this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2026
80 points (94.4% liked)

Ask Lemmy

40666 readers
2186 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, toxicity and dog-whistling are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !uspolitics@lemmy.world


7) No Hit-and-Run questions.
Please don't delete your post for no apparent reason. If you plan on deleting a question later, say so in the post, or if you feel that you have a good reason to remove it, message a mod beforehand. It's not fair to the ones who took their time to answer, and it's not in the spirit of the community.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I’ve noticed a pattern. Every now and then, someone leaves a rude, mean, or snarky comment on one of my posts. Occasionally, out of curiosity, I’ll check their post history, and it’s almost always nothing but negativity. They never seem to have anything positive or kind to say about anything, whether it’s politics, hobbies, personal anecdotes, or whatever else. It’s just a constant stream of bitterness and hostility. After seeing so many accounts like this, it got me wondering: what do people actually get out of being like that? The idea of willingly immersing yourself in that much negativity is genuinely alien to me.

top 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Xeno@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

Perhaps it’s similar to the reasons why media outlets overwhelmingly report bad news over good news. People don’t care when things are going right. People react much more when things are going wrong.

In social media I imagine that most of the positive feedback people give takes the form of likes and upvotes, with only occasional comments, while the bulk of commentary is used for criticism and confrontation. At least in the context of doomscrolling through things like memes or political garbage. Forums where engagement itself is the norm, like philosophy or hobbies, probably get way more positive comments. But where impulsive reaction is the norm? Positivity comes in the form of thumbs up emojis, and comments are for arguing. XD

[–] tburkhol@slrpnk.net 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I know a couple of people IRL who never seem to have a positive reaction to anything. The proverbial "every silver lining has a cloud" people: got a raise? just means more taxes. Sunny day? skin cancer. Cloudy day? cold and mud.

For the particular people I know, it seems like a self-esteem thing - like they don't feel themselves worthy of happiness, so they have to preemptively destroy anything positive. Or maybe just be contrarian to prove they're smarter than everyone else. It's exhausting.

[–] AskewLord@piefed.social 5 points 1 day ago

the taxes think is so weird and stupid.

[–] mrmaplebar@fedia.io 3 points 1 day ago

Internet trolls and edge lords: too angry to live and let live, too cowardly to lash out in person.

[–] Kennystillalive@feddit.org 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

Different reasons, I asume. Here are my 3 favourites:

  • Attention seeking through rage bait. They want attention be it possitive or negative, the easiest is to be negative and to be a troll. Way too many people fall for it and give them their vanity when responding to them. Thus, remember never feed the troll.

  • Negative emotions are way more intense than possitive emotions and in social media most of the time they are pushed harder as more people interact with negative content. That can lead for younger people to feel like they need to be more negative than they should.

  • They are struggling themselves and don't have help and don't know they are struggling or know they are and just want others to struggle to.

Disclaimer, I'm not a psychologist, but these are my assumptions.

[–] natedog526@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I'd also throw in the anonymity aspect as well.

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 1 points 1 day ago

Rage also fosters engagement. There’s likely corporate financed ragers out there for engagement purposes. Just like brand defenders/promoters.

[–] MufinMcFlufin@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

While I don't think this applies to many of the people being described here, I also feel like those of us who don't really use much social media other than to reach out on public platforms to complain to companies could appear to be a bundle of pure negativity.

[–] shneancy@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

i much prefer doing positive attention baiting. on tiktok especially i like going to small artists' channels and saying nice things about their art (that i do mean), they reply quite often :)

sometimes i even get an amazing treat in return! - more art! not always, but sometimes, i notice artists posting more after i visit their channel a few times. It really makes me feel this comfortable warmth in my chest

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I refer to it as "sowing karma". I don't believe actual karma exists. However, a small positive act can create an avalanche of other, small positive acts.

Whenever I do someone a favour, particularly random people. If they try or offer to pay me back, I tell them to pay it forward. I've no idea how many do, but even if it's just 1 or 2, then the world is that bit better for all of us.

Keep being awesome!

[–] Zarobi@aussie.zone -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That is karma. You create more good in the world by small acts of kindness, and it spreads. The same way that bad karma spreads. It's commonly confused that karma is a magic thing where you get rewarded for kindness, but usually it's only indirectly if ever

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Karma is generally associated with some form of personal scoreboard. E.g. if you have bad luck it's either because you did something bad, or a "due" your share of good luck.

Karma is a lie, but it's a useful lie (like truth or mercy) I explicitly know that my good deeds won't get rewarded I do it because it can help make the world a better place. If I'm lucky, that will loop around to help me down the road, but I don't expect it.

[–] Zarobi@aussie.zone -1 points 1 day ago

Understood. I was just letting you know that you were actually more in line with the original concept of karma, from Buddhist and Hindu religious beliefs, which has nothing to do with a personal scoreboard or rewards.

[–] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de -1 points 1 day ago

The way you misspell "positive" is causing me to have some negative reactions to you

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago

I think they don't know how to be anything else. Probably grew up with parents like that and had no other role models.

Some people are just nasty little bastards, and they gain pleasure from ruining other people's days and lives.

Sometimes there's some background reasons of anger or unhappiness causing them to lash out. Sometimes they're just cunts.

[–] Zizzy@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Im not sure its willingness. These people are all around irl too. They just cannot be happy about anything, ever and mist spread negativity.

[–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Whoever downvoted you just had a realization.

