this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2026
203 points (98.1% liked)

Ask Lemmy

39918 readers
2177 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, toxicity and dog-whistling are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

More and more mainstream analysts are identifying the coming AI crash, which is a good indication that it will happen soon.

So, what happens to all the data centers? They are already built but probably very expensive to maintain. Will many of them just be abandoned? Bought up by cloud computing companies? Scammers? Crypto miners? Can they be parted out and sold off piecemeal?

Will they be put to some productive use, or just become massive e-waste sites left to the locals to deal with?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mecen@lemmy.ca 7 points 23 hours ago

All this hardware is essentially worthless other than AI

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

They will just turn all the empty space inside into detention centers and keep all of us locked up.

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

If they’re already operational when that happens, likely sold off to cloud hyper scalers on the cheap. That or they’ll be turned into warehouses.

Nothing half done will just be abandoned and the land sold.

[–] Bieren@lemmy.today 18 points 1 day ago

Spirit Halloween gonna have some massive sales.

[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Hopefully, for the CEOs and people who made them happen,

[–] axx@slrpnk.net 1 points 19 hours ago (2 children)
[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

I'd argue that "burning the guillotine" can happen after it makes its comeback, but desperate times call for desperate measures.

[–] ParadoxSeahorse@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

The worst punishment anyone could inflict on those who govern and police us today would be to compel them to live in a society in which everything they’ve done is regarded as embarrassing

[–] Nouvellalia@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

World's
Biggest
LAN Party!

[–] Psiczar@aussie.zone -1 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

AI isn’t going away, there may be some consolidation of providers and right sizing of costs but AI is here to stay. Too many big companies have invested too much for it to fail.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 5 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

The operating costs of AI are prohibitively expensive even by the standards of US military budgets, and they are not the utility we were promised. Companies were told they could replace their entire workforce with AI and not only is that not true but now the subscription costs are going up.

It doesn't matter how much consolidating you do the product still isn't compelling and it's still expensive as hell to operate.

[–] Redfugee@lemmy.world 0 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Anthropic is expected to post a profit next quarter, it may prohibitively expensive to run but that doesn't mean it can't be profitable. But who knows, maybe they won't.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 0 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I read somewhere that for every $1 they're taking in in cash they're spending $100 in operating costs. If they charge the amount of money they would need to charge in order to actually have net income they wouldn't have any customers.

[–] Redfugee@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

We'll see if they post a profit or not but if they do then your source was probably an AI hallucination.

[–] Psiczar@aussie.zone 0 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I’m not saying changes aren’t coming, if they can’t make a profit off it then they’ll need to adapt or die. So it will either get more expensive or more efficient, but I don’t believe the bubble will burst and there will suddenly be a fire sale on cheap data centres or their hardware.

[–] fishy@lemmy.today 2 points 16 hours ago

The issue is really the use cases for AI have been way overblown. The AI companies sold it as an employee replacer. "It'll cost pennies on the dollar, have better accuracy, and doesn't need time off!" That's not actually what it is though. Companies are coming to terms with AI being more expensive, less accurate, and dumb.

A piece of software I use at work is a great example and they barely oversold the capabilities. The software has a built in AI assistant which is pretty good at pointing you in the right direction to get the result you want. Then some genius realized it could also pull report data, so they removed some metric options from the reports and now I have to spend significantly longer prompting the AI to pull the metrics I want in a usable format. This is also far more computing power. So they decided to let you link other AI agents to their software so you could use another bigger model for "better results" (they don't want to pay for all that AI themselves). Nobody bit, nobody linked to another AI because nobody wants to pay more. They're quietly adding those metrics back to the reports now.

[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

When its really AI and turns into something mature and clearly useful I will use it. Until they come up with real AI I will continue to point and laugh.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

A boom in local AI as people buy the crazy expensive video cards for pennies on the dollar for home usage?

[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Those gpu's are not useful as video cards.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I said for local AI, I didnt say for gaming.

[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

As long as you want a high wattage server running the electric bill up.

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Virtvirt588@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, these cards will most likely be in pieces rather than reused by people.

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

It's also just that local AI is not worth the time and energy unless you're a prick with too much money and incoherent ideology

[–] Senal@programming.dev 2 points 19 hours ago (2 children)
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I think that means a dictator with a speech impediment.

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 16 hours ago

I like the joke

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (2 children)

There's a few people who are like:

  • AI bad, cause environmental, capitalism, and training data being based on spyware
  • but if I run local AI, those magically all stop being true, because I think it hard enough
[–] Senal@programming.dev 2 points 15 hours ago

Ah, yeah, I've seen that.

There are also people who want to run locally for other reasons as well.

Privacy being a big one, but there are others.

I'm not sure what the ratios are though.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Wouldn't that be an inconsistent ideology?

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Senal@programming.dev 2 points 15 hours ago

Can be synonymous, isn't always.

Though my question was about what you thought rather than the word choice.

[–] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 5 points 1 day ago

Most of them aren't even built yet.

[–] Alvaro@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Get ready for the 2040 internet trend "spending the night in an abandoned data center"

load more comments (2 replies)

My doom scenario: They will become low security prisons/manufacturing factories.
Or Company Housing to go along with the Company Store where you will always be short 1 Company Buck to buy that half loaf of day old white bread....same thing, really.

[–] Asafum@lemmy.world 106 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Apparently the US government is looking to give a massive bailout under the guise of "public partnership" so the public will pay for them and then corporations will get to use them and not pay us more than likely. They'll be put to use, we'll pay for them to take our jobs. It's really the best situation possible...

/Wrist

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] mlg@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The ones being built or planned to be built will have to be sold off.

Probably not abadndoned, but land owner changing several hands in what is essentially someone buying a vacant lot. Maybe a handful will reuse any existing building already made, but most will be used for something new.

The existing ones will start their fight to the lowest market price which will probably cause many to either sell to a different cloud provider or change hardware to something more profitable.

None of the electronic hardware will go to waste because there will always be a demand for it, even if they sell it off at a loss. But any permanent fixtures like industrial cabling, ventilation, piping, etc probably will be wasted.

There's still no guarantee on whether it'll implode or just slowly deflate though. The natural assumption would be that the post IPO pricing will completely wreck sales and value, but they could easily move to an enterprise vendor lock scenario where they can charge whatever they want due to tech stack deals like how MSFT runs teams.

Remember, they'll do anything in their power to keep the pumping going, even if it involves tax bailouts.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 67 points 2 days ago (11 children)

Survielllance centers for all the data being stolen off your smartphone and flock cameras.

If anyone thinks I'm wrong, they're completely blind to what's going on and their future plan.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com 11 points 2 days ago (15 children)

mainstream analysts are identifying the coming AI crash

If so many people /experts are expecting a crash, the crash chances will be more and more included in the price. So far, I don't see that at all.

[–] amelia@feddit.org 3 points 21 hours ago

Also, I don't think the crash is going to be what people here seem to expect. It's not like AI is going to die and just go away. The hype will just slow down and some companies will probably die. But its not like the technology will vanish and the hardware will be useless. Datacenters will still be used.

[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 3 points 23 hours ago

Its more like the dotcom bubble if the president was also clearly taking bribes and had significant interest is picking winners.

Some AI companies are going to keep going providing the marginal value that they do. Just some of them will lose.

Place your bets but the house wins

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›