcription factors (FOXO and NRF2) and suppresses inflammation.
  • A 2012 paper links AMPK, mTOR, and ULK1 as a direct control point for autophagy initiation.

What chronic mTOR does

  • mTOR is a growth and nutrient integrator (insulin, amino acids, calories).
  • Short, meal-driven mTOR activation supports building, and chronic activation reduces cellular maintenance.

Ways to shift the switch toward repair

  • Time between meals moves signaling toward AMPK.
  • Lower insulin signaling reduces mTOR activation.
  • Protein amount and amino-acid mix matter because amino acids (especially leucine) activate mTOR.

Drug examples in longevity narratives

  • Rapamycin targets mTOR, and a 2009 Nature paper shows longer mouse lifespan even with later-life dosing.
  • Larger mouse lifespan effects are shown at higher doses in later studies.
  • In humans, rapamycin-class drugs are used for transplantation and have reproductive side effects in men and women.
  • Metformin is an anti-diabetic drug tied to AMPK, and a Nature paper links metformin binding to PEN2, ATPase inhibition, and AMPK activation without ATP depletion.

Ketones and ketogenic diet signaling

  • Beta-hydroxybutyrate (BHB) is a ketone that can activate AMPK and support autophagy.
  • A Cells paper links BHB to the autophagic–lysosomal pathway and shows brain changes in mice on a ketogenic diet.

Bottom line

  • Aging slows when the cell periodically shifts away from constant growth signaling and back toward repair and cleanup.

References

view more: next ›