this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2026
48 points (68.2% liked)

Unpopular Opinion

8987 readers
4 users here now

Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!


How voting works:

Vote the opposite of the norm.


If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.



Guidelines:

Tag your post, if possible (not required)


  • If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
  • If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].


Rules:

1. NO POLITICS


Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.


2. Be civil.


Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Please also refrain from gatekeeping others' opinions.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...


Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.


5. No trolling.


This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.


6. Defend your opinion


This is a bit of a mix of rules 4 and 5 to help foster higher quality posts. You are expected to defend your unpopular opinion in the post body. We don't expect a whole manifesto (please, no manifestos), but you should at least provide some details as to why you hold the position you do.



Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JonsJava@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You have been reported for trolling.

Please follow the rules, and defend your opinion, or I will be forced to remove the post.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 71 points 1 week ago

that better be an unpopular opinion 😠

[–] Carnelian@lemmy.world 57 points 1 week ago

I’d steal directly from their wallet if I had the opportunity

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 33 points 1 week ago

Popular opinion: Good

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That isn't unpopular its delusional.

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] arin@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Exactly! Isn't that great?

I love stealing from shit companies that objectively make life, this world, and humanity shit.

I won't ever steal from a person

But companies that lie, steal, cheat, and try ruining everything to get an extra dollar for the CEO? All is fair, the more the better, fuck you for ruining the world.

I know right,

live stealing from corporations. the steal from us all the time. this barely dents the balance

[–] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That sounds like something you would say! 😀

[–] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Right? I think this user is hilarious, and this post is definitely on brand.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Hello_there@fedia.io 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Op's other opinion: you should tip your landlord

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Bluegrass_Addict@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 week ago (5 children)

factually not correct.

what is 'being stolen' exactly?

Nothing is being taken from them, they just aren't getting everything they planned on. that is not theft. just like piracy isn't theft since nothing is physically being taken or lost.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Nope! Factually and objectively wrong, no opinion involved.

If it isn't connected to the internet, it isn't using any hosted services. The "stealing" argument, while still wrong, can only be argued if using their hosted services.

This claim is the same as claiming it is stealing if you don't turn on and use a TV, despite owning one.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (6 children)

from what I'm aware of.

modern TVs are sold at a loss because they then profit of your data.

if that agreement was explicit, I would consider "not connecting it to the Internet" stealing, but a good stealing.

but it isn't explicit, so it is more like you pritecting yourself from data theft

[–] Atherel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

odern TVs are sold at a loss because they then profit of your data

I strongly doubt that. Maybe they sell at a lower margin to keep competitive, but they'd never sell at a loss. Okay, on paper maybe because they know exactly how to tune those numbers. But in the end, they make profit.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Yeah this is a bait post.

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 10 points 1 week ago

I wasn't going to connect ut ti the internet already. You don't need to convince further

[–] Bad_Ideas_In_Bulk@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

"Stealing" from advertisers is a moral imperative.

[–] homes@piefed.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This literally made me start laughing. Hilarious!

[–] 5715@feddit.org 5 points 1 week ago

Don't stop.

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago

I'd consider it to be protecting my own right to privacy; but if you really want to frame it as stealing: I'm glad to be doing so. I'd even say stealing from these companies is a moral imperative.

Are you doing your part? Or have you spread your cheeks for corporate America?

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Siding with big tech is beneath you, SatansMaggotyCumFart.

[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Doubt it. The OP actively makes Lemmy and the fediverse a worse and more toxic community.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

This is the most unhinged take I have ever heard

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 6 points 1 week ago

So fucking what?

[–] keksbaecker@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (3 children)
[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 3 points 1 week ago

SmartTVs are kinda subsidized by the fact that TV manufacturers can sell user data. They would be expensive if they couldn't do that.

[–] scytale@piefed.zip 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's probably the reasoning that the TV's price is subsidized by the ads they push on the platform. And even if true, I doubt they will pull the ads if they sell it for the "actual" price.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 6 points 1 week ago
[–] Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

I might agree with you if it was possible to buy a modern TV that didn't have any smart features, but since you can't the only way to get a TV that acts as just a TV is to never connect it to the internet. In addition, if the manufacturer actually cared about requiring me to connect it to the internet to spy on me they would have made me sign some contract to that effect before I purchased it. It's not my fault if they don't profit off my purchase if I don't use it the way they want; I'm not the one who set the price.

[–] sxt@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Real "The law is the law" type behavior

OP understood the community assignment

[–] Chivera@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Stealing is cool 😎

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 5 points 1 week ago

I would agree if the manufacturers were upfront about data collection being a payment for the device usage.

But they hide it so deep in their legal text how is anyone reasonably support to know. Plus if they really needed the data they could make it not turn on without internet.

Good, smart TVs are cancer. I don't have one, never intend to have one.

[–] socsa@piefed.social 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't remember when SMCF's ragebait era officially started, but I'm here for it.

load more comments (1 replies)

I know Right.

I sure love stealing from corporations. hell yeah, stealing from them is good.

[–] anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 week ago

If I fast forward through commercials on my dvr, am I stealing from media broadcasters too?

If I close my eyes while riding the bus and never see the bus adverts, am I stealing from advertisers?

There's never a guarantee advertisements are seen by target audiences - especially when they're being shown on private devices. If more people than expected are able to avoid an advertisement, thats not theft, that's just poor investment.

[–] apftwb@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)
[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

This makes me curious:

Would you consider using 3rd party ink cartridges to be stealing from printer manufacturers??

Similar scenario: the printer is sold at a loss, with the expectation that you overspend on proprietary ink. If you don't buy their ink, you're not allowing them to recoup their losses; 'stealing' the profits they expected to make from you.

[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 3 points 1 week ago (14 children)

What if my home doesn't have internet access?

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Sheldan@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (5 children)
load more comments
view more: next ›