this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2026
104 points (100.0% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14325 readers
654 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Crucible@hexbear.net 32 points 2 months ago (1 children)

When China says it is gonna do something like fulfill a treaty or a contract they actually fulfill it- but at what cost?

[–] ryepunk@hexbear.net 12 points 2 months ago

Not only do they fulfill it but they also exceed expectations with build quality. Compared to western shit which is often below the agreed upon minimum standards and you'll have to fight tooth and nail to get it there.

[–] vovchik_ilich@hexbear.net 28 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If by "the world" they mean "the west", as they usually do, then yes, the west will miss the times when it could be as hypocritical as it wanted because of global dominance

[–] Evilsandwichman@hexbear.net 23 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Actually they probably also mean the global South because they think they're doing the global South a favor and that this is a teaching moment; as a Kenyan official once reportedly said: "Every time China visits we get a hospital, every time Britain visits we get a lecture"

(CW: Twitter) https://x.com/geo_will/status/1787120422053691810

Alt link: https://xcancel.com/geo_will/status/1787120422053691810

[–] GrouchyGrouse@hexbear.net 15 points 2 months ago

The global south is going to really miss all those ways their infrastructure had even less of a chance to develop domestic alternatives before tech companies just decided to have complete control over their tech and communications if they start having Dangerous Ideas

[–] FlakesBongler@hexbear.net 24 points 2 months ago

So we've reached the state of society where they don't even bother with the quiet part

[–] THEPH0NECOMPANY@hexbear.net 24 points 2 months ago

Help I can't tell what's real and what's satire anymore stalin-stressed

[–] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 24 points 2 months ago

No actually it won't, shut up dipshit.

[–] LaBellaLotta@hexbear.net 19 points 2 months ago (1 children)

“Matias Spektor”

Oh come the fuck on even the author has a fucking supervillain secret identity name

[–] GrouchyGrouse@hexbear.net 15 points 2 months ago

Gonna look up his credentials and it’s just gonna list shit like “endangered animal hunter” “stolen art collector” “eye-patch but it only half conceals a bad-ass facial scar”

[–] SacredExcrement@hexbear.net 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They may have a point

I propose Western Society cease existing so we can test

[–] segfault11@hexbear.net 16 points 2 months ago

a spektor is haunting amerikkka some-controversy

[–] Ram_The_Manparts@hexbear.net 15 points 2 months ago

That is an amazing headline. 10/10, would read again.

[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 14 points 2 months ago
[–] anotherspinelessdem@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 months ago

CW: Abusive languageLook what you made me do to you

You're nothing without me

Where are you gonna go, huh?

[–] purpleworm@hexbear.net 12 points 2 months ago

I wonder what this person says about capitalism if they have such a problem with transparent transactional relationships.

[–] JoeByeThen@hexbear.net 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They've got a pageant for everything nowadays.

spray-bottle

[–] Maturin@hexbear.net 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] JoeByeThen@hexbear.net 7 points 2 months ago

I totally forgot about it! picard

volcel-kamala

[–] glimmer_twin@hexbear.net 6 points 2 months ago

“Transactional”? Lmao. More like might makes right robber baron shit.

[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 5 points 2 months ago

The West might. The rest of the world was already living in an overtly transactional world when engaging with the west previously, but those transactions were hideously unfair.

[–] SexUnderSocialism@hexbear.net 4 points 2 months ago