this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2026
159 points (100.0% liked)

News

36694 readers
1964 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Iran will completely shut the strategic Strait ​of Hormuz if Trump executes threats to target Iranian energy facilities, ​the country's Revolutionary Guards ​said in a statement on ⁠Sunday.

Trump on Saturday threatened ​to "obliterate" Iran's power plants ​if Tehran did not fully reopen the Strait of Hormuz within ​48-hours, suggesting a significant ​escalation barely a day after he ‌talked ⁠about "winding down" the war, now in its fourth week.

In their Sunday statement Iran's ​Revolutionary ​Guards ⁠also said companies with U.S. shares will ​be 'completely destroyed', if Iranian ​energy ⁠facilities were targeted by Washington and energy facilities ⁠in ​countries that host ​U.S. bases will be 'lawful' targets.

top 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] protist@retrofed.com 61 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Trump assumes the IRGC are as dumb as him and the people he's surrounded himself with, which is going to be catastrophic for how this goes for him. The IRGC are theocratic authoritarians who are not motivated by money, and he can't conceive of this, so is clearly at a total loss as to how to handle the situation he has created

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 11 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Just like the taliban, they aren't motivated by money, that is insightful. They believe in something. Which means none of what the US can do will work on them, just as it didn't with the taliban.

[–] couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip 7 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Worked on the Houthis though. Iran might be a tougher nut but they won't sacrifice everything just to keep the Strait closed

Then again, keeping power over the Strait is one of the most valuable pieces they still have on the board

[–] idriss@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

What worked with Houthis? they kinda paused because genocide was kinda paused, their demands were met and they made it clear they are ready to join again to fight Epstein coalition.

[–] couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip -1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Ah yes, the Houthis paused because their demands were met

pats head

[–] idriss@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 hours ago

Whatever makes you feel good :)

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 2 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

Raising oil prices is the ONLY card Iran has to play.

[–] sugarfoot00@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 hours ago

but as far as cards go, it is the ace of spades.

[–] pandapoo@sh.itjust.works 7 points 14 hours ago

Closing the straight is multifaceted, but yeah, hurting the global economy is pretty much their only strategy due to the asymmetric nature of this war.

[–] Sprocketfree@sh.itjust.works 0 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Idk, a bomb vest in Disneyland would be an interesting maneuver

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Mossad would do everything possible to help some mentally ill do that. Talk is they are hard at doing such.

[–] Sprocketfree@sh.itjust.works 1 points 13 hours ago

Just pointing out there's less technical options

[–] PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk 17 points 18 hours ago (4 children)

I'm in a very very privileged position to be able to say this, but I am more than happy to pay a little bit extra at the pump and on my gas bill, just for that colossal fuckwomble to be shown up on the world stage for being a weapons grade tosser.

Is it childish? Yes. Does it make me feel slightly better about the world? Also yes.

[–] Krono@lemmy.today 7 points 17 hours ago (4 children)

How long do you think that position will last?

If energy infrastructure is destroyed, then "paying a little bit extra at the pump" is just the beginning. You will need to reduce your overall consumption by 15-20%.

Remember the worst month of Covid? That's the last time consumption was reduced so heavily. Now imagine that Covid lifestyle for 5 years as energy infrastructure is rebuilt.

The joy of Trump's downfall will not be enough to mask the real economic pain, unfortunately.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 hours ago

I also recognize my privileged position when I say this: I'm pretty sure I can tolerate it longer than the American Oligarchs will tolerate the loss of profit and start using those politicians they've purchased to put an end to it.

[–] neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works 7 points 14 hours ago

I feel like this would be a net win for the world. Everyone in the old empire is shooting themselves in the dick right now. If Iran stops the flow of oil, countries are going to be forced to very, very, very quickly invest heavily in renewables more than they already are.

This idiot may have single handedly put a dent in global warming.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 6 points 16 hours ago

Now imagine that Covid lifestyle for 5 years

You say that as if I haven't already been doing that.

[–] PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk -1 points 17 hours ago

Yeah nah probably about a day or two.

[–] PlaidBaron@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Shit. Maybe the Alberta oil sands will finally be profitable! Haha, nah just kidding. They wont.

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 6 points 15 hours ago

I read they are profitable above 60 a barrel, like 15 years back.

[–] quackerjo@lemmy.wtf 2 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

They've been profitable for some time.

A lot of people say they're profitable at $60/barrel, but it's more like between $50 and $80, depending on a bunch different factors, such as location and extraction method.

But that's only considering profitability in the terms of the current political system.

If a new system came along that factored in harms to the environment, global warming, etc., they could go back to being unprofitable.

[–] a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world -3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Counterpoint to your counterpoint : Go rim a goat.

[–] Gork@sopuli.xyz 12 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

Did it open back up at some point?

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 18 points 19 hours ago

Yesterday(?) they announced it was open to anyone not working with the US/Israel

[–] protist@retrofed.com 15 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

They've been letting some ships through heading to India and China, and were talking about setting up a vetting system to allow more ships through

[–] lemmyout@lemmy.zip 3 points 17 hours ago (4 children)

I thought they were mining the strait? How are they gonna control who hits the mines?

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 7 points 14 hours ago

Anyone that mines keeps charts to keep their own ships clear.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 2 points 15 hours ago

They guide or pilot through the unmined passages.

[–] kurwa@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago

They put mines on the international part, not their own lanes.

[–] disablist 1 points 14 hours ago

They can't, which is why I'm skeptical that they actually laid any mines.

And it looks like at at least some level, the Trump administration assumed their only means of closing the straight was mines, which would have prevented them from using it as well.

Iran's new strategy of selective closure via missiles and drones clearly surprised the Trump administration.

[–] i078@europe.pub 0 points 18 hours ago

After the regime change, we’ll see in what country 

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

Another extremely reasonable statement by Iran

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

I don’t know enough about all this, but how difficult is it for them to keep it shut? Do they just bomb any boat that tries to go through it?

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 13 points 19 hours ago

Don't even need bombs, it's not very wide that can shoot at them with artillery very easily.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 4 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Merely threatening would be enough.

and insurance costs will do the blockade.

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 2 points 14 hours ago

No, they allow boats they clear through. Boats have obscured ownership, most are registered to the same three countries, little backwaters, so if they attack one specifically, it's because they got word their ownership is billinaire US or Israel or connected.

[–] atropa@piefed.social 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Great job , and now taco ?

[–] disablist 3 points 14 hours ago

I wish, but no, it's just deeper into the escalation trap for Trump.