this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2026
42 points (95.7% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14450 readers
628 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In an hourlong interview, he said his industry was downplaying the risks, which he believes include mass unemployment and bioterrorism.

By Karen Weise

Karen Weise, who has covered Microsoft since 2018, spoke with Bill Gates in his Seattle-area offices last week.

Aug. 26, 2026Updated 7:06 a.m. ET

Bill Gates, the billionaire co-founder of Microsoft, is loudly warning that artificial intelligence poses a grave threat to jobs and human life, and that urgently addressing the risks should be “the world’s top priority.”

In an hourlong interview with The New York Times last week, Mr. Gates said the tech industry was knowingly downplaying those threats because there was too much money on the line.

“In private, people who understand how good this stuff is, and how much better it’s getting, they’re very worried,” he said. But few tech executives, Mr. Gates said, are willing to publicly admit that. “They’re now saying to each other: ‘Hey, man, don’t say that. It’s bad for us — the next trillion dollars we’re trying to raise.”

On Wednesday, Mr. Gates published a nearly 6,000-word essay on his personal website laying out his concerns about A.I. and offering solutions, such as new taxes and bans. He said he was motivated to speak now because recent improvements in A.I. had far surpassed his expectations and because the industry had ignored technology milestones — like A.I.’s escaping the control of its creators or making recipes for bioweapons — that it once said would warrant more caution.

“They’re just full speed ahead and hoping that the good outweighs the bad,” he said.

Mr. Gates, 70, is the latest in a string of tech luminaries to call out the risks of A.I. as the industry spends trillions of dollars on new data centers, and as young A.I. companies edge toward some of the largest initial public offerings in history.

Mr. Gates arriving for a House committee hearing in the Jeffrey Epstein investigation in June. In an interview, he acknowledged having made mistakes.Credit...Pete Marovich for The New York Times

He is taking his stand as he emerges from an extended period of scandal. Early this year, the release of the sexual predator Jeffrey Epstein’s emails brought renewed attention to Mr. Gates’s interactions with him.

Mr. Gates had to pull out of an A.I. conference in February, and testified for six hours in June before a House committee. Disclosures of his infidelity, combined with his 2021 divorce, have also badly damaged his reputation. He acknowledged that they were all “mistakes” of his own doing.

He appears more willing to step back into the spotlight after answering every question from the House Oversight Committee. “I think people understand what I did do, what I didn’t do and that I learn when I make mistakes,” he said in the interview.

Mr. Gates conceded that he also might be a flawed messenger simply because of his vast wealth and history as Microsoft’s aggressive chief executive. In a landmark federal case, Microsoft was found in 2000 to have repeatedly abused its monopoly during his watch. (Mr. Gates left the company’s board of directors in 2020.)

While Mr. Gates avoided criticizing Microsoft or other companies by name, he argued that he was uniquely positioned to work on the A.I. issue. He is a technologist and industry insider who is no longer driven by the profit incentives of running a company, and he has spent decades addressing inequality through his philanthropic foundation.

“The irony of ‘innovation lover is scared and says we’re not ready and we’re crossing thresholds,’ maybe it’s even more poignant,” he said.

Mr. Gates said technological advances had truly stunned him three times: In 1980 when he first saw a graphical user interface, which led to the modern personal computer. In 2022 when the leaders of OpenAI came to his house to demonstrate what would soon become ChatGPT. And this year when he looked closely at the advances being made by Claude Code, Anthropic’s A.I. tool.

Coding, Mr. Gates said, is the subject he knows best, and Claude’s abilities shocked him. “The idea that now these things are in a meaningful sense better than I am is like: What the hell?” he said.

Anthropic’s Code With Claude event in May. Coding, Mr. Gates said, is the subject he knows best, and he was shocked by Claude’s abilities.Credit...Jason Henry for The New York Times

Technological breakthroughs in the past created more jobs than they eliminated, Mr. Gates said. But he is in disbelief that industry boosters say that will happen again this time.

The A.I. era is “utterly, absolutely, completely, totally different,” he said. He acknowledged that this unpopular opinion (in tech circles) was “a hell of a claim, and I’m staking everything I know — everything — saying, ‘Are you kidding?’”