[–] spittingimage@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I knew someone IRL like that. Genuinely nice guy face-to-face, but never passed up the chance to take a swipe at someone online. As time went by his conduct and attitudes made it clearer and clearer that he's dealing with undiagnosed mental health issues.

[–] systemglitch@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Mental illness if it is just lashing out and undermining others for a temporary boost of one's own superiority.

[–] Zarobi@aussie.zone 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Some people just enjoy arguments, it's a thrill of dopamine to be a jerk. Being evil or bad or hurting others emotionally is like a forbidden fruit, I used to do the same thing as a teenager.

When you see a person who has a post history like that, I'd strongly suggest using the block button. It will make your experience much nicer.

[–] AskewLord@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

some of us enjoy arguments because it's the best way to learn and grow.

you can't learn or grow without friction.

and yes, some people avoid friction as much as possible and view it negatively. they often feel the same way about physical exercise because they think it's nothing but pain.

[–] Zarobi@aussie.zone 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There's a difference between:

  • Challenging your ideas and beliefs to better define them and be exposed to new concepts and ways of thinking.
  • Needless toxicity filled with manipulative fallacies to spread the maximum amount of negativity possible.

It's usually pretty obvious which is happening. In the second case, there's no benefit to engaging with them, because their goal is not a discussion. Most often, they'll deliberately twist your words or "misunderstand" you to frame your words in the worst possible light, just to get one more reaction, or a bit more anger out of you. Like a leech that's hard to get off.

[–] AskewLord@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

average people don't see that difference. they perceive any challenge to anything, including personal preferences of how they take their coffee, as a personal attack.

and in the second case, they also think you are doing that to them.

[–] Dookieman12@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago

Some people are just fucking assholes. Or they're a 16-year-old edge lord. Never forget that high schoolers and children FAR outnumber adults on the internet, and of those adults, assholes, dickheads, and morons comprise the vast majority of them.

[–] pubblebub@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

Angry, powerless people can use their interactions with others on the internet as an outlet, to correct views they see as threatening, or just to lash out at people they perceive as 'the problem', and/or a way to feel they have a voice/are making some difference when they don't get enough opportunity to do this offline.

Separately, trolls just like to mess with people for a basic sense of power and entertainment, and to feel like they matter, again when they otherwise don't have ways to feel that offline.

Paid trolls/bots can also express negative views either about specific topics, or on specific communities, if these are targeted as going against some political or commercial goal. These may also intersperse red herring interactions that are not to do with the explicit goal to make the account appear more like a regular person's.

It can be hard to tell which is which, but these all exist, and all can manifest in a pattern of seemingly inconsistent but predominantly negative posts/comments.

[–] JollyG@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

A lot (most) social media is optimized for engagement which is really just another way if saying it rewards things that get attention with more attention. On mainstream platforms that is largely driven by content curation algorithms, but even simple up and down votes have the same effect.

It turns out humans are more sensitive to bad things than good things. We care more about risk or punishment than we do about reward, more about injustice than justice, etc. So we pay more attention to bad outcomes, which means social media amplifies bad things more than good things.

As far as personal posters go, I think there are people who desire engagement and have basically trained themselves to be as negative as possible because that negativity is rewarded by more engagement.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago

man from the title I was like. um if your in the us there is a lot to be negative about. but hobbies and such that makes no sense.

[–] Willy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

They’re still looking for the violets

[–] nullspace@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm actually a gremlin who gains sustenance when other people are mad on the internet.

[–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I hope you have a horrible day! Gremlins suck!

snarky comments, imo, are the results of people assuming they are thinking out of the box. initially, it could have been done without malice, just pure i'll up you one better thinking.

as others have said, there's also that factor that the person is a-d-d/k-s-p/socially-challenged.

in times like these, i'll advise that tending to your mental health is always a good practice.

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 1 day ago

People tend to only know their own lived experience and think that they're "normal". Hurt people hurt people, privileged people have massive blind spots. Everybody judges, it's how we learn. And some people are grumpy.

[–] dontbelievethis@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because they are angry about something else and use online to let of steam without repercussions.

[–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

And who better to take that out on than a confident highly sexual woman who is comfortable with herself?

[–] AskewLord@piefed.social 0 points 1 day ago

it feels good.

it creates a feedback loop of validation and encouragement.

[–] fizzle@quokk.au -1 points 1 day ago

Our lizard brains don't care about positivity or negativity - any kind of engagement produces dopamine.

Maybe it's just a conditioned response. It takes more effort to say something constructive than it does to be snarky.

[–] daggermoon@piefed.world -1 points 1 day ago

misery loves company

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There are people like that IRL, but in my experience it’s more like Eeyore than outright hostility. Eeyore personalities exist.

Good odds, when confronted face to face, the hostility we all see online would be dialed back. There’s no real confrontation to the online confrontation.

[–] Rothe@piefed.social 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 1 points 1 day ago

I’m sad that you don’t know this reference.

[–] myrmidex@belgae.social 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

My first answer is a song by Slipknot, but I'm guessing they meant the Winnie the Pooh character 😀

[–] amio@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

[Nice, this place is really welcoming, my bad]

[–] snoons@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Maybe they're jealous that no ones chugging their womenade.

Cereally tho, I know what and where to search so I'll look it up best I can. There are probably multiple answers though depending on their personal history.

[–] Dookieman12@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago

Yeah, i hate it when people won't drink my piss