this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2026
101 points (100.0% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14245 readers
978 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For me, its a section from his speech entitled US Interventionism, the 3rd world, and the USSR, where he talks about what it means to read.

And I talked to a guy in Havana who says to me “Before all I used to see here in Havana, you call this drab and dull, we see it as a cleaner city. It’s true, the paint is peeling off the walls, but you don’t see kids begging in the streets anymore and you don’t see prostitutes, and always there was prostitutes.”Prostitution used to be one of the biggest industries. And today this man is going to night school. He said “I can read!" I can read! Do you know what it means to be able to read? Do you know what it means to be able not to read?

I remember when I gave my book to my father. I dedicated a book of mine to him, “Power and the Powerless” to my father, I said “To my father with my love,” I gave him a copy of the book, he opened it up and looked at it. He had only gone to the seventh grade, he was the son of an immigrant, a working-class Italian. And he opens the book and he starts looking through it, and he gets misty-eyed, very misty-eyed. And I thought it was because he was so touched that his son had dedicated a book to him. That wasn’t the reason. He looks up to me and he says ‘I can’t read this, kid” I said “That’s okay dad, neither can the students, that's not something... don’t worry about that. I wrote it for you, I mean it’s your book and you don’t have to read it. It’s a very complicated book, an academic book. He says, “I can’t read this book.” And the defeat. The defeat that man felt. That’s what illiteracy is about, that’s what the joy of literacy programs is. That’s why you got people in Nicaragua walking proud now for the first time. They were animals before, they weren’t allowed to read, they weren’t taught to read.

So, you compare a country to what it came from, with all its imperfections. And those who demand instant perfection the day after the revolution, they get up and say “Are there civil liberties for the fascists? Are they gonna be allowed their newspapers and their radio programs, are they gonna be able to keep all their farms? The passion that some of our liberals feel, the day after the revolution, the passion and concern they feel for the fascists, the civil rights and civil liberties of those fascists who are dumping and destroying and murdering people before. Now the revolution has gotta be perfect, it’s gotta be flawless.

Well that isn’t my criteria, my criteria is what happens to those people who couldn’t read? What happens to those babies that couldn’t eat, that died of hunger? And there? That’s why I support revolution. The revolution that feeds the children gets my support. Not blindly, not unqualified. And the Reaganite government that tries to stop that kind of process, that tries to keep those people in poverty and illiteracy and hunger, that gets my undiluted animosity and opposition.

all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AssortedBiscuits@hexbear.net 26 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Paraphrase off of memory:

"There have always been people against slavery. They were called slaves." - Parenti denouncing presentism

[–] RedWizard@hexbear.net 4 points 7 hours ago

He was just so good at exactly this kind of thing.

[–] TankieTanuki@hexbear.net 12 points 11 hours ago (1 children)
[–] RedWizard@hexbear.net 9 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

God he was so entertaining. What a great clip. My SO just finished the season of Blowback on Cuba where they cover Kennedy's assassination. It's such an eye opening exploration of the governments own findings. It completely shattered my conception of conspiracy theorists in the public sphere. Parenti had been saying this forever though.

Those who suffer from conspiracy phobia are fond of saying: “Do you actually think there’s a group of people sitting around in a room plotting things?” For some reason that image is assumed to be so patently absurd as to invite only disclaimers. But where else would people of power get together – on park benches or carousels? Indeed, they meet in rooms: corporate boardrooms, Pentagon command rooms, at the Bohemian Grove, in the choice dining rooms at the best restaurants, resorts, hotels, and estates, in the many conference rooms at the White House, the NSA, the CIA, or wherever. And, yes, they consciously plot – though they call it “planning” and “strategizing” – and they do so in great secrecy, often resisting all efforts at public disclosure. No one confabulates and plans more than political and corporate elites and their hired specialists. To make the world safe for those who own it, politically active elements of the owning class have created a national security state that expends billions of dollars and enlists the efforts of vast numbers of people.

Michael Parenti, Dirty Truths

[–] S4ck@hexbear.net 4 points 4 hours ago

He has a way of speaking so plainly, clearly, and with so much sense it's hard not to understand his point.

