The ACP is and always will be pee pee poo poo from my stinky doo doo ass.
"Actual Socialism" is when you have a literal monarchy
this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2026
89 points (97.8% liked)
Slop.
917 readers
311 users here now
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Ah yes but you have state owned slaves so that's a kind of socialism
that's why the modern USA is the most advanced socialist project on Earth. Look how massive our publicly funded slave system is!
Duginism with larouchite characteristics
Half convinced these people actually don't know how to read and get "theory" off memes and vibes.
i mean there's no way he actually believe the shit he said in the top paragraph right? how rotten is his brain to think medieval monarchies are socialism? one skim over the communist manifesto or marx would put that into the trash. this has to be ragebait
He thinks socialism is tough guys in an ordered (read: hierarchical and punitive) society, usually being semi-religious in some way, usually doing violence against some other group.
That’s like believing an elephant is a table because it has four legs. It’s just basic failure of logic
Haz is the perfect example of someone who's dumber than he think he is but smarter than other people think he is.
Oh I'm fully convinced
Don't make me tap the ~~sign~~ username
Infra-Haz has published another silly tweet
Everyone hated that
Worker co-ops? You mean like literally owning the means of production is "Liberal Insanity Shithole" 
Okay but quite a few people here would probably point out that co-ops are not actually socialism within a capitalist framework.
*Angry noises*
Yeah it's the closest thing to socialism on this list, but still not socialism lmao
Bro at least it’s more socialist than the Mughal Empire lmao
Yeah I mean REI is a worker coop that has a contentious relationship with its own labor union. They've been in a multi-year dispute with the Union only until recently I think.
Wait, what happened recently? I hadn't heard there was an update to the situation
Well my point was moot actually because they are a retail coop not a workers coop.
That doesn't seem like it should be possible even of the worker's coop sucked. You learn something new every day. I'm gonna look that up.
Edit: edited it so it sounds less like im accusing you of lying and more like im confused by this new fact.
Edit 2: Ah. REI is(/was? It's not entirely clear) apparently a consumer coop. Something like the British Coop stores or Coop Norden in Scandinavia. The customers are meant to own a share.
Oh fuck, that's right. I forgot all about that. Well ignore me then lmao! Clearly in this case, the customer isn't always right.
In retail as the number of transactions increase the rightness of the costumer approaches zero
He's engineered this tweet to get people to lose their minds over it, then he can pull someone into a debate to make a mockery out of someone. Then he's gonna say some shit like: "We're the only real party, look at our opposition!"
All of this is done to construct a desired narrative, he knows exactly what he's doing.
He is Charlie kirk.
Real socialism:
A Reuben sandwich, the movie Police Academy, twelve paperclips in a box
Liberalism:
Vaping, the color pink, your butt
your butt
😠😡😤
All you have to do is start washing your butt to accept the warm embrace of marxism
load more comments
(2 replies)
Least obvious CIA agent
You folx just don't understand the subtleties of monarcho-communism
Did he get that list from opening up a Paradox game and just clicking the Random Nation button over and over again
load more comments
(1 replies)
ol' soft hands at it again with the random word generator
Socialism of when ~~government~~ feudal monarchy does stuff and it's more socialism the more feudalism it does
Mughal India
Monarchy that was (eventually)subservient to a western capitalist enterprise, very socialist
Any existing social movement must make it their highest priority to throw out the most deluded [removed]s like this.
well of course under the Qing the Manchu were socialist because they didn't have to perform most labor (banner system?)! And the Mongols were socialist because, because all the land? was distributed to Mongols. (the latter doesn't work because the land was subdivided among an incredibly small familial group that organizationally placed 99% of mongols under them)
ottoman devșirme was socialism i mean c'mon centralized government feeding and teaching a heap of christians to be polite like the USSR did to Estonia
we should get a "fact checked by real hitlerites" emote
lol. First paragraph is completely stupid and wrong in a fresh and incomprehensible way. Second paragraph is completely correct but leftists don't want to hear that. Absolute bait post, masterful.
When I think of liberal shithole, I think of Texas or Florida. Doesn’t mean California and Sweden aren’t on the list but we all know the motivations for him naming them, and I don’t agree with said motivations so I’m not going to pretend he has any point at all.
I think it is important to point out to social democrats the monstrosities of imperialism that hold up things like Sweden and California, the Bernie types and squishies do not like to hear that the Norwegian nations are the most imperialist (per capita) on earth in the Leninist strict definition. They make the most per capita in absolute figures from foreign extraction by multinational corporations. They operate under NATO and western-aligned “freedom” that has forcibly opened markets for them. They are a complicit part of the American fascist empire, a willing vassal - and any “socialism” they achieve is chauvinistic and built on super exploitation.
But yes Haz is a reactionary weirdo. I’m not handing it to him that he’s making a good point, it’s moreso that he knows what he is saying is bullshit and has catered it expressly for ragebaiting. He sprinkled in some truth to make it sting and used a bunch of nonsense to make it incoherent and reactionary, the perfect attention maxxing strat.
load more comments
(3 replies)
You can directly trace these statements to the idea that socialism must have centralized control, and the idea that a "relatively progressive force in history" can be labeled as progressive.
As soon as you start saying "for socialism you must obey orders from above rather than harmonizing your local formation with a revolutionary movement", you open yourself up to this kind of parody.
load more comments
(1 replies)
view more: next ›