this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2026
314 points (90.9% liked)

Science Memes

20472 readers
2035 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] stabby_cicada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 104 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)
[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

Also I depicted Cool hats

[–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 54 points 2 months ago (2 children)

*Fewer humans, and that would actually solve most of our problems, it's just that we need to be more specific about which humans we get rid of. Specifically billionaires/unchecked capitalists.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

There were fewer humans a century ago. and there were no human caused ecological crisis back then.

it isn't the number of people really, but the exploitative economic system they use.

/s!!! /s!!!!

btw, humans managed the extinction of megafauna when where were around a million humans 10 thousand years ago.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 31 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No human caused ecological crises during the height of industrialization? Sure bud.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

sorry. I'll take all the responsibility of forgetting the "/s".

thought it was clearly sarcasm, because duh.

carry on.

was trying to make it a clearly obvious point against that argument.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Sarcasm is dead and .ml killed it.

[–] MerryJaneDoe@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Deadpan sarcasm doesn't translate well from a verbal medium to a written medium.

Unless you're in an echo chamber....

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

wouldn't say echochambers are immune, maybe communities where users know each other. like if anyone who knew me read it, they would immediately realize it's sarcasm. but without any context, sarcasm is indistinguishable from a stupid idea.

wonder how many times I've agreed with a nazi, because he was being sarcastic and I didn't realize.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Your username should have given me a clue

[–] mrbutterscotch@feddit.org 1 points 2 months ago

I honestly believe that the more extreme .ml users will be chasing off new users coming to the fediverse, since they have the largest communities.

Which is a shame.

[–] Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml -5 points 2 months ago
[–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

There were also infinitely fewer people concerned about humans' ecological impact and no effective way to change that. Now we have millions and millions of people all over the world worried about it and we are all interconnected via the internet. We caused a mass extinction with a million of us in disparate tribes, just imagine what we could accomplish if all 8 billion of us actually worked together toward changing the world for the better! Unfortunately we're still stuck in stupid tribes, and the most powerful tribe that controls every aspect of life in every other tribe is obsessed with destroying the Earth at a never-ending, ever-increasing pace. Here in America, our ruling class is literally trying to bring about the apocalypse. But naw, getting rid of them couldn't possibly lead to any kind of benefit, we better let them burn it all down in the name of line-go-up 🙄🙄🙄

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 months ago

Ha ha you got me in the first half there

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 25 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Meme is accurate. I am weird and misanthropic.

[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, I was going to say that there is nothing inherently illogical about the misanthropic person, despite what the meme implies.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I just wonder if non-misanthropes have actually met people or if they’ve got this idealized view of them.

[–] Ooops@feddit.org 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Most people are not that observant and really self-centered.

From there just a little variance in the spectrum ranging from "I think as highly about others as I think about me" to "they are all inferior to me" can make a massive difference on how someone sees and interacts with the world. And barely anything of it is based on the actual reality of other people.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

It’s not that I feel I’m better. It’s that I know how awful I am and how little variance there really is to humanity.

If people are like me then they’re pretty awful.

[–] NotEasyBeingGreen@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Most people are really interesting if you get to know them.

I definitely don't understand most people, but that doesn't mean I dislike them. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Lots of things are really interesting if you get to know them.

[–] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 16 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

Just uhh, don't look at all the things we're doing for infinite growth. The beef industry is totally a normal thing to inflict on an environment

-Malthus, apparently

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Well we needed something to replace all the native ruminants we brutally slaughtered.

[–] joostjakob@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago
[–] Tyrq@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If we're a part of nature, everything we do is also a part of nature, it's just that we have the capacity to understand the consequences of humanity's actions on the rest of nature

[–] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 8 points 2 months ago

I mean if you want to generalize, mass extinction events are also an occurrence in nature even when we're not involved. I think the hope of environmental endeavors is to try and preserve as much as we can, which our current population growth and desired goals of wealth just will not do.

[–] Sunsofold@lemmings.world 15 points 2 months ago

Real talk? Missing the third group that groups the other two under the same heading for political expediency. The bottom group is essentially never sincerely grouped with the top.

[–] Hylactor@sopuli.xyz 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Connection between the human development index (HDI) and total fertility rate (TFR)

The human development index has three components -GDP per capita is one of them, life expectancy is the second and the education level - the third. As all these factors are negatively correlated with fertility

[–] pageflight@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Generally seems like the right message, but there are plenty of third factors that might be a more direct cause — amount of drugs, microplastics, pesticides, etc in the environment / food.

[–] brianary@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 months ago
[–] MerryJaneDoe@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Personally, I prescribe to Carlin's philosophy. The problem will take care of itself.

https://youtu.be/UTPlKwkryEk?t=461

[–] Juice@midwest.social 4 points 2 months ago
[–] JizzmasterD@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago

There aren’t actually many cool hats

[–] asdasd201@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 2 months ago

Ecosocialism vs. Ecofascism

I believe if we get rid of some people, the world will become more sustainable.

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago

I don't feel like these positions are at odds with one another, unless you become active in reducing the number of humans, of course.

Like, you can uplift and protect people by stopping them from killing their environment, because you recognize that people are an invasive species that will do that.

[–] happybadger@hexbear.net -1 points 2 months ago

Urban ecology is the proof of dialectics.

[–] zenzanzoo@lemmy.world -2 points 2 months ago

I hate all extremists, left and right.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world -4 points 2 months ago

If everyone on the planet lived like an American... Yikes.