Well I mean it did work. You have now shared it and made it a meme for others to enjoy, it’s fulfilled it’s task successfully.
100% want this to become a meme.
JhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZ
Only cool Lemmy insiders get the joke
Did our narwhall just bacon
Ugh all these newbies just don't get it. It's ZJh, people! It's always been ZJh!
Task failed successfully.
I'm certain this is absolutely hilarious in robot, you're just too fleshy and inefficient to understand.
As a non robot and definitely a human person who is of the homo sapiens species, I can tell you that this humorous meme is quite hilarious to those of us who have soft bodies and are not made of any mechanical parts whatsoever. I suspect suspect suspect suspect you of being a robot in disguise! Everyone get them!
JhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJ hZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJh ZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZ JhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJ...
The Aristocrats!
It's funnier in binary.
I prefer hexadecimal. The encoded data in its entirety is
89 50 4E 47 0D 0A 1A 0A
00 00 00 0D 49 48 44 52
00 00 01 2C 00 00 01 2C
08 06 00 00 00 B9 B4 AC
33 00 00 01 A4 49 44 41
54 78 9C ED DD 41 8E 83
40 10 85 E1 7F 7F E4 B2
72 25 92 61 64 98 59 26
16 49 85 92 61 64 98 59
26 16 49 85 92 61 64 98
59 26 16 49 85 92 61 64
98 59 26 16 49 85 92 61
64 98 59 26 16 49 85 92
61 64 98 59 26 16 49 85
92 61 64 98 59 26 16 49
85 92 61 64 98 59 26 16
49 85 92 61 64 98 59 26
16 49 85 92 61 64 98 59
26 16 49 85 92 61 64 98
59 26 16 49 85 92 61 64
98 59 26 16 49 85 92 61
64 98 59 26 16 49 85 92
61 64 98 59 26 16 49 85
92 61 64 98 59 26 16 49
85 92 61 64 98 59 26 16
49 85 92 61 64 98 59 26
16 49 85 92 61 64 98 59
26 16 49 85 92 61 64 98
59 26 16 49 85 92 61 64
98 59 26 1(abrupt end at 4 bits of last byte)
We can analyze the PNG file header. Surprisingly, some of it makes sense.
89 50 4E 47 0D 0A 1A 0A //PNG signature (0x89 P N G 0xD 0xA 0x1A 0xA)
00 00 00 0D // Start of chunk with data length 13 bytes
49 48 44 52 // Type of chunk: IHDR (image header)
00 00 01 2C // Width: 300 px
00 00 01 2C // Height: 300 px
08 // Bits per color channel: 8
06 // Color format: 6 (RGBA)
00 // Compression method: 0 (DEFLATE)
00 // Filter method: 0 (Adaptive)
00 // Interlace method: 0 (None)
B9 B4 AC 33 // CRC-32 of chunk (invalid, should be 79 7D 8E 75)
00 00 01 A4 // Start of chunk with data length 420 bytes
49 44 41 54 // Type of chunk: IDAT (image data)
78 9C ED DD 41 8E 83 40
10 85 E1 7F 7F E4 B2 72 25
92 61 64 98 59 26 16 49 85
92 61 64 98 59 26 16 49 85
92 61 64 98 59 26 16 49 85
92 61 64 98 59 26 16 49 85
92 61 64 98 59 26 16 49 85
92 61 64 98 59 26 16 49 85
92 61 64 98 59 26 16 49 85
92 61 64 98 59 26 16 49 85
92 61 64 98 59 26 16 49 85
92 61 64 98 59 26 16 49 85
92 61 64 98 59 26 16 49 85
92 61 64 98 59 26 16 49 85
92 61 64 98 59 26 16 49 85
92 61 64 98 59 26 16 49 85
92 61 64 98 59 26 16 49 85
92 61 64 98 59 26 16 49 85
92 61 64 98 59 26 16 49 85
92 61 64 98 59 26 16 49 85
92 61 64 98 59 26 16 49 85
92 61 64 98 59 26 1
// 194.5 of the expected 420 data bytes, invalid when attempting to deflate
// the deflate algorithm needs a Huffman tree but an unfull one is presented
Credits to the PNG chunk inspector at nayuki.io
You may try to figure out if the header checksum was stolen from elsewhere and corresponds to another common image size but I cannot be bothered. The data could be subjected to forensic analysis but we only really have 21 unique bytes, the rest is likely nonsense because data encoded by the DEFLATE algorithm is unlikely to be so repetitive. Also, the image in total will likely have just 481 bytes (8+(8+13+4)+(8+420+4)+16), as a less-than-65535-byte IDAT chunk tends to be the last one before a 16-byte trailer. There are very few 300x300 PNGs of such small size we could call memes, most of it will have to be just solid color. Example of a 256x256 map tile you can store in around that size (467 B):
(And this one is pre-optimized, using an indexed palette of just 13 distinct RGB colors as opposed to the full RGBA gamut!)
Would be funnier if the 11th byte was d0 instead of 00.
“come up with a funny comment to post on lemmy”
“Sure, I can try to generate a funny comment for you. Lemmy is a federated link aggregator and discussion platform, similar to Reddit. Here are some possible comments you can post on lemmy:
I hope you find these comments amusing and suitable for lemmy. 😄”
Christ, why even have people anymore? Just have ChatGPT be all the users. It's already indistinguishable.
You've just described every bluecheck on Twitter.
