Just another terminally online ML ignoring material conditions and doing the woke scolding that libs love to do.
zbyte64
joined 2 years ago
Go read what Turing proposed, it is a lot more complex then how it is often parroted. There are many more tests that the latest models would not pass, like explaining poetry (that it was not trained on)
A simulation that isn't aware that it is a simulation is not self-aware, which is a qualitative difference from what is being simulated. Consciousness isn't like some rom you can emulate.
I meam that's how it was after the founding of the USA. See the sedition act.
We have Facebook ...
We wouldn't even call it AI anything then. The whole framing as it is now is to undermine creative work. It's hard to imagine how it would even remotely resemble what it is now, a cold reading con.
Do you think Musk is making good faith arguments, and if so, what are they?
Ehh, the devil is in the details. Most DAC techniques requires more energy to capture the CO2 then the energy used to produce the CO2. This particular site might not have that issue, the article doesn't say, but they are pumping the CO2 underground to be stored. Which sounds a lot like phracking... (I doubt they are pumping the CO2 into the rocks as a gas)
The concept of "kill line" is incompatible with such a view point.
Didn't we fight a cold war over this? The Soviets wanted a top down internet and it was more expensive and less capable
view more: next ›
Sure, and how do you know your thoughts are your own? Like if you have to defend your position by questioning the nature of reality then you got bigger problems.