He said mass job losses, if not addressed, were inevitable because A.I. would spread across the economy and leave little room for one industry to absorb the refugees from another. The biggest tech companies in the world, including Microsoft, are racing to help corporate customers adopt A.I., which could replace many workers.

Mr. Gates said that companies were just responding to market incentives, but that those incentives might conflict with what was best for society.

He proposed a new tax on A.I. use, known as a “token tax,” to make it more expensive to replace people and provide money to help those who do lose work. A token is a basic unit of A.I. computing. The idea of taxing it has gained some traction, including on Wall Street, as a way to increase the cost of using machines instead of human labor.

Some jobs, Mr. Gates said, should be prohibited from being replaced by A.I. — an idea he called “Human Reserved” — because the role is deeply personal, like a caregiver, or the people in those jobs are unlikely to find new employment.

He argued for new international agreements to set clear criteria to monitor and restrict extreme risks like bioterrorism. He said it could take only a few people with access to advanced A.I. to develop new pathogens.

He said he would happily debate anyone who argued against mandatory reviews of any A.I. system that could be weaponized to make new molecules and unleash a pandemic. Mr. Gates added that he was dumbfounded by the kind of voluntary measures that the White House and industry leaders were developing.

“Self-regulation on the most dangerous tool ever invented?” he said incredulously. “No, thanks!”

Mr. Gates said he was in a “state of shock” as to why there was not more urgency on these issues. Many of his concerns echo those raised by the Anthropic co-founder Dario Amodei, but Dr. Amodei’s warnings have put him at odds with the Pentagon, the White House and much of the tech industry.

Mr. Gates said A.I. and its dangers were, to him, as important an issue as global health. Credit...Chona Kasinger for The New York Times

“You have people attacking the person who’s the most open about the downsides,” Mr. Gates said.

(The Times has sued OpenAI and Microsoft, claiming copyright infringement of news content related to A.I. systems. The two companies have denied those claims.)

Along with global health issues, Mr. Gates vowed to make his A.I. concern part of every conversation he had with world leaders. “I only have two issues where I’m going to say, ‘Please think more about this, please care more about this,’” he said.

Mr. Gates acknowledged that he was in an odd spot: He has arguably done as much as anyone in the world to evangelize for and shape the modern computer industry. But now he is warning that the technology it is creating presents global risks.

“I don’t like bringing bad news to people, and I don’t like saying that innovation may be a net negative,” he said. “But that’s where we are.”

top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 65 points 1 week ago (4 children)

This is marketing. Same as the "breaking containment" shit and "oops our AI hacked another company!" rubbish.

If an AI from one company hacked another company they'd be suing the ever loving shit out of each other. They're not, because it's just collaborative marketing. "Our AI is so unbelievably staggeringly good now it does shit we don't even want it to do!"

Total bullshit. Gates is just taking part in it here. AI is DANGEROUS because vague reasons.

They're nearing the end of the hype train so it's perfectly fine to do marketing that is wholly negative because the consequences won't matter when the gravy train ends.

[–] Crucible@hexbear.net 25 points 1 week ago

Yup, same as Sam Altman going, 'Uh we actually need to slow down development of AI for SAFETY!' when in reality it's trying to create a screen that protects the AI bubble from the fact that even OpenAI can't afford its computation spending. They're just trying to cool the market's expectations long enough for them to set up a government bailout

[–] meatcringe@hexbear.net 16 points 1 week ago

My exact thoughts. order-of-lenin

[–] marxisthayaca@hexbear.net 13 points 1 week ago

Huggingface also gets to talk about how many models they have on file, which they used to protect against the hack.

[–] space_comrade@hexbear.net 12 points 1 week ago

AI is dangerous, but it's dangerous because of people like Bill Gates not because of any inherent danger of the technology.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 42 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Many of his concerns echo those raised by the Anthropic co-founder Dario Amodei

i.e. this is part of the grift

No, chatbots are not an existential threat, shut up.

[–] meatcringe@hexbear.net 17 points 1 week ago

“AI is more dangerous than Big Tech will admit” - Big Tech

[–] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 34 points 1 week ago (1 children)

he has spent decades addressing inequality through his philanthropic foundation.

