this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2026
104 points (100.0% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14245 readers
1019 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For me, its a section from his speech entitled US Interventionism, the 3rd world, and the USSR, where he talks about what it means to read.

And I talked to a guy in Havana who says to me “Before all I used to see here in Havana, you call this drab and dull, we see it as a cleaner city. It’s true, the paint is peeling off the walls, but you don’t see kids begging in the streets anymore and you don’t see prostitutes, and always there was prostitutes.”Prostitution used to be one of the biggest industries. And today this man is going to night school. He said “I can read!" I can read! Do you know what it means to be able to read? Do you know what it means to be able not to read?

I remember when I gave my book to my father. I dedicated a book of mine to him, “Power and the Powerless” to my father, I said “To my father with my love,” I gave him a copy of the book, he opened it up and looked at it. He had only gone to the seventh grade, he was the son of an immigrant, a working-class Italian. And he opens the book and he starts looking through it, and he gets misty-eyed, very misty-eyed. And I thought it was because he was so touched that his son had dedicated a book to him. That wasn’t the reason. He looks up to me and he says ‘I can’t read this, kid” I said “That’s okay dad, neither can the students, that's not something... don’t worry about that. I wrote it for you, I mean it’s your book and you don’t have to read it. It’s a very complicated book, an academic book. He says, “I can’t read this book.” And the defeat. The defeat that man felt. That’s what illiteracy is about, that’s what the joy of literacy programs is. That’s why you got people in Nicaragua walking proud now for the first time. They were animals before, they weren’t allowed to read, they weren’t taught to read.

So, you compare a country to what it came from, with all its imperfections. And those who demand instant perfection the day after the revolution, they get up and say “Are there civil liberties for the fascists? Are they gonna be allowed their newspapers and their radio programs, are they gonna be able to keep all their farms? The passion that some of our liberals feel, the day after the revolution, the passion and concern they feel for the fascists, the civil rights and civil liberties of those fascists who are dumping and destroying and murdering people before. Now the revolution has gotta be perfect, it’s gotta be flawless.

Well that isn’t my criteria, my criteria is what happens to those people who couldn’t read? What happens to those babies that couldn’t eat, that died of hunger? And there? That’s why I support revolution. The revolution that feeds the children gets my support. Not blindly, not unqualified. And the Reaganite government that tries to stop that kind of process, that tries to keep those people in poverty and illiteracy and hunger, that gets my undiluted animosity and opposition.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 39 points 1 day ago (2 children)

There's a bunch from that lecture and Blackshirts and Reds that will be relevant for as long as capitalism lasts. But I liked what I was reading in The Assassination of Julius Caesar, there's a lot of light bulb moments reading that book and seeing how the ruling classes have always been similar in how they operate.

Here's one from the final chapter that is pretty topical, emphasis mine:

By ancient custom, when a master was murdered by a slave all servi in the household had to be put to death. In this instance it meant the extermination of some 400 souls, including women and children. The possibility of such a mass execution caused a public outcry compelling the Senate to hold a formal debate on the issue. One of the senior members of the Senate spoke at length in support of the executions, maintaining that the slaveholder’s interest demanded that there be no departure from ancient practice no matter how harsh the outcome. If all 400 slaves are not executed, who among us will be safe? he argued. There were a few uneasy outcries, but no senator took the floor to denounce the measure, which was passed without further debate.^[Tacitus, Annuls, XIV.42-45]

This mass execution however did evoke angry protests from the plebs, who assembled outside the Senate House armed with stones and torches. Nero had to bring out the troops to line the route over which the condemned passed. Of course, Tacitus refers to the protesters as “the mob” but he makes no critical reference to the lynch-mob mentality that prevailed within the Senate House among those who sanctioned this mass murder. The deep sense of moral outrage expressed by the protestors signaled a sympathetic bond between impoverished slaves and impoverished plebs.

Someone mentioned that if the Minneapolis unrest keeps going and turns into a situation comparable to the Troubles, the occupation will be left out of the history books. The ruling class can have their death squads, occupy cities, blatantly murder people, but as far as the mainstream historiography will go the story starts the second people begin resisting.

[–] RedWizard@hexbear.net 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I haven't read this book yet but I should read it next. This is the last paragraph and it's a real banger:

“And the people of Rome themselves, the anonymous masses upon whose shoulders the populares stood, come down to us hardly at all, or most usually as a disreputable mob. They who struggled against all odds with all the fear and courage of ordinary humans, whose names we shall never know, whose blood and tears we shall never see, whose cries of pain and hope we shall never hear, to them we are linked by a past that is never dead nor ever really past. And so, when the best pages of history are finally written, it will be not by princes, presidents, prime ministers, or pundits, nor even by professors, but by the people themselves. For all their faults and shortcomings, the people are all we have. Indeed, we are they.”

— Last paragraph from ‘The Assassination of Julius Caesar: A People's History of Ancient Rome’

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 8 points 1 day ago

Yeah I was gonna post that one but I found the bit about the mass executions and thought "huh, that's interesting" so went with that instead.

[–] Omegamint@hexbear.net 11 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I’m surprised I haven’t read it yet, I’m definitely one of those dorks that enjoys Roman history and this is like a double whammy of Parenti and Rome slop

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 12 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

It's got some very spicy Cicero slander.

[–] Omegamint@hexbear.net 9 points 23 hours ago

The man was an obvious snob, and I can make a lot of assumptions based on only that, lol