this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2026
295 points (97.1% liked)

News

36354 readers
2500 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Most workers who aren’t saving for retirement through their employers aren’t saving at all, the study found

New data suggests the average American worker has under $1,000 saved for retirement.

A report from the National Institute on Retirement Security found that the median savings for all employed adults between the ages of 21 and 64 were approximately $955. The study includes workers with 401(k) and other retirement savings plans, as well as the approximately 56 million workers who do not have access to employer-sponsored retirement plans.

Workers with retirement savings plans have a median balance of approximately $40,000 saved, according to the report. That figure is nowhere near the $1.5 million that Americans say they need to feel comfortable fully retiring.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Stiffneckedppl@lemmy.world 63 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

I'm sure the situation is dire, but I'm not sure it communicates an accurate picture by lumping in 21 year olds with people who've been in the workforce for decades.

21 yr olds who are just entering the workforce or are in college aren't expected to have much, if any, retirement savings at that stage in their lives.

A better picture would be to break it down by age group. Still not a pretty picture, I'm sure.

[–] straycatstrut@discuss.tchncs.de 36 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

They've done that in the research, it's just a clickbait headline with very, very light details. After following a few clicks I found the PDF [1] in which they break it apart by many groups and factors (age, race, savings plan, income, student loan debt, all sorts of stuff) and that $955 figure falls under the "workers who do not have $1 in a DC" (meaning workers with no access to a savings plan). For those with access, the number is $40,000 average.

[1] https://www.nirsonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/NIRS_2026-Retirement-in-America-FINAL.pdf

[–] evenglow@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

For those with access, the number is $40,000 average.

Which is both in the article and OP summary.

[–] Steve@startrek.website 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

$40,000 still approaches zero. Its one or 2 years of expenses at best.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I didn't start having meaningful savings until my mid 20s. When i bought a house paying off the mortgage became a priority over saving for retirement. I'll be better off paying less interest and reducing my expenses faster than I would be collecting interest on that money. In theory i could out perform my mortgage interest rate by trading stocks, but that is a lot riskier than paying off the mortgage.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 61 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Without universal healthcare, even if you save millions, it can all be wiped out with a single illness.

[–] 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works 33 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

The rest of the world cannot comprehend such freedom

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Xerxos@lemmy.ml 28 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I would say that is intended. Every day I'm more convinced that the US is the Billionaire playground where they can test out how to press the most money out of the population.

With the big police state and enormous prison capacity ready to counter the eventual revolution.

Perhaps they are suprised themselves that no one revolts as they suck more and more money out of the population and reveal more and more of the degenerate lifestyle of the elites.

"They know that we f*ck and kill children and still don't revolt? What else do we need to do? We already take nearly all their money. Well, let's destroy the pension funds, perhaps that does the trick..."

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pyre@lemmy.world 21 points 3 weeks ago

well the solution is simple: deport brown people, ban trans people and give more money and tax cuts to corporations and billionaires. it'll all be over soon.

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 20 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

And you guys don't have a state pension either, right?

You guys really need to get on with a revolution. Work until you die is kinda supposed to be something we are moving away from

[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Life expectancy keeps lowering so no need to worry about retirement.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

There's social security, which does give seniors enough to exist, but not much else.

[–] FirstCircle@lemmy.ml 11 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Even SS is indexed by how much you earned as a wage-slave over your lifetime. If you've done something other than slaving for the Boss, or if your slaving has been for low pay, you get commensurately less in SS payments and the state will be happy to see you starve and freeze in old age.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 19 points 3 weeks ago

Garbage.

Tell me the average of all people who have more than zero (and the number that represents), then tell me how many have zero.

This number 955 doesn't mean shit.

[–] Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Fucking high rollers over there

My retirement plan is to die at work, that way my family is taken care of. (who am I kidding, my work will try to weasel out of paying them if that happens)

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Learn from the French: burn shit before you get to the point of starvation.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 7 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Your family will be lucky to get a pizza party.

[–] Darleys_Brew@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 weeks ago

“He worked so hard, we loved him. Were like family here. KThxBye.”

[–] robocall@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

The pizza dough contains potassium bromate which may be carcinogenic

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 16 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

Lots of people saying it's a skill issue that people aren't saving more of their earnings. The problem is much deeper: it doesn't make sense for the majority of Americans to save their money. This is the rational outcome of a political and economic system that does not offer hope, only cynicism.