The one that fights for private charter schools so that only the affluent have access to education? That one? I guess that is addressing inequality. From his perspective there isn't enough inequality so he's trying to ensure there is more

[–] scrungus@hexbear.net 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No, no it's the other one that promotes eugenics in the developing world

[–] BobDole@hexbear.net 14 points 1 week ago

No, no it’s the other one that’s buying up all the farmland

[–] mrfugu@hexbear.net 34 points 1 week ago

AI is like really really scary. Trust me. I’m not going to talk about environmental impacts, power grid impacts, or potential for human misuse it’s just like super duper eepy creepy all on its own! It’s definitely a god-level power that we really really shouldn’t (😉) use or continue to fund at all.

Unless the fine people providing funding want like control over man, nature, and the divine. But that’s just like way too much… unless?

[–] Rojo27@hexbear.net 31 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Says nothing about the environmental impact of the data centers being built for AI models, nor how the concerns of the communities they are being built in are being ignored. Doesn't say anything about the us of AI by law enforcement and the high error rates that can lead to dangerous confrontations between innocent people and trigger happy cop. Or how they are being used by militaries to kill people. Nothing about how many of the companies that have replaced employees with AI have had to rehire employees because AI wasn't up to snuff and has to be babied.

I know Gates is going to have the skewed views of a billionaire, but I'm kind of tired of seeing these types of stories where its warning that "AI is getting too good, we've got to get it under control!". And I have no doubts that there are models that are getting better, that's inevitable. But there are much more present and tangible issues currently, which a lot of these types of "AI is dangerous" articles/essays seem to miss.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

AI is getting too good

I don't know how journalists keep falling for this horseshit! DemocracyNow has AI doomer segments pretty regularly, and while they do talk about the environmental harms of data centers, they also give voice to this doomer nonsense. AI doomers work hand-in-glove with AI boosters to inflate the AI bubble, because both of them are saying the same thing i.e. "We are building god!"

Fuck off, no you aren't.

[–] marxisthayaca@hexbear.net 5 points 1 week ago

You can be assigned a beat and be a total rube and gullible idiot.

[–] marxisthayaca@hexbear.net 9 points 1 week ago

They say Ai is this dangerous, economic-shifting, thing; and yet, they are also shoving data centers down communities’ throats. The most stupid people on earth.

[–] Utter_Karate@hexbear.net 29 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Bill Gates also thinks that future generations will remember Bill Gates as a businessman and philantropist, so I would take what he says with a grain of salt.

[–] ElChapoDeChapo@hexbear.net 20 points 1 week ago

He'll be remembered as a philanthropist if you use the mispronunciation from that episode of It's Always Sunny

[–] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 26 points 1 week ago

who cares what that pedophile thinks?

[–] RNAi@hexbear.net 23 points 1 week ago

Who? The Epstein close friend?

[–] Sabbo@hexbear.net 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So, calling tech "dangerous" is a common form of marketing. Calling something dangerous implies that it has a great deal of potential as well as making the company "warning" you about it sound responsible. But if it were a genuine warning then the legal department would tell them to stop. This tactic is used in everything from cars to nuclear power.

[–] burlemarx@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Exactly my thoughts. I guess what he really wants is more government funding, more shareholders, more government contracts, etc. Apocalyptic marketing has been the hallmark of the AI hype.

Remember when OpenAI talked about how their internal model was dangerous when ChagGPT was still in the 2.5 version. Now we have more powerful SLMs that can run on our local desktops and we haven't seen the end of the world yet.

[–] Sabbo@hexbear.net 4 points 1 week ago

Maybe the real existential danger was the friends we made along the way

[–] JoeByeThen@hexbear.net 17 points 1 week ago

Blah blah blah, one of the richest men in the world doesn't want to be fed to the choppy boy for the torment nexus he helped build.

Loses the winner-takes-all arms race

Actually AI is so dangerous, that's why I didn't win. It's because I have a big conscience

Sour grapes sour grapes

Sure it is, Bill jagoff

[–] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 10 points 1 week ago
[–] microfiche@hexbear.net 5 points 1 week ago