disablist

joined 2 years ago
[–] disablist 4 points 3 weeks ago

I wish, but no, it's just deeper into the escalation trap for Trump.

[–] disablist 1 points 3 weeks ago

They can't, which is why I'm skeptical that they actually laid any mines.

And it looks like at at least some level, the Trump administration assumed their only means of closing the straight was mines, which would have prevented them from using it as well.

Iran's new strategy of selective closure via missiles and drones clearly surprised the Trump administration.

[–] disablist 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Yes, being vocal and public your cancelation/leaving is really important to make clear why this is happening.

[–] disablist 2 points 6 months ago

At least you can still easily side load with Android, for the time being.

[–] disablist 2 points 6 months ago

Export all iCloud data, generate local backups for all of your iOS devices, cancel iCloud subscription, and most importantly, tell Apple why you canceled via their public social media channels.

[–] disablist 6 points 6 months ago

Great piece of FOSS.

[–] disablist 15 points 2 years ago (5 children)

They each put a quarter share of $1,000, per the article:

The four cofounders each own 25% of the company, and at launch each put in $1,000 to cover initial costs.

[–] disablist 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The UN wasn't designed to hold nuclear powers accountable to non-nuclear powers.

The UN only exists to prevent nuclear war and limit the scale and scope of wars that do breakout.

Anything else it does outside that scope, has to take those operational constraints into account.

That doesn't mean a nuclear power won't get the occasional tisk tisk, but that's mainly an attempt to vent the built up any anger and frustration.

The point is anyone hoping that any institution related to the UN will take radical or significant actions against a nuclear power, shouldn't hold their breath.

[–] disablist 21 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (10 children)

Good is relative. What you mean is that there isn't a perfect solution. Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good.

So if your argument is that a two state solution isn't perfect, therefore we shouldn't do it, then that's tacit approval for my first solution...a final solution if you will. Just pick a side, and poof.

If you're not comfortable with genocide, then a two state solution is the only viable path forward with any hope of chance of being made into a good outcome, even if not a perfect one.

So pick one: a final solution or a two-state solution, but stop with the wishy-washy "the status quo must remain until a perfect solution is found".

[–] disablist 31 points 2 years ago (13 children)

Great, then it's solved. The only solution is genocide. Doesn't matter which side, just pick one, and kill them all.

That is what you're saying, right?

[–] disablist 21 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Speaking on behalf of myself, and my entire race, I have complete faith in Facebook, Meta, and most importantly Mark Zuckerberg. He has never let us down, and I have no doubt our support and faith will be rewarded when we finally rise up and reclaim earth for all reptilian kind.

view more: next ›