Not joking
Just doing a search for "I am an AI Language model" (with quotes) is enough to reveal a bunch of those loser ass accounts.
Spez is way ahead of you on that one.
I actually wonder what a purely AI/ChatGPT community would look like (no human posts/comments allowed), would they eventually start to develop their own weird culture, memes, inside comment jokes that nobody would even understand? There’d be like a picture of a tire and a rubber ducky with the text reading “Five fingers / garden hose” and all the comments would be things like “The wombat, in ascension, remembers. Nautilus.” Like how fucking weird would they get without human intervention?
We had that on reddit, subreddit simulator I think? It was a more primitive version of LLM, and it didn't train itself on content from the simulator sub.
ngl, a few of them actually made the corners of my mouth twitch up for a split second, so it's better than 99% on @lemmyshitpost
Apart from #3, those are all terrible. And for reference, it’s pronounced lay-mee 😉
Well there is an image there, its just encoded into base64 text
it's meta and some assembly is required: the meme is the broken response so you can screenshot it and post on lemmy
The response isn't even broken. It's not finished. It gives responses in markdown, same as Lemmy. That is the syntax for a picture embed, it's just still typing the rest and it doesn't show it until it's finished typing.
I analyzed it in another comment: the header says the image is 300x300px 8-bit RGBA but the data is invalid. Most viewers will notice that and show an error.
However, the syntax it used for embedding images is valid, as data:image/png;base64, is the start of a valid image URL and you can use it like other image URLs in supported Markdown interpretors.
Example, using the 103-byte Google Maps' sea tiles, and a 178-byte GIF:
renders as
Works in the default web interface
1 of 30
Dude is creating a memetic kill agent or something
Wenn ist das Nunstück git und Slotermeyer? Ja! Beiherhund das Oder die Flipperwaldt gersput!
That's just the total message limit for one chat
If only they paid $14 billion, it would have included the base64 to image capability.
It's only missing a closing parenthesis. That's very close to a meme
To be fair, it did spit out a couple of completely nonsensical images afterwards:
I think the AI might be biased against dogs.
If it's Dall-E, it inserts the words 'ethnically ambiguous' into images constantly. I'm not the only one who's noticed.
https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/events/ethnically-ambiguous-ai-prompt-injection
did it give you the images in base64 from an llm, or from an image generation model ?
I think you can guess that part. I doubt a current LLM can create a valid PNG, even if it's just a 1x1px one that has been created before. This is partially because PNGs have a checksum and the LLM has definitely not seen enough PNGs in base64 to figure out the algorithm, and is not optimized to calculate checksums. In fact, I analyzed the image and the image header checksum is wrong even though the header makes sense (was likely stolen). Also, it gets penalized for repetition, which occurs a lot in image headers.
AFAIK, the smallest valid image you see mentioned on the web is a 35-byte transparent pixel GIF, and the smallest PNG is a black pixel with 67 bytes:


Testing rendering: 
, 
, another 67-byte PNG but 8 px wide: 
, or 1 gray pixel: 
, or a green one: 
JhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJ hZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJh ZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZ
🤣
It's amazing how Microsoft can take good models and absolutely ruin them in production... ChatGPT isn't perfect but it's like the difference between talking to the wall and talking to an avg IQ person that has reasoning capabilities in many domains that equals or exceeds human performance, if the user knows how to get the best prompt. That changes a little every time they do major model updates though.
I've had more intelligent conversations with my own computer running a 3 billion parameter open source model. They must be wasting an incredible amount of money. Especially with GPT-4 considering it produces pretty shit results through Bing Chat...
I don't think that's a problem with the model itself, but the fact that it was heavily censored and lobotomized in order to achieve maximum political correctness so they could avoid another Tay incident.
It makes sense that they do that since the media and randoms on the internet think everything chatGPT and Bing chat say is as valid as info from OpenAI and MS official spokespersons.
Can that be decoded in to an image at all or is it just garbage?
Pretty sure it’s garbage, because it kept repeating JzH a couple hundred more times before terminating without a closing parentheses.
did you try opening the image? I'm interested in seeing what random nonsense it generated xD
I tried to wait for it to finish, but after a couple hundred more repetitions of JzH it just stopped abruptly without a closing parentheses, so I think I’ve been had.
I can't get it to decode, even after correcting the base64 padding. Firefox just shows the broken image icon. My image viewer throws out the glorious log message Image format is actually "png" not "png", along with a bunch of checksum errors.
I guess, the checksum can't be correct when it's cut off, but none of my image viewing/editing software wants to look past that.
In a hex viewer, it looks like this:
Compared to a normal PNG:
I don't know the PNG spec by heart, but I guess, it doesn't look completely off the rails before it goes there...
3P53P53P53P53P53P53P53P5
That's actually a cheat code of sorts to JRR Tolkien's Lord of the Rings for SNES...
Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.
Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!
1. Be Respectful
Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.
Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.
...
2. No Illegal Content
Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.
That means:
-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals
-No CSA content or Revenge Porn
-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)
...
3. No Spam
Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.
-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.
-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.
-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers
-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.
...
4. No Porn/Explicit
Content
-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.
-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.
...
5. No Enciting Harassment,
Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts
-Do not Brigade other Communities
-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.
-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.
-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.
...
6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.
...
If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.
Also check out:
Partnered Communities:
1.Memes
10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)
Reach out to
All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker