this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2026
164 points (100.0% liked)

News

36694 readers
2049 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Iran will completely shut the strategic Strait ​of Hormuz if Trump executes threats to target Iranian energy facilities, ​the country's Revolutionary Guards ​said in a statement on ⁠Sunday.

Trump on Saturday threatened ​to "obliterate" Iran's power plants ​if Tehran did not fully reopen the Strait of Hormuz within ​48-hours, suggesting a significant ​escalation barely a day after he ‌talked ⁠about "winding down" the war, now in its fourth week.

In their Sunday statement Iran's ​Revolutionary ​Guards ⁠also said companies with U.S. shares will ​be 'completely destroyed', if Iranian ​energy ⁠facilities were targeted by Washington and energy facilities ⁠in ​countries that host ​U.S. bases will be 'lawful' targets.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk 17 points 21 hours ago (4 children)

I'm in a very very privileged position to be able to say this, but I am more than happy to pay a little bit extra at the pump and on my gas bill, just for that colossal fuckwomble to be shown up on the world stage for being a weapons grade tosser.

Is it childish? Yes. Does it make me feel slightly better about the world? Also yes.

[–] Krono@lemmy.today 6 points 20 hours ago (4 children)

How long do you think that position will last?

If energy infrastructure is destroyed, then "paying a little bit extra at the pump" is just the beginning. You will need to reduce your overall consumption by 15-20%.

Remember the worst month of Covid? That's the last time consumption was reduced so heavily. Now imagine that Covid lifestyle for 5 years as energy infrastructure is rebuilt.

The joy of Trump's downfall will not be enough to mask the real economic pain, unfortunately.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 hours ago

I also recognize my privileged position when I say this: I'm pretty sure I can tolerate it longer than the American Oligarchs will tolerate the loss of profit and start using those politicians they've purchased to put an end to it.

[–] neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works 7 points 17 hours ago

I feel like this would be a net win for the world. Everyone in the old empire is shooting themselves in the dick right now. If Iran stops the flow of oil, countries are going to be forced to very, very, very quickly invest heavily in renewables more than they already are.

This idiot may have single handedly put a dent in global warming.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 7 points 19 hours ago

Now imagine that Covid lifestyle for 5 years

You say that as if I haven't already been doing that.

[–] PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk -1 points 20 hours ago

Yeah nah probably about a day or two.

[–] PlaidBaron@lemmy.world 5 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Shit. Maybe the Alberta oil sands will finally be profitable! Haha, nah just kidding. They wont.

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 6 points 18 hours ago

I read they are profitable above 60 a barrel, like 15 years back.

[–] quackerjo@lemmy.wtf 3 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

They've been profitable for some time.

A lot of people say they're profitable at $60/barrel, but it's more like between $50 and $80, depending on a bunch different factors, such as location and extraction method.

But that's only considering profitability in the terms of the current political system.

If a new system came along that factored in harms to the environment, global warming, etc., they could go back to being unprofitable.

[–] a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world -3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Counterpoint to your counterpoint : Go rim a goat.