zbyte64

joined 2 years ago
[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 4 points 1 day ago

Apparently they meant we didn't do enough to convince others. Here I thought they meant we all share blame because we "consent" to being governed in this manner.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 5 points 1 day ago

"The start menu demonstrates we can port all our essential frontend code to React Native. Today we announce a new translation layer that runs C# as react native code. There is no technical reason to do this which is why we had AI write it."

  • MS in 2026
[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

That or the school shootings are so common the lone wolves are starting to look for more creative ways to grab headlines

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 34 points 2 days ago (10 children)

What is it with magicians and Epstein, there's also David Copperfield

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 5 points 4 days ago

Damn. Americans jail even more people and still have a lower satisfaction....

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Somewhat glad my grandpa, a WW2 vet isn't around to see it.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 4 points 4 days ago

I must have missed that episode of Sesame Street. Could you link to it?

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 4 points 4 days ago

Blaming voters for how they vote is like blaming the weather when the forecaster got it wrong. We handed Harris an unprecedented amount of money and attention but her team made the wrong predictions on what would get people to vote. We can continue to blame misinformed voters and keep losing or we can learn a different lesson.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I seriously doubt people are reading this far and confirmed by none of our comments have gotten an up vote this far down. And again, if what you are saying is obvious to all then there's no need to comment further if you are appealing to an audience. I think this has more to do with being in control (as evidence by trying to always enforce the boundaries of the conversation even when you yourself violate those same boundaries).

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 1 points 4 days ago (2 children)

If it is as transparent as you say then you wouldn't have the need to comment any further. So why did you?

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (4 children)

Interesting, I didn't accuse you of being emotional just that you have emotional needs. Everyone has emotional needs. Nonviolent Communication is a great tool for disentangling judgements from needs; for example, calling me dishonest speaks to a need for integrity.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (6 children)

Yeah, I wasn't asking for your professional opinion on gAI but why you feel the need to attack people's professional reputation when it can only detract from your argument. I have no intention of debating someone who levels such insults but I am happy to talk about the emotional needs around such actions.

 

A critical and funny critique of an AI written song.

view more: next ›