[–] purpleworm@hexbear.net 17 points 12 hours ago

Like many people, the "parenti quote" Parenti quote is my favorite, and honestly the reading one is probably my second favorite, but when I was trying to sell other people on Parenti I showed them this one:

The Third World is not poor. You don't go to poor countries to make money. There are very few poor countries in this world. Most countries are rich! The Philippines are rich! Brazil is rich! Mexico is rich! Chile is rich! Only the people are poor. But there's billions to be made there, to be carved out, and to be taken. There's been billions for 400 years! The capitalist European and North American powers have carved out and taken the timber, the flax, the hemp, the cocoa, the rum, the tin, the copper, the iron, the rubber, the bauxite, the slaves, and the cheap labour. They have taken out of these countries. These countries are not underdeveloped, they're overexploited!

He also has a few quotes about the idea of "conspiracy theories" that I like, but I think the stronger version is less commonly transcribed.

[–] thefunkycomitatus@hexbear.net 33 points 15 hours ago

I tell students when they say, 'Oh they don't care what we think. They ignore us', and all that, and I say, 'Oh no, no. That's the only thing they care about you. The only thing they care about you is what you're thinking. They don't care if you eat correctly, they don't care how your living conditions are, they don't care that they've built up an inhuman and irrational traffic system that's strangulating us and polluting our air, they don't care about anything. What they... the only thing about you they care about is what you're thinking. In the morning, they start, 'What's going to be the story today? How do we manipulate, how do we control, how do we contain, how do we influence, how do we act upon what it is that they have in their minds? '

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 36 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

There's a bunch from that lecture and Blackshirts and Reds that will be relevant for as long as capitalism lasts. But I liked what I was reading in The Assassination of Julius Caesar, there's a lot of light bulb moments reading that book and seeing how the ruling classes have always been similar in how they operate.

Here's one from the final chapter that is pretty topical, emphasis mine:

By ancient custom, when a master was murdered by a slave all servi in the household had to be put to death. In this instance it meant the extermination of some 400 souls, including women and children. The possibility of such a mass execution caused a public outcry compelling the Senate to hold a formal debate on the issue. One of the senior members of the Senate spoke at length in support of the executions, maintaining that the slaveholder’s interest demanded that there be no departure from ancient practice no matter how harsh the outcome. If all 400 slaves are not executed, who among us will be safe? he argued. There were a few uneasy outcries, but no senator took the floor to denounce the measure, which was passed without further debate.^[Tacitus, Annuls, XIV.42-45]

This mass execution however did evoke angry protests from the plebs, who assembled outside the Senate House armed with stones and torches. Nero had to bring out the troops to line the route over which the condemned passed. Of course, Tacitus refers to the protesters as “the mob” but he makes no critical reference to the lynch-mob mentality that prevailed within the Senate House among those who sanctioned this mass murder. The deep sense of moral outrage expressed by the protestors signaled a sympathetic bond between impoverished slaves and impoverished plebs.

Someone mentioned that if the Minneapolis unrest keeps going and turns into a situation comparable to the Troubles, the occupation will be left out of the history books. The ruling class can have their death squads, occupy cities, blatantly murder people, but as far as the mainstream historiography will go the story starts the second people begin resisting.

[–] RedWizard@hexbear.net 24 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I haven't read this book yet but I should read it next. This is the last paragraph and it's a real banger:

“And the people of Rome themselves, the anonymous masses upon whose shoulders the populares stood, come down to us hardly at all, or most usually as a disreputable mob. They who struggled against all odds with all the fear and courage of ordinary humans, whose names we shall never know, whose blood and tears we shall never see, whose cries of pain and hope we shall never hear, to them we are linked by a past that is never dead nor ever really past. And so, when the best pages of history are finally written, it will be not by princes, presidents, prime ministers, or pundits, nor even by professors, but by the people themselves. For all their faults and shortcomings, the people are all we have. Indeed, we are they.”

