this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2026
266 points (91.0% liked)

Science Memes

20722 readers
853 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago

Aside from the loss meme, this depends on unaccounted for factors:

  • C: it's windy
  • D: rope is tied
  • B: chopper broke loose
[–] Avicenna@programming.dev 14 points 1 day ago

The loss virus is only triggered when the picture makes no sense. So this one took a while

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 205 points 2 days ago (4 children)

~~Why are there two images for B, C and~~

goddammit.

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 27 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] ThatGuy46475@lemmy.world 82 points 2 days ago (4 children)
[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 25 points 2 days ago (2 children)

This one was still over my head, but you gave me just enough to look it up. For anyone similarly confused.

[–] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 24 points 2 days ago

I commend you for making it this far on the internet without encountering it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AmyAye@nord.pub 19 points 2 days ago

Fucking ell...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Derpenheim@lemmy.zip 13 points 2 days ago

Im glad my own path to despair has been walked by others.

[–] edible_funk@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

Oh goddammit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DragonAce@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fuck!!! It took me waaaaay too long to get this shit. I'm at a loss as to why I didn't see it immediately.

[–] hypeerror@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

Why would they even put D ... ah fuck!

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.dbzer0.com 64 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Allero@lemmy.today 20 points 2 days ago
[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 97 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] LemmyFeed@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago

Fuuuuuuuck.

[–] Aneb@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The answer is D because there's no indication that the rope is untied. The helicopter starts his trajectory but loses control and spins out and crashes, this is the hidden frame

[–] davetortoise@reddthat.com 4 points 2 days ago

Sounds like that could lead to loss. Of life.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 42 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (6 children)

[For people wanting the answerthis was the subject of a Veritasium video.

for people who don't want to click the linkIt's B.

[–] tyler@programming.dev 13 points 2 days ago (13 children)
[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 2 days ago (9 children)

What's the story? What'd they do?

[–] Djehngo@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago (7 children)

I hate this so much,

Someone is mentioned on Lemmy and there is always a drive by comment saying don't support X or X is a bad person with no context whatsoever. No mention of what specifically they are accused of doing/saying, no way to figure out if that clashes with your values or not, no documentation etc.

And subjectively it feels like half the time I research why this might be true it's debatable at best, I assume because if there was compelling evidence the person doing the drive by would have linked it.

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Don't support u/Agent641

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] turdas@suppo.fi 27 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Sold out to some venture capital firm.

[–] tyler@programming.dev 15 points 2 days ago

I didn’t know he did that. He was shit long before that. Here’s my comment:

He created fake science experiments to sell products and slipped them into normal videos, like the video where he claimed wet wipes are flushable, then created a fake experiment “proving” they were flushable. He’s incredibly untrustworthy and also, not a scientist! He’s an art major or business, can’t remember which.

[–] timestatic@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago

So what? If he gets a good offer for what he built, why shouldn't he be allowed to sell his own channel. His content is still good. I prefer independent creators but he's in full right to sell of what he made. He doesn't owe the community content or to stay independent

[–] LytiaNP@lemmy.today 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Personally I've noticed topics covered by smaller content creators, explaining almost the exact same thing (minus maybe a few details like some random guy's age), uploaded a few weeks before, and then suddenly Veritasium decides to cover the topic with basically the exact same info over a longer time span.

Not to mention the clickbait titles and thumbnails, less focus on the technical side of topics and more on the emotional/personal side, and the whole selling out to private equity thing.

[–] Hupf@feddit.org 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tyler@programming.dev 9 points 2 days ago (7 children)

He created fake science experiments to sell products and slipped them into normal videos, like the video where he claimed wet wipes are flushable, then created a fake experiment “proving” they were flushable. He’s incredibly untrustworthy and also, not a scientist! He’s an art major or business, can’t remember which.

[–] KoalaUnknown@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago (7 children)

According to Wikipedia

In 2004, Muller graduated from Queen's University in Kingston, Ontario, with a Bachelor of Applied Science in Engineering Physics. Muller moved to Australia to study film-making; however, he instead enrolled for a PhD in physics education research from the University of Sydney, which he completed in 2008 with the thesis, Designing Effective Multimedia for Physics Education.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Do we have to worry about the loss of ve loss ity?

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 22 points 2 days ago (2 children)

those are actually not helicopters those are spherical cows

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] chunes@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] caradenada@feddit.cl 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes, but then it wouldn't be flying "to the right" as it says.

[–] StumblingWasabi@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If the helicopter is suspended in the air, it's flying. To the right is simply a frame of reference, if I'm driving to the left then it appears as though the helicopter is going to the right, so the speed can be 0.

[–] starelfsc2@sh.itjust.works 1 points 13 hours ago

Now this is the kind of technically right I can get behind.

[–] SpongyAneurysm@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yes, but not one where we would typically consider something to be 'flying horizontally'.

load more comments
view more: next ›