ryannathans

There are 25 rail passenger casualties for every 100 collisions with a heavy vehicle at a crossing, of which there are 14609 collisions with trucks in the US database over a ten year period to 2021

Do you have a source this is how it works in america? Isn't it based on census data where people choose how they identify?

Fuck that's crazy, its lethal dose by mouth is LSD's standard dose by mouth 😂

Over an 8 year period there were 49 90 degree rail accidents with trucks at crossings in Australia

These models tested are so old they're from the era where they couldn't pass a math test or count letters in words

At the same time there's a whole bunch of idiots running around thinking they know everything just because they paid the university tax and got a piece of paper

Imagine someone of average intelligence, then 50% of people are dumber than that and maybe 10% are functionally equivalently intelligent. Maybe 40% of the population are switched on, now throw in some politics and wildly different upbringing and life experience

Interesting how they're unacceptable for cars but the norm for trains and they don't even have seatbelts

How do bench seats kill people?

Well answered in your duplicate post https://nord.pub/c/linuxquestions/p/267003/what-s-the-fundamental-difference-between-sudo-and-doas

For an LLM comparison, this is what I get from haiku

sudo is older, more complex, and feature-rich, while doas is newer, simpler, and security-focused.

Core distinctions:

Code size & complexity: doas has roughly 700 lines of code versus sudo's 100,000+ lines, making doas easier to audit and maintain.

Configuration: sudo uses the complex sudoers file with intricate syntax; doas uses a simpler doas.conf file that's more straightforward to read and write.

Security philosophy: doas was designed with security-first principles, minimizing potential attack surface. sudo accumulated features over decades, increasing complexity and potential vulnerabilities.

Feature set: sudo has advanced features like session recording, plugins, authentication caching, and detailed logging. doas is minimalist—it handles the essential privilege escalation task without extras.

Adoption: sudo is ubiquitous across Linux and Unix systems. doas is less common but gaining traction, particularly on OpenBSD (where it originated) and among security-conscious users.

Performance: doas is faster and lighter, while sudo carries more overhead.

In practice, doas works well for straightforward privilege escalation needs, while sudo is better if you need advanced features or broader compatibility.

Is it chlorinated? Peroxide would break down the chloramine