zbyte64

You said it's not open to debate and I agreed to move on but now you're debating the point. I guess you really do plan on lecturing voters until democracy is saved. Funny, I would say such an approach is like chasing a rainbow. After all that happened, you think voters can be reasoned to a better position? Tell me again how unrealistic voters are.

A bike adds to the fun of dodging a giant laser by dashing from one shade island to another.

Technically it is open if you're paying in Chinese Yuan 😂

Being gay is now optional, the crimes part is not

If you don't even debate whether there should have been a primary after a statement like that then okay, let's say you're right about voters, then what? How does this lesson inform your actions going forward?

Because at least with my perspective the goal is to get better leadership to win more voters over. With your perspective what are we doing exactly? Lecturing voters? Waiting for more faces to be eaten?

You are right that is how voters act, to expect otherwise is to excuse leadership that refuses to grapple with that reality.

The main thing is that you know better then the consultants the Democrats hired who said it would be okay. Does that make their leadership sound any more capable?

Let's be real, you had to be bad at your job to loose that race. It's pathetic we're making excuses for our "leaders" when they led us down this path for so long. Still would vote for he again though .

Maybe not on the US but the bases it has surrounding Iran and definitely would use them in Ukraine.

Yes, so you should ask for a big discount.

The best is yet to come!

Or dispose of evidence.