[–] MousePotatoDoesStuff@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

If it was a handful of people, it could MAYBE be a skill issue. But when it's most people, it's a systemic issue.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I had several 401ks, I cashed them out fairly quickly because an emergency would come along and it was the only thing between me and homelessness, or not receiving medical care.

Now I have a 403(b) because I work for higher ed, and I am forbidden to cash it out, but I've taken a loan against it and paid off my credit cards, and am paying myself interest now.

So now I have my CCs freed up for the next time I have an emergency, which will be checks watch

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

If your employer offers a 401(k) match, not trying to take advantage of that is one of the absolute dumbest financial moves you can make. Yes, I understand people sometimes can’t that’s why I said “try”.

Another move is not investing early. The biggest boost to wealth in retirement is start saving early to take advantage of compounding interest.

[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

I'll upvote for the "try". Most people I know in tight spots need the money NOW. They are barely thinking 1 year ahead let alone 40.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (4 children)

This is a terrible stat. Taking the people who are entering the workforce and averaging them with people who have spent a lifetime working. Not only that, but that’s just “retirement” savings. How many 20 year olds have retirement accounts?

The information would be far more realistic if it were grouped by decade of life.

Edit: Here. This is a little better

Savings

Retirement savings

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Still very bleak. Nobody is retiring comfortably on $60k, much less $10k.

Might be worth factoring in SS, as that's the real practical retirement savings people rely upon.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

JFC this is depressing. Hopefully it forces some change though. I like that post about the French boyfriend asking why we don't burn shit. Hunger will make people burn shit.

[–] MeThisGuy@feddit.nl 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

6 meals away from anarchy or sumthin

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 9 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

How and why would you save as someone in the US? This country is collapsing.

[–] Stiffneckedppl@lemmy.world 19 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

You can invest in international markets if you think the US market is doomed. Still not a reason not to save. The bigger problem is that so many people simply can't afford living expenses AND saving for retirement.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Well you see, dr oz has an answer for that. Just start working earlier, and dont retire. No need to save

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 7 points 3 weeks ago

Life is a Crudite and we are merely sliced vegetables to be browsed over distractedly by the ultrawealthy.

[–] redlemace@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Even though i'm not an a american I thought it's a very negative thing to say and considered to argue. I found I have no augment to offer.

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

You money/investments/wealth isn't necessarily limited to just the US. Someone could take their assets and move to a different country and put those assets towards retirement.

The idea that you can't save because it's collapsing is just doubling down on sinking with the ship.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Perspectivist@feddit.uk 5 points 3 weeks ago

Invest everything you can into highly diversified, low-cost index funds and continue doing that for multiple decades. That's the how.

The why should be pretty obvious.

[–] eli@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Why wouldn't someone save in the US?

The country is burning down? Sure. We don't know what things will look like in a year? Me neither!

But I'd rather save and invest because in 40 years things may or may not have turned out fine. And I'd have a couple million and you will have zero because "why would you save!?!?" mentality.

If you get started early enough, you don't even have to save a lot over time or even month to month. But if you wait until the last second(40s, 50s?) you'll need to be dumping thousands per month just to catch up.

This is a math problem, not an emotional one.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Our lavish lifestyles include paying for food, shelter, healthcare, power and water and it keeps costing more and more but there’s record shareholder profits!!!! Yeah! You should be happy that the economy is great for pedofiles who rape children and possibly(checks notes) eat babies on yachts. Cool! they’re openly using all our tax dollars with the goal of making us working people obsolete while mass surveilling us and killing dissenters in the streets. Awesome

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] NABDad@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

I will be so happy eating cat food years from now knowing that I was more prepared than the average person.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

They have never wanted us to retire. They want us to work until we die.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] titanicx@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 weeks ago

I sure wish I had 955$ saved!

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 weeks ago

Soon there will be a critical mass of people who have nothing left to lose. Thats why the Democrats and Republicans need the military in the streets. Their wealthy benefactors cannot allow anything like the New Deal to happen again.

[–] HonorableScythe@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

There's gonna be a rash of people committing crimes in their 70s and 80s just to have a place to live and three meals a day.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›