— Last paragraph from ‘The Assassination of Julius Caesar: A People's History of Ancient Rome’

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 8 points 15 hours ago

Yeah I was gonna post that one but I found the bit about the mass executions and thought "huh, that's interesting" so went with that instead.

[–] Omegamint@hexbear.net 9 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I’m surprised I haven’t read it yet, I’m definitely one of those dorks that enjoys Roman history and this is like a double whammy of Parenti and Rome slop

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 10 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

It's got some very spicy Cicero slander.

[–] Omegamint@hexbear.net 9 points 14 hours ago

The man was an obvious snob, and I can make a lot of assumptions based on only that, lol

[–] LeninWalksTheEarth@hexbear.net 12 points 13 hours ago

it's 2am and im watching yellow Parenti

[–] ReadFanon@hexbear.net 20 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

There's this quote from Parenti that always resonated with me perhaps more than any other and it gets truer with every passing day:

https://files.catbox.moe/7h5asj.mp4

[–] decaptcha@hexbear.net 8 points 9 hours ago

I hadn't heard this one before, thanks. Man couldn't miss.

[–] RedWizard@hexbear.net 3 points 7 hours ago

Oh wow this is good. I should frame this.

[–] leftofthat@hexbear.net 20 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

"If you feel discouraged about it. If you feel...defeated and all those things; feel bad. It's okay. Feel discouraged; feel disgusted; feel defeated. Feel that for awhile, and then get back up and start fighting again. It's not because it's a good idea. It's not because it would make a better world. It's because we have to. It's out of necessity. It's for our survival. It's for the survival of real democracy, which they are nibbling away at and cutting back at with all sorts of repressive laws. And it's for the very survival of the Earth itself.

I have a friend who...had a neck problem. He went to an acupuncturist. And the Chinese acupuncturist put a needle in his wrist. Put one in his leg. And he said: 'Wait a minute - I don't get the connection. I got a neck--neck is hurting me and you're putting a needle in my arm and in my leg. What's the connection?' And the Chinese acupuncturist said: 'Whole body connected, take a look.' You know, that typical Chinese gentle contempt for the Western idiocy.

And so what we gotta say: 'Whole society connected; take a look.' 'Whole universe connected; take a look.' It's our universe, and we have got to fight to keep it."

-----As seen on: Michael Parenti Cheers You Libs Up

[–] RedWizard@hexbear.net 7 points 15 hours ago

Oh yeah this ones a classic too.

[–] XxFemboy_Stalin_420_69xX@hexbear.net 16 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

don't remember the full thing but the one about "unfalsifiable orthodoxy" is a mega banger

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 20 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

“During the cold war, the anticommunist ideological framework could transform any data about existing communist societies into hostile evidence. If the Soviets refused to negotiate a point, they were intransigent and belligerent; if they appeared willing to make concessions, this was but a skillful ploy to put us off our guard. By opposing arms limitations, they would have demonstrated their aggressive intent; but when in fact they supported most armament treaties, it was because they were mendacious and manipulative. If the churches in the USSR were empty, this demonstrated that religion was suppressed; but if the churches were full, this meant the people were rejecting the regime's atheistic ideology. If the workers went on strike (as happened on infrequent occasions), this was evidence of their alienation from the collectivist system; if they didn't go on strike, this was because they were intimidated and lacked freedom. A scarcity of consumer goods demonstrated the failure of the economic system; an improvement in consumer supplies meant only that the leaders were attempting to placate a restive population and so maintain a firmer hold over them.

If communists in the United States played an important role struggling for the rights of workers, the poor, African-Americans, women, and others, this was only their guileful way of gathering support among disfranchised groups and gaining power for themselves. How one gained power by fighting for the rights of powerless groups was never explained. What we are dealing with is a nonfalsifiable orthodoxy, so assiduously marketed by the ruling interests that it affected people across the entire political spectrum.”

From Blackshirts and Reds.

[–] HarryLime@hexbear.net 10 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)
[–] RedWizard@hexbear.net 6 points 7 hours ago

Every time he talks about his Dad not being able to